Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Introduction of pathogenic mutations into the mouse Psen1 gene by Base Editor and Target-AID.


ABSTRACT: Base Editor (BE) and Target-AID (activation-induced cytidine deaminase) are engineered genome-editing proteins composed of Cas9 and cytidine deaminases. These base-editing tools convert C:G base pairs to T:A at target sites. Here, we inject either BE or Target-AID mRNA together with identical single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) into mouse zygotes, and compare the base-editing efficiencies of the two distinct tools in vivo. BE consistently show higher base-editing efficiency (10.0-62.8%) compared to that of Target-AID (3.4-29.8%). However, unexpected base substitutions and insertion/deletion formations are also more frequently observed in BE-injected mice or zygotes. We are able to generate multiple mouse lines harboring point mutations in the mouse presenilin 1 (Psen1) gene by injection of BE or Target-AID. These results demonstrate that BE and Target-AID are highly useful tools to generate mice harboring pathogenic point mutations and to analyze the functional consequences of the mutations in vivo.

SUBMITTER: Sasaguri H 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6057936 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Introduction of pathogenic mutations into the mouse Psen1 gene by Base Editor and Target-AID.

Sasaguri Hiroki H   Nagata Kenichi K   Sekiguchi Misaki M   Fujioka Ryo R   Matsuba Yukio Y   Hashimoto Shoko S   Sato Kaori K   Kurup Deepika D   Yokota Takanori T   Saido Takaomi C TC  

Nature communications 20180724 1


Base Editor (BE) and Target-AID (activation-induced cytidine deaminase) are engineered genome-editing proteins composed of Cas9 and cytidine deaminases. These base-editing tools convert C:G base pairs to T:A at target sites. Here, we inject either BE or Target-AID mRNA together with identical single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) into mouse zygotes, and compare the base-editing efficiencies of the two distinct tools in vivo. BE consistently show higher base-editing efficiency (10.0-62.8%) compared to that  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6952419 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7301308 | biostudies-literature
2021-03-12 | GSE164477 | GEO
| S-EPMC5546933 | biostudies-literature
2021-03-12 | GSE164837 | GEO
| S-EPMC7686336 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6181770 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8697861 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5352369 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA690814 | ENA