Dataset Information

Effectiveness and safety of simeprevir-based regimens for hepatitis C in Italy: The STIly observational study.

ABSTRACT: The combination of the direct-acting antivirals, simeprevir (SMV) and sofosbuvir (SOF), was the first highly efficacious interferon-free combination for treating patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), and was widely used in Italy as a result.The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of SMV in Italian patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 and 4 overall, by treatment regimen [SMV/SOF and SMV/SOF+ribavirin (RBV)], cirrhosis status, and GT (GT1a, GT1b, and GT4).An observational multicenter cohort study was conducted in 46 centers across Italy. Adult HCV + GT1 or GT4 patients, naive or treatment-experienced, with or without cirrhosis, who underwent treatment with a SMV-containing regimen from May to September 2015 were included. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA levels 12 weeks after treatment end (SVR12). The secondary endpoints included duration of treatment, safety and tolerability of each treatment regimen, and SVR by treatment and according to response to previous treatment and fibrosis stage. The association between SVR and a subset of the most clinically relevant variables was investigated by a multivariate logistic regression analysis.A total of 349 HCV-positive patients treated with an SMV-based regimen were enrolled, of whom 342 received SMV/SOF?±?RBV and were included in this analysis. Most patients (59.4%) were treatment-experienced and had cirrhosis (78.1%). In the group receiving SMV/SOF?+?RBV, most (63.1%) were treatment-experienced and 82.9% had cirrhosis. Three patients were lost to follow-up; 330 patients receiving SMV/SOF?±?RBV (96.5%) were treated for 12 weeks. Overall, SVR12 was achieved by 324 patients [94.2%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 92-97]. When stratified by treatment and clinical and virologic characteristics, SVR12 was achieved by 77 of 79 [97.5% (95% CI 94.0-100.0)] and 247 of 263 [93.9% (95% CI 91.0-96.8)] patients receiving SMV/SOF and SMV/SOF?+?RBV, respectively; 132 of 139 (95.0%) naive versus 192/203 (94.6%) treatment-experienced patients; 250 of 267 (93.6%) cirrhotic and 56 of 62 (90.3%) HIV coinfected patients. SMV-based regimens were generally well tolerated. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were not observed.A high proportion of patients treated with SMV/SOF-based regimens achieved SVR12 in this study. A high SVR12 rate was also achieved in patients with cirrhosis, treatment experience, and HUV coinfected patients.

SUBMITTER: Gaeta GB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6076166 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness and safety of simeprevir-based regimens for hepatitis C in Italy: The STIly observational study.

Gaeta Giovanni Battista GB Aghemo Alessio A Menzaghi Barbara B D'Offizi Gianpiero G Giorgini Alessia A Hasson Hamid H Brancaccio Giuseppina G Palma Maria M Termini Roberta R

Medicine 20180701 27

The combination of the direct-acting antivirals, simeprevir (SMV) and sofosbuvir (SOF), was the first highly efficacious interferon-free combination for treating patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), and was widely used in Italy as a result.The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of SMV in Italian patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 and 4 overall, by treatment regimen [SMV/SOF and SMV/SOF+ribavirin (RBV)], cirrhosis status, and GT (GT1a, GT1b, and GT4).An observational mult ...[more]

PMID: 29979400

Similar Datasets

Project description:AIM:To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of telaprevir (TVR)-and simeprevir (SMV)-based triple therapies in elderly patients, specifically patients aged 66 years or older. METHODS:The present study enrolled 112 and 76 Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection who were treated with a 12-wk TVR-based or SMV-based triple therapy, respectively, followed by a dual therapy that included pegylated interferon ? and ribavirin (RBV) for 12 wk. The patients were categorized into two groups according to age as follows: A younger group of patients aged ? 65 years old and an older group of patients aged > 65 years old. Among the patients treated with TVR-based triple therapy, 34 patients were included in the older group. The median ages were 56 years (range: 28-65 years) in the younger group and 69 years (range: 66-81 years) in the older group. Among the patients treated with SMV-based triple therapy, 39 patients were included in the older group. The median ages were 59 years (range: 36-65 years) in the younger group and 71 years (range: 66-86 years) in the older group. The clinical, biochemical and virological data were analyzed before and during treatment. RESULTS:Among the patients treated with the TVR-based triple therapy, no significant difference in the sustained virological response (SVR) was found between the younger (80.8%) and older (88.2%) groups. The SVR rates for patients with the interleukin 28B (IL28B) (rs8099917) TG/GG-genotypes (73.9% and 60.0% in the younger and older groups, respectively) were significantly lower than for patients with the IL28B TT-genotype (86.3% and 92.9%, respectively). The cumulative exposure to RBV for the entire 24-wk treatment period (as a percentage of the target dose) was significantly higher in the younger group than in the older group (91.7% vs 66.7%, respectively, P < 0.01), but the cumulative exposure to TVR was not significantly different between the younger and older groups (91.6% vs 81.9%, respectively). A multivariate analysis identified the TT-genotype of IL28B (OR = 8.160; 95%CI: 1.593-41.804, P = 0.012) and the adherence of RBV (> 60%) (OR = 11.052; 95%CI: 1.160-105.273, P = 0.037) as independent factors associated with the SVR. Adverse events resulted in discontinuation of the treatment in 11.3% and 14.7% of the younger and older groups, respectively. Among the patients treated with the SMV-based triple therapy, no significant difference in the SVR rare was found between the younger (81.1%) and older (82.1%) groups. The SVR rates for patients with the IL28B TG/GG-genotypes (77.8% and 64.7% in the younger and older groups, respectively) were significantly lower than for patients with the IL28B TT-genotype (88.2% and 100%, respectively). A multivariate analysis identified the TT-genotype of IL28B as an independent factor associated with the SVR (OR = 9.677; 95%CI: 1.114-84.087, P = 0.040). Adverse events resulted in discontinuation of the treatment in 7.0% and 14.3% of patients in the younger and older groups, respectively. CONCLUSION:Both TVR- and SMV-based triple therapies can be successfully used to treat patients aged 66 years or older with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C. Genotyping of the IL28B indicates a potential to achieve SVR in these difficult-to-treat elderly patients.

Project description:BackgroundChronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 or 3 can be treated with sofosbuvir without interferon. Because sofosbuvir is costly, its benefits should be compared with the additional resources used.ObjectiveTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based treatments for HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection in the United States.DesignMonte Carlo simulation, including deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.Data sourcesRandomized trials, observational cohorts, and national health care spending surveys.Target population8 patient types defined by HCV genotype (2 vs. 3), treatment history (naive vs. experienced), and cirrhosis status (noncirrhotic vs. cirrhotic).Time horizonLifetime.PerspectivePayer.InterventionSofosbuvir-based therapies, pegylated interferon-ribavirin, and no therapy.Outcome measuresDiscounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).Results of base-case analysisThe ICER of sofosbuvir-based treatment was less than $100,000 per QALY in cirrhotic patients (genotype 2 or 3 and treatment-naive or treatment-experienced) and in treatment-experienced noncirrhotic patients but was greater than $200,000 per QALY in treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients.Results of sensitivity analysisThe ICER of sofosbuvir-based therapy for treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection was less than $100,000 per QALY when the cost of sofosbuvir was reduced by approximately 40% and 60%, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, cost-effectiveness conclusions were robust to uncertainty in treatment efficacy.LimitationThe analysis did not consider possible benefits of preventing HCV transmission.ConclusionSofosbuvir provides good value for money for treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection and those with cirrhosis. At their current cost, sofosbuvir-based regimens for treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients exceed willingness-to-pay thresholds commonly cited in the United States.Primary funding sourceNational Institute on Drug Abuse and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Dataset Information

Effectiveness and safety of simeprevir-based regimens for hepatitis C in Italy: The STIly observational study.

Publications

Effectiveness and safety of simeprevir-based regimens for hepatitis C in Italy: The STIly observational study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets