Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Literature has focused on effect sizes rather than individual-level improvement rates to determine how effectively services address burgeoning numbers of adolescents with anxiety and depression.AimsTo consider how many adolescents report reliable improvement in anxiety, depression and comorbid depression and anxiety by end of treatment.Method
The primary outcome was reliable improvement (i.e. change greater than likely the result of measurement error) in self-reported anxiety and depression for N = 4464 adolescents (mean age 14.5 years, s.d. = 1.9; 75% female; 61% White) seen in specialist mental health services in England.Results
In total, 53% of those with anxiety, 44% with depression, and 35% with comorbid depression and anxiety showed reliable improvement.Conclusions
Improvement rates were higher than previously reported, but lower than generally used in advice to the public. There may be a need to set more realistic expectations, including with young people who seek help.Declaration of interestAll authors were involved in the programme of service transformation that this report draws on. M.W. led the outcomes and evaluation group that agreed the approach to measurement used in the initiative.
SUBMITTER: Edbrooke-Childs J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6060492 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Edbrooke-Childs Julian J Wolpert Miranda M Zamperoni Victoria V Napoleone Elisa E Bear Holly H
BJPsych open 20180701 4
<h4>Background</h4>Literature has focused on effect sizes rather than individual-level improvement rates to determine how effectively services address burgeoning numbers of adolescents with anxiety and depression.AimsTo consider how many adolescents report reliable improvement in anxiety, depression and comorbid depression and anxiety by end of treatment.<h4>Method</h4>The primary outcome was reliable improvement (i.e. change greater than likely the result of measurement error) in self-reported ...[more]