Dataset Information

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Evolution or Revolution?

ABSTRACT: An estimated 20% of patients with cancer will develop brain metastases. Approximately 200,000 individuals in the United States alone receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) each year to treat brain metastases. Historically, the prognosis of patients with brain metastases has been poor; however, with new therapies, this is changing. Because patients are living longer following the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases, there has been rising concern about treatment-related toxicities associated with WBRT, including neurocognitive toxicity. In addition, recent clinical trials have raised questions about the use of WBRT. To better understand this rapidly changing landscape, this review outlines the treatment roles and toxicities of WBRT and alternative therapies for the management of brain metastases.

SUBMITTER: Brown PD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6075843 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Evolution or Revolution?

Brown Paul D PD Ahluwalia Manmeet S MS Khan Osaama H OH Asher Anthony L AL Wefel Jeffrey S JS Gondi Vinai V

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20171222 5

An estimated 20% of patients with cancer will develop brain metastases. Approximately 200,000 individuals in the United States alone receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) each year to treat brain metastases. Historically, the prognosis of patients with brain metastases has been poor; however, with new therapies, this is changing. Because patients are living longer following the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases, there has been rising concern about treatment-related toxicities associa ...[more]

PMID: 29272161

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe benefits of adding upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) when compared to surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases are unclear.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of surgery or SRS plus WBRT with that of surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases in patients with systemic cancer.Search methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to May 2013 and annual meeting proceedings of ASCO and ASTRO up to September 2012 for relevant studies.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgery or SRS plus WBRT with surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors undertook the quality assessment and data extraction. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes include progression free survival (PFS), local and distant intracranial disease progression, neurocognitive function (NF), health related quality of life (HRQL) and neurological adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR), risk ratio (RR), confidence intervals (CI), P-values (P) were estimated with random effects models using Revman 5.1 MAIN RESULTS: We identified five RCTs including 663 patients with one to four brain metastases. The risk of bias associated with lack of blinding was high and impacted to a greater or lesser extent on the quality of evidence for all of the outcomes. Adding upfront WBRT decreased the relative risk of any intracranial disease progression at one year by 53% (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.66, P value < 0.0001, I(2) =34%, Chi(2) P value = 0.21, low quality evidence) but there was no clear evidence of a difference in OS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.48, P value = 0.47, I(2) = 52%, Chi(2) P value = 0.08, low quality evidence) and PFS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.10, P value = 0.14, I(2) = 16%, Chi(2) P value = 0.28, low quality evidence). Subgroup analyses showed that the effects on overall survival were similar regardless of types of focal therapy used, number of brain metastases, dose and sequence of WBRT. The evaluation of the impact of upfront WBRT on NF, HRQL and neurological adverse events was limited by the unclear and high risk of reporting, performance and detection bias, and inconsistency in the instruments and methods used to measure and report results across studies.Authors' conclusionsThere is low quality evidence that adding upfront WBRT to surgery or SRS decreases any intracranial disease progression at one year. There was no clear evidence of an effect on overall and progression free survival. The impact of upfront WBRT on neurocognitive function, health related quality of life and neurological adverse events was undetermined due to the high risk of performance and detection bias, and inconsistency in the instruments and methods used to measure and report results across studies.

Project description:The immune modulatory drug chloroquine (CQ) has been demonstrated to enhance survival following radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma in a clinical trial, but the efficacy in patients with brain metastases is unknown. We hypothesized that short-course CQ during whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) would improve response to local therapy in patients with brain metastases. A prospective, single-cohort study was performed combining WBRT with concurrent CQ to assess both the feasibility of and intracranial response to combined therapy in patients with brain metastases. Safety, tolerability and overall survival of this combination was also examined, along with allelic status of IDO2 (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2), an immune modulatory enzyme inhibited by chloroquine that may affect survival outcomes. CQ therapy (250 mg by mouth daily) was initiated 1 week before WBRT (37.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy daily fractions) in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases from biopsy-proven, primary lung, breast or ovarian solid tumors (n=20). The primary endpoint was radiologic response 3 months after combined CQ and WBRT therapy. Secondary endpoints included toxicity and overall survival. Patients were stratified by IDO2 allelic status. After a median clinical follow up of 5 months (range, 0.5-31), 16 patients were evaluable for radiologic response which was complete response in two patients, partial response in 13 patients and stable disease in one patient. There were no treatment-related grade≥3 toxicities or treatment interruption due to toxicity. Median and mean overall survival was 5.7 and 8.9 months, respectively (range, 0.8-31). A trend toward increased overall survival was observed in patients with wild-type IDO2 compared to patients with heterozygous or homozygous configurations that ablate IDO2 enzyme activity (10.4 mos vs. 4.1 mos.; p=0.07). WBRT with concurrent, short-course CQ is well tolerated in patients with brain metastases. The high intracranial disease control rate warrants additional study.

Dataset Information

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Evolution or Revolution?

Publications

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Evolution or Revolution?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets