Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Rising Drug Costs Drives the Growth of Pharmacy Benefit Managers Exclusion Lists: Are Exclusion Decisions Value-Based?


ABSTRACT:

Objective

We examine whether drugs' excluded versus recommended status on pharmacy benefit manager exclusion lists corresponds to evidence from cost-effectiveness analyses, lack of evidence, or rebates.

Data sources

To find cost-effectiveness data for drugs on 2016 exclusion lists of CVS Caremark and Express Scripts, we searched the Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry and the peer-reviewed literature.

Study design

For each excluded and recommended drug, we compared the mean cost-per-QALY, and we calculated the difference between the numbers of excluded and recommended drugs for which we could find no cost-effectiveness evidence.

Data collection

As keywords in our searches, we used the brand and generic drug name and "cost-effectiveness" and "cost-per-quality-adjusted life-year." Of 240 retrieved studies, 110 were selected for analysis.

Principal findings

The mean cost-per-QALY for excluded drugs was higher ($51,611) than the cost-per-QALY for recommended drugs ($49,474), but not statistically significant. We could find no cost-effectiveness evidence in the Registry or peer-reviewed literature for 23 of the excluded drugs, and no evidence for 5 of the recommended drugs.

Conclusions

Cost-effectiveness does not correlate with a drug's excluded or recommended status. Lack of cost-effectiveness evidence favors a drug's excluded status.

SUBMITTER: Cohen JP 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6056588 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Rising Drug Costs Drives the Growth of Pharmacy Benefit Managers Exclusion Lists: Are Exclusion Decisions Value-Based?

Cohen Joshua P JP   Khoury Christelle El CE   Milne Christopher-Paul CP   Peters Sandra M SM  

Health services research 20171018


<h4>Objective</h4>We examine whether drugs' excluded versus recommended status on pharmacy benefit manager exclusion lists corresponds to evidence from cost-effectiveness analyses, lack of evidence, or rebates.<h4>Data sources</h4>To find cost-effectiveness data for drugs on 2016 exclusion lists of CVS Caremark and Express Scripts, we searched the Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry and the peer-reviewed literature.<h4>Study design</h4>For each excluded and recommended drug, we compared t  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3634673 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4924941 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7251257 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3714598 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6631892 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5953570 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5817604 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5894991 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6179233 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2765263 | biostudies-literature