Dataset Information

Incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals affected by recent changes to US blood pressure treatment guidelines.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:We evaluated the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals whose blood pressure (BP) management strategy would change with adoption of recent US hypertension guidelines in two large, community-based cohorts with different racial and geographic compositions: the Framingham and Jackson Heart Studies (FHS and JHS). METHODS:We assigned 11?237 FHS (mean age 46, 53% women) and 2948 JHS (mean age 55, 69% women) participants free of CVD and chronic kidney disease to one of five categories representing different treatment recommendations between 2014 Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report from the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee and The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guidelines. Absolute incidence rates (incidence rate; per 1000 person-years) and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were calculated for each group; cohort-specific results were combined using fixed effect meta-analysis. RESULTS:CVD events occurred in 1047 FHS and 230 JHS participants during mean follow-up times of 11 and 8.9 years, respectively. Compared with individuals without hypertension, those with BP 140-149/<90?mmHg had increased risk for CVD regardless of treatment status [hazard ratio for untreated BP 140-149/<90?mmHg 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-2.75; hazard ratio for treated BP 140-149/<90?mmHg 3.37, 95% CI 2.37-4.78]. The risk for those with treated BP 140-149/<90?mmHg was consistent in those aged at least 60 years (hazard ratio: 2.61, 95% CI 1.75-3.90). Statistical power was limited to evaluate the effect of diabetes. CONCLUSION:Individuals with treated BP 140-149/<90?mmHg have increased risk of CVD compared with those without hypertension including in participants at least 60 years. The 2014 Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report from the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee recommendations to treat BP levels less aggressively may be associated with substantial residual CVD risk.

SUBMITTER: Nayor M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6062206 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals affected by recent changes to US blood pressure treatment guidelines.

Nayor Matthew M Duncan Meredith S MS Musani Solomon K SK Xanthakis Vanessa V LaValley Michael P MP Larson Martin G MG Fox Ervin R ER Vasan Ramachandran S RS

Journal of hypertension 20180201 2

<h4>Objective</h4>We evaluated the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals whose blood pressure (BP) management strategy would change with adoption of recent US hypertension guidelines in two large, community-based cohorts with different racial and geographic compositions: the Framingham and Jackson Heart Studies (FHS and JHS).<h4>Methods</h4>We assigned 11 237 FHS (mean age 46, 53% women) and 2948 JHS (mean age 55, 69% women) participants free of CVD and chronic kidney disease ...[more]

PMID: 29084083

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) blood pressure (BP) guideline provides updated recommendations for antihypertensive medication initiation and intensification. OBJECTIVES:Determine the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among adults recommended and not recommended antihypertensive medication initiation or intensification by the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline. METHODS:The authors analyzed data for black and white REGARDS (REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke) study participants (age ?45 years). Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were measured twice at baseline (2003 to 2007) and averaged. Participants not taking (n = 14,039) and taking (n = 15,179) antihypertensive medication were categorized according to their recommendations for antihypertensive medication initiation and intensification by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline. Overall, 4,094 CVD events (stroke, coronary heart disease, and heart failure) occurred by December 31, 2014. RESULTS:Among participants not taking antihypertensive medication, 34.4% were recommended pharmacological antihypertensive treatment initiation. The CVD event rate per 1,000 person-years among participants recommended antihypertensive medication initiation with SBP/DBP ?140/90 mm Hg was 22.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3 to 25.0). Among participants with SBP/DBP 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg, the CVD event rate was 20.5 (95% CI: 18.5 to 22.6) and 3.4 (95% CI: 2.4 to 4.4) for those recommended and not recommended antihypertensive medication initiation, respectively. Among participants taking antihypertensive medication, 62.8% were recommended treatment intensification. The CVD event rate per 1,000 person-years among participants recommended treatment intensification was 33.6 (95% CI: 31.5 to 35.6) and 22.4 (95% CI: 20.8 to 23.9) for those with SBP/DBP ?140/90 mm Hg and 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Implementing the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline would direct antihypertensive medication initiation and intensification to adults with high CVD risk.

Project description:BackgroundClinical practice guidelines have traditionally recommended blood pressure treatment based primarily on blood pressure thresholds. In contrast, using predicted cardiovascular risk has been advocated as a more effective strategy to guide treatment decisions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. We aimed to compare outcomes from a blood pressure-lowering treatment strategy based on predicted cardiovascular risk with one based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) level.Methods and findingsWe used individual participant data from the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (BPLTTC) from 1995 to 2013. Trials randomly assigned participants to either blood pressure-lowering drugs versus placebo or more intensive versus less intensive blood pressure-lowering regimens. We estimated 5-y risk of CVD events using a multivariable Weibull model previously developed in this dataset. We compared the two strategies at specific SBP thresholds and across the spectrum of risk and blood pressure levels studied in BPLTTC trials. The primary outcome was number of CVD events avoided per persons treated. We included data from 11 trials (47,872 participants). During a median of 4.0 y of follow-up, 3,566 participants (7.5%) experienced a major cardiovascular event. Areas under the curve comparing the two treatment strategies throughout the range of possible thresholds for CVD risk and SBP demonstrated that, on average, a greater number of CVD events would be avoided for a given number of persons treated with the CVD risk strategy compared with the SBP strategy (area under the curve 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.72] for the CVD risk strategy versus 0.54 [95% CI 0.53-0.55] for the SBP strategy). Compared with treating everyone with SBP ≥ 150 mmHg, a CVD risk strategy would require treatment of 29% (95% CI 26%-31%) fewer persons to prevent the same number of events or would prevent 16% (95% CI 14%-18%) more events for the same number of persons treated. Compared with treating everyone with SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, a CVD risk strategy would require treatment of 3.8% (95% CI 12.5% fewer to 7.2% more) fewer persons to prevent the same number of events or would prevent 3.1% (95% CI 1.5%-5.0%) more events for the same number of persons treated, although the former estimate was not statistically significant. In subgroup analyses, the CVD risk strategy did not appear to be more beneficial than the SBP strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus or established CVD.ConclusionsA blood pressure-lowering treatment strategy based on predicted cardiovascular risk is more effective than one based on blood pressure levels alone across a range of thresholds. These results support using cardiovascular risk assessment to guide blood pressure treatment decision-making in moderate- to high-risk individuals, particularly for primary prevention.

Dataset Information

Incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals affected by recent changes to US blood pressure treatment guidelines.

Publications

Incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals affected by recent changes to US blood pressure treatment guidelines.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets