Dataset Information

Trends in the treatment of urinary stone disease in Turkey.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

In this study, a survey was prepared for urologists that asked about their primary choice of treatment for urolithiasis in daily practice and their answers were evaluated.

Methods

The survey was prepared on the Google Docs website and it was sent to 1,016 urologists via email with 752 confirmed deliveries. In addition to the demographic questions about each participant's age, gender, and institution, the survey presented case scenarios focusing on their preferred treatment modalities for distal ureteric, proximal ureteric, and renal calculi. The participating urologists were divided into two groups according to the frequency that they treat urolithiasis patients.

Results

Of the 752 surveys delivered, 211 urologists (28.05%) responded and 204 answered all questions. According to the results, there were no significant differences between the treatment approaches and the other localizations, but there was a statistically significant difference for treatment approaches to lower pole stones between two groups. In response to the question of which stone treatment method was used less frequently, 124 (60.7%) participants answered that they used shock wave lithotripsy less in the last 10 years.

Conclusion

The present study has shown that while the management of renal and ureteric calculi by Turkish urologists is highly varied, the overall treatment patterns are in accordance with the European Association of Urology guidelines. However, similar to the global trend extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is less preferred by Turkish urologists.

SUBMITTER: Yildirim K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6074772 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Trends in the treatment of urinary stone disease in Turkey.

Yildirim Kadir K Olcucu Mahmut Taha MT Colak Muhammed Emre ME

PeerJ 20180731

<h4>Introduction</h4>In this study, a survey was prepared for urologists that asked about their primary choice of treatment for urolithiasis in daily practice and their answers were evaluated.<h4>Methods</h4>The survey was prepared on the Google Docs website and it was sent to 1,016 urologists via email with 752 confirmed deliveries. In addition to the demographic questions about each participant's age, gender, and institution, the survey presented case scenarios focusing on their preferred trea ...[more]

PMID: 30083475

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction: In complex microbial communities, the importance of microbial species at very low abundance levels and their prevalence for overall community structure and function is increasingly being recognized. Clinical microbiome studies on urinary stone disease (USD) have indicated that both the gut and urinary tract microbiota are associated with the onset of the disease and that kidney stones them-selves harbor a complex, yet consistent and viable, microbiome. However, how rare phylotypes contribute to this association remains unclear. Delineating the contribution of rare and common phylotypes to urinary stone disease is important for the development of bacteriotherapies to promote urologic health. Methods: The objectives of the current report were to conduct a metaanalysis of 16S rRNA datasets derived from the kidney stone, stool, and urine samples of participants with or without urinary stone disease. To delineate the impact of rare and common phylotypes, metaanalyses were conducted by first separating rare and common taxa determined by both the frequency and abundance of amplicon sequence variants. Results: Consistent with previous analyses, we found that gut, upper urinary, and lower urinary tract microbiomes were all unique. Rare phylotypes comprised the majority of species observed in all sample types, with kidney stones exhibiting the greatest bias toward rarity, followed by urine and stool. Both rare and common fractions contributed significantly to the differences observed between sample types and health disparity. Furthermore, the rare and common fractions were taxonomically unique across all sample types. A total of 222 and 320 unique rare phylotypes from urine and stool samples were found to be significantly associated with USD. A co-occurrence correlation analysis revealed that rare phylotypes are most important for microbiome structure in stones, followed by urine and stool. Discussion: Collectively, the results indicate that rare phylotypes may be important for the pathophysiology of USD, particularly in the kidney stone matrix, which is inherently a very low microbial biomass niche that can have implications for the diagnosis and treatment of kidney stones. Further studies are needed to investigate the functional significance of rare phylotypes in kidney stone pathogenesis.

Dataset Information

Trends in the treatment of urinary stone disease in Turkey.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Trends in the treatment of urinary stone disease in Turkey.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets