Dataset Information

Detection and Interpretation of Impossible and Improbable Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Scores.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To determine the frequency with which specific Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) subscale scores co-occur as a means of providing clinicians and researchers with an empirical method of assessing CRS-R data quality. DESIGN:We retrospectively analyzed CRS-R subscale scores in hospital inpatients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness (DOCs) to identify impossible and improbable subscore combinations as a means of detecting inaccurate and unusual scores. Impossible subscore combinations were based on violations of CRS-R scoring guidelines. To determine improbable subscore combinations, we relied on the Mahalanobis distance, which detects outliers within a distribution of scores. Subscore pairs that were not observed at all in the database (ie, frequency of occurrence=0%) were also considered improbable. SETTING:Specialized DOC program and university hospital. PARTICIPANTS:Patients diagnosed with DOCs (N=1190; coma: n=76, vegetative state: n=464, minimally conscious state: n=586, emerged from minimally conscious state: n=64; 794 men; mean age, 43±20y; traumatic etiology: n=747; time postinjury, 162±568d). INTERVENTIONS:Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:Impossible and improbable CRS-R subscore combinations. RESULTS:Of the 1190 CRS-R profiles analyzed, 4.7% were excluded because they met scoring criteria for impossible co-occurrence. Among the 1137 remaining profiles, 12.2% (41/336) of possible subscore combinations were classified as improbable. CONCLUSIONS:Clinicians and researchers should take steps to ensure the accuracy of CRS-R scores. To minimize the risk of diagnostic error and erroneous research findings, we have identified 9 impossible and 36 improbable CRS-R subscore combinations. The presence of any one of these subscore combinations should trigger additional data quality review.

SUBMITTER: Chatelle C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6095641 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Detection and Interpretation of Impossible and Improbable Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Scores.

Chatelle Camille C Bodien Yelena G YG Carlowicz Cecilia C Wannez Sarah S Charland-Verville Vanessa V Gosseries Olivia O Laureys Steven S Seel Ron T RT Giacino Joseph T JT

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 20160302 8

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the frequency with which specific Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) subscale scores co-occur as a means of providing clinicians and researchers with an empirical method of assessing CRS-R data quality.<h4>Design</h4>We retrospectively analyzed CRS-R subscale scores in hospital inpatients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness (DOCs) to identify impossible and improbable subscore combinations as a means of detecting inaccurate and unusual scores. Impossible sub ...[more]

PMID: 26944708

Similar Datasets

Project description:This study aimed to empirically evaluate the hierarchical structure of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) rating scale categories and their alignment with the Aspen consensus criteria for determining disorders of consciousness (DoC) following a severe brain injury. CRS-R data from 262 patients with DoC following a severe brain injury were analyzed applying the partial credit Rasch Measurement Model. Rasch Analysis produced logit calibrations for each rating scale category. Twenty-eight of the 29 CRS-R rating scale categories were operationalized to the Aspen consensus criteria. We expected the hierarchical order of the calibrations to reflect Aspen consensus criteria. We also examined the association between the CRS-R Rasch person measures (indicative of performance ability) and states of consciousness as determined by the Aspen consensus criteria. Overall, the order of the 29 rating scale category calibrations reflected current literature regarding the continuum of neurobehavioral function: category 6 "Functional Object Use" of the Motor item was hardest for patients to achieve; category 0 "None" of the Oromotor/Verbal item was easiest to achieve. Of the 29 rating scale categories, six were not ordered as expected. Four rating scale categories reflecting the Vegetative State (VS)/Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS) had higher calibrations (reflecting greater neurobehavioral function) than the easiest Minimally Conscious State (MCS) item (category 2 "Fixation" of the Visual item). Two rating scale categories, one reflecting MCS and one not operationalized to the Aspen consensus criteria, had higher calibrations than the easiest eMCS item (category 2 "Functional: Accurate" of the Communication item). CRS-R person measures (indicating amount of neurobehavioral function) and states of consciousness, based on Aspen consensus criteria, showed a strong correlation (rs = 0.86; p < 0.01). Our study provides empirical evidence for revising the diagnostic criteria for MCS to also include category 2 "Localization to Sound" of the Auditory item and for Emerged from Minimally Conscious State (eMCS) to include category 4 "Consistent Movement to Command" of the Auditory item.

Dataset Information

Detection and Interpretation of Impossible and Improbable Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Scores.

Publications

Detection and Interpretation of Impossible and Improbable Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Scores.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets