Dataset Information

Personalized disease signatures through information-theoretic compaction of big cancer data.

ABSTRACT: Every individual cancer develops and grows in its own specific way, giving rise to a recognized need for the development of personalized cancer diagnostics. This suggested that the identification of patient-specific oncogene markers would be an effective diagnostics approach. However, tumors that are classified as similar according to the expression levels of certain oncogenes can eventually demonstrate divergent responses to treatment. This implies that the information gained from the identification of tumor-specific biomarkers is still not sufficient. We present a method to quantitatively transform heterogeneous big cancer data to patient-specific transcription networks. These networks characterize the unbalanced molecular processes that deviate the tissue from the normal state. We study a number of datasets spanning five different cancer types, aiming to capture the extensive interpatient heterogeneity that exists within a specific cancer type as well as between cancers of different origins. We show that a relatively small number of altered molecular processes suffices to accurately characterize over 500 tumors, showing extreme compaction of the data. Every patient is characterized by a small specific subset of unbalanced processes. We validate the result by verifying that the processes identified characterize other cancer patients as well. We show that different patients may display similar oncogene expression levels, albeit carrying biologically distinct tumors that harbor different sets of unbalanced molecular processes. Thus, tumors may be inaccurately classified and addressed as similar. These findings highlight the need to expand the notion of tumor-specific oncogenic biomarkers to patient-specific, comprehensive transcriptional networks for improved patient-tailored diagnostics.

SUBMITTER: Vasudevan S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6065026 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Personalized disease signatures through information-theoretic compaction of big cancer data.

Vasudevan Swetha S Flashner-Abramson Efrat E Remacle F F Levine R D RD Kravchenko-Balasha Nataly N

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20180705 30

Every individual cancer develops and grows in its own specific way, giving rise to a recognized need for the development of personalized cancer diagnostics. This suggested that the identification of patient-specific oncogene markers would be an effective diagnostics approach. However, tumors that are classified as similar according to the expression levels of certain oncogenes can eventually demonstrate divergent responses to treatment. This implies that the information gained from the identific ...[more]

PMID: 29976841

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesSynthetic datasets are artificially manufactured based on real health systems data but do not contain real patient information. We sought to validate the use of synthetic data in stroke and cancer research by conducting a comparison study of cancer patients with ischemic stroke to non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke.Designretrospective cohort study.SettingWe used synthetic data generated by MDClone and compared it to its original source data (i.e. real patient data from the Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse).Outcome measuresWe compared key differences in demographics, treatment characteristics, length of stay, and costs between cancer patients with ischemic stroke and non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke. We used a binary, multivariable logistic regression model to identify risk factors for recurrent stroke in the cancer population.ResultsUsing synthetic data, we found cancer patients with ischemic stroke had a lower prevalence of hypertension (52.0% in the cancer cohort vs 57.7% in the non-cancer cohort, p<0.0001), and a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: 8.5% vs 4.7%, p<0.0001), prior ischemic stroke (1.7% vs 0.1%, p<0.001), and prior venous thromboembolism (VTE: 8.2% vs 1.5%, p<0.0001). They also had a longer length of stay (8 days [IQR 3-16] vs 6 days [IQR 3-13], p = 0.011), and higher costs associated with their stroke encounters: $11,498 (IQR $4,440 -$20,668) in the cancer cohort vs $8,084 (IQR $3,947 -$16,706) in the non-cancer cohort (p = 0.0061). A multivariable logistic regression model identified 5 predictors for recurrent ischemic stroke in the cancer cohort using synthetic data; 3 of the same predictors identified using real patient data with similar effect measures. Summary statistics between synthetic and original datasets did not significantly differ, other than slight differences in the distributions of frequencies for numeric data.ConclusionWe demonstrated the utility of synthetic data in stroke and cancer research and provided key differences between cancer and non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke. Synthetic data is a powerful tool that can allow researchers to easily explore hypothesis generation, enable data sharing without privacy breaches, and ensure broad access to big data in a rapid, safe, and reliable fashion.

Dataset Information

Personalized disease signatures through information-theoretic compaction of big cancer data.

Publications

Personalized disease signatures through information-theoretic compaction of big cancer data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets