Dataset Information

Analysis of sequencing strategies and tools for taxonomic annotation: Defining standards for progressive metagenomics.

ABSTRACT: Metagenomics research has recently thrived due to DNA sequencing technologies improvement, driving the emergence of new analysis tools and the growth of taxonomic databases. However, there is no all-purpose strategy that can guarantee the best result for a given project and there are several combinations of software, parameters and databases that can be tested. Therefore, we performed an impartial comparison, using statistical measures of classification for eight bioinformatic tools and four taxonomic databases, defining a benchmark framework to evaluate each tool in a standardized context. Using in silico simulated data for 16S rRNA amplicons and whole metagenome shotgun data, we compared the results from different software and database combinations to detect biases related to algorithms or database annotation. Using our benchmark framework, researchers can define cut-off values to evaluate the expected error rate and coverage for their results, regardless the score used by each software. A quick guide to select the best tool, all datasets and scripts to reproduce our results and benchmark any new method are available at https://github.com/Ales-ibt/Metagenomic-benchmark . Finally, we stress out the importance of gold standards, database curation and manual inspection of taxonomic profiling results, for a better and more accurate microbial diversity description.

SUBMITTER: Escobar-Zepeda A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6089906 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Analysis of sequencing strategies and tools for taxonomic annotation: Defining standards for progressive metagenomics.

Escobar-Zepeda Alejandra A Godoy-Lozano Elizabeth Ernestina EE Raggi Luciana L Segovia Lorenzo L Merino Enrique E Gutiérrez-Rios Rosa María RM Juarez Katy K Licea-Navarro Alexei F AF Pardo-Lopez Liliana L Sanchez-Flores Alejandro A

Scientific reports 20180813 1

Metagenomics research has recently thrived due to DNA sequencing technologies improvement, driving the emergence of new analysis tools and the growth of taxonomic databases. However, there is no all-purpose strategy that can guarantee the best result for a given project and there are several combinations of software, parameters and databases that can be tested. Therefore, we performed an impartial comparison, using statistical measures of classification for eight bioinformatic tools and four tax ...[more]

PMID: 30104688

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) offers unprecedented opportunities to expand clinical genomics. It also presents challenges with respect to integration with data from other sequencing methods and historical data. Provision of consistent, clinically applicable variant annotation of NGS data has proved difficult, particularly of indels, an important variant class in clinical genomics. Annotation in relation to a reference genome sequence, the DNA strand of coding transcripts and potential alternative variant representations has not been well addressed. Here we present tools that address these challenges to provide rapid, standardized, clinically appropriate annotation of NGS data in line with existing clinical standards.MethodsWe developed a clinical sequencing nomenclature (CSN), a fixed variant annotation consistent with the principles of the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) guidelines, optimized for automated variant annotation of NGS data. To deliver high-throughput CSN annotation we created CAVA (Clinical Annotation of VAriants), a fast, lightweight tool designed for easy incorporation into NGS pipelines. CAVA allows transcript specification, appropriately accommodates the strand of a gene transcript and flags variants with alternative annotations to facilitate clinical interpretation and comparison with other datasets. We evaluated CAVA in exome data and a clinical BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing pipeline.ResultsCAVA generated CSN calls for 10,313,034 variants in the ExAC database in 13.44 hours, and annotated the ICR1000 exome series in 6.5 hours. Evaluation of 731 different indels from a single individual revealed 92 % had alternative representations in left aligned and right aligned data. Annotation of left aligned data, as performed by many annotation tools, would thus give clinically discrepant annotation for the 339 (46 %) indels in genes transcribed from the forward DNA strand. By contrast, CAVA provides the correct clinical annotation for all indels. CAVA also flagged the 370 indels with alternative representations of a different functional class, which may profoundly influence clinical interpretation. CAVA annotation of 50 BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations from a clinical pipeline gave 100 % concordance with Sanger data; only 8/25 BRCA2 mutations were correctly clinically annotated by other tools.ConclusionsCAVA is a freely available tool that provides rapid, robust, high-throughput clinical annotation of NGS data, using a standardized clinical sequencing nomenclature.

Dataset Information

Analysis of sequencing strategies and tools for taxonomic annotation: Defining standards for progressive metagenomics.

Publications

Analysis of sequencing strategies and tools for taxonomic annotation: Defining standards for progressive metagenomics.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets