Dataset Information

Selective COX-2 inhibitor versus non-selective COX-2 inhibitor for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Whether selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has equally efficacy with non-selective NSAIDs in preventing heterotopic ossification (HO) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of selective NSAID versus non-selective NSAIDs for the prevention of HO after THA.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Google Search Engine, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were comparing selective NSAID versus non-selective NSAIDs for preventing HO after THA. The primary outcomes were overall HO incidence, Brooker classification HO incidence, gastrointestinal side effects, the occurrence of excessive bleeding and discontinuation caused by gastrointestinal side effects (DGSE). Data were analyzed using Stata 12.0.

Results

A total of 8 RCTs involving 1636 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the nonselective NSAIDs group and the selective NSAIDs group in the overall incidence of HO (relative risk, RR?=?0.91, 95% confidence intervals, CI 0.78-1.06, P?=?.203), Brooker I HO (RR?=?1.02, 95% CI 0.85-1.23, P?=?.794), Brooker II HO (RR?=?1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.52, P?=?.996). Brooker III HO (RR?=?0.98, 95% CI 0.37-2.62, P?=?.971). And the occurrence of excessive bleeding (RR?=?0.67, 95% CI 0.24-1.92, P?=?.458). The selective NSAIDs group was associated with a significant decrease in gastrointestinal side effects (RR?=?0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.71, P?=?.004) and discontinuation caused by gastrointestinal side effects compared with the nonselective NSAIDs group (RR?=?0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.66, P?=?.004).

Conclusion

The available evidence indicates selective NSAIDs were as effective as non-selective NSAIDs in preventing HO after THA. And selective NSAIDs were associated with less gastrointestinal side effects than non-selective NSAIDs. Considering the limitation of current meta-analysis, more RCTs need to identify the optimal NSAIDs drug for HO after THA.

SUBMITTER: Zhu XT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6081155 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Selective COX-2 inhibitor versus non-selective COX-2 inhibitor for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Zhu Xi-Tian XT Chen Lei L Lin Jian-Hua JH

Medicine 20180801 31

<h4>Background</h4>Whether selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has equally efficacy with non-selective NSAIDs in preventing heterotopic ossification (HO) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of selective NSAID versus non-selective NSAIDs for the prevention of HO after THA.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Google Search Engine, ...[more]

PMID: 30075549

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Few studies exist to inform the extrapolated practice of irradiating children for heterotopic ossification (HO) prevention. We report the incidence of HO formation following prophylactic preoperative compared with postoperative radiation therapy (RT) in children with neuromuscular hip dysplasia (NHD) following proximal femoral resection (PFR). METHODS:A retrospective, 2-institution chart review was performed. Eligibility was limited to patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. Evaluation included radiographic HO grading by a combined severity scale, assessment of synchronous symptoms of pain or decreased range of motion, and stratification by preoperative versus postoperative reception of RT. A control cohort included 4 nonirradiated hips with NHD after PFR. RESULTS:Twenty-five hips in 20 children met eligibility criteria. Eleven hips were irradiated preoperatively and 14 postoperatively. Radiographic evidence of post-RT development of radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification (rHO) was found in all 25 hips and earlier in patients irradiated preoperatively (median time to rHO was 4.0 vs. 15.7?mo, P=0.03, 95% confidence interval, 0.24-21.5). There was no statistically significant difference in the development of symptomatic HO (P=0.62) between the preoperative (45.5%) and postoperative (35.7%) groups, nor in HO grade (P=0.34). Seven (28%) of the 25 hips (5 preoperative and 2 postoperative) had documentation of rHO-free intervals after surgery, with an average duration of 5.6 months, while the remaining presented with rHO at first follow-up visit. All eligible control hips (100%) developed rHO and symptomatic heterotopic ossification. CONCLUSIONS:Perioperative RT did not prevent the formation of HO in any child with NHD after PFR. Extrapolation of evidence of the efficacy of RT for HO prevention in ambulatory adults after traumatic hip injury to a population of children with central nervous system injury and NHD may be premature. Additional studies are needed to clarify optimal prevention of HO in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level III-therapeutic retrospective comparative study.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was developed for younger, active patients as an alternative to THA, but it remains controversial. Study heterogeneity, inconsistent outcome definitions, and unstandardized outcome measures challenge our ability to compare arthroplasty outcomes studies. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES:We asked how early revisions or reoperations (within 5 years of surgery) and overall revisions, adverse events, and postoperative component malalignment compare among studies of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with THA among patients with hip osteoarthritis. Secondarily, we compared the revision frequency identified in the systematic review with revisions reported in four major joint replacement registries. METHODS:We conducted a systematic review of English language studies published after 1996. Adverse events of interest included rates of early failure, time to revision, revision, reoperation, dislocation, infection/sepsis, femoral neck fracture, mortality, and postoperative component alignment. Revision rates were compared with those from four national joint replacement registries. Results were reported as adverse event rates per 1000 person-years stratified by device market status (in use and discontinued). Comparisons between event rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and THA are made using a quasilikelihood generalized linear model. We identified 7421 abstracts, screened and reviewed 384 full-text articles, and included 236. The most common study designs were prospective cohort studies (46.6%; n = 110) and retrospective studies (36%; n = 85). Few randomized controlled trials were included (7.2%; n = 17). RESULTS:The average time to revision was 3.0 years for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (95% CI, 2.95-3.1) versus 7.8 for THA (95% CI, 7.2-8.3). For all devices, revisions and reoperations were more frequent with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing than THA based on point estimates and CIs: 10.7 (95% CI, 10.1-11.3) versus 7.1 (95% CI, 6.7-7.6; p = 0.068), and 7.9 (95% CI, 5.4-11.3) versus 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.2; p = 0.084) per 1000 person-years, respectively. This difference was consistent with three of four national joint replacement registries, but overall national joint replacement registries revision rates were lower than those reported in the literature. Dislocations were more frequent with THA than metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 4.4 (95% CI, 4.2-4.6) versus 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.2; p = 0.008) per 1000 person-years, respectively. Adverse event rates change when discontinued devices were included. CONCLUSIONS:Revisions and reoperations are more frequent and occur earlier with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, except when discontinued devices are removed from the analyses. Results from the literature may be misleading without consistent definitions, standardized outcome metrics, and accounting for device market status. This is important when clinicians are assessing and communicating patient risk and when selecting which device is most appropriate for individual patients.

Dataset Information

Selective COX-2 inhibitor versus non-selective COX-2 inhibitor for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Selective COX-2 inhibitor versus non-selective COX-2 inhibitor for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets