Dataset Information

A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:We compared efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine therapy followed by capecitabine for maintenance (PACX) versus cisplatin/capecitabine therapy (XP) in advanced gastric cancer. METHODS:Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in China (December 2009-February 2014). Adults (n = 320) with histologically confirmed, untreated metastatic/unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; with ? 1 measureable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 criteria; Karnofsky performance score ? 70 and life expectancy ? 3 months were randomized (1:1) to PACX or XP. PACX group received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenous on days 1 and 8; capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally BD on days 1-14, followed by a 7-day rest interval for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance capecitabine at same dosage/schedule until disease progression, unendurable adverse events or death. XP group received cisplatin intravenous 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine at same dosage/schedule as PACX group per cycle for 6 cycles. RESULTS:Median progression-free survival (5.0 versus 5.3 months; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.906; 0.706-1.164; p = 0.44) and overall survival (12.5 versus 11.8 months; hazard ratio: 0.878 [0.685-1.125]; p = 0.30) were not significantly different between PACX and XP groups. Objective response rate was significantly higher (43.1 versus 28.8%; p = 0.012) and disease control rate was similar (77.5 versus 72.5%; p = 0.75) in PACX versus XP, respectively. Quality of life was significantly improved in PACX versus XP after three treatment cycles. Many treatment-related adverse events were significantly lesser in PACX than XP. CONCLUSIONS:First-line chemotherapy with PACX is effective with milder toxicities in advanced gastric cancer, but could not replace XP.

SUBMITTER: Lu Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6097104 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer.

Lu Zhihao Z Zhang Xiaotian X Liu Wei W Liu Tianshu T Hu Bing B Li Wei W Fan Qingxia Q Xu Jianming J Xu Nong N Bai Yuxian Y Pan Yueyin Y Xu Qing Q Bai Wei W Xia Li L Gao Yong Y Wang Wenling W Shu Yongqian Y Shen Lin L

Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 20180227 5

<h4>Background</h4>We compared efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine therapy followed by capecitabine for maintenance (PACX) versus cisplatin/capecitabine therapy (XP) in advanced gastric cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in China (December 2009-February 2014). Adults (n = 320) with histologically confirmed, untreated metastatic/unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; with ≥ 1 measureable lesions according to Response ...[more]

PMID: 29488121

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA recent phase II trial reported prolonged survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (Gem/Cis/nab-P). We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Gem/Cis/nab-P in Asian patients with advanced BTC in a real-world setting.MethodsWe reviewed the data of patients who received Gem/Cis/nab-P for the management of advanced BTC between September 2019 and April 2021 at four institutes in Korea. Patients were classified into the Gem/Cis/nab-P and nab-P addition groups depending on the starting point of nab-P administration.ResultsA total of 178 patients treated with Gem/Cis/nab-P were included in the study. Of these, 43.8% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 34.8% had extrahepatic CCA, and 21.3% had gall bladder cancer. A total of 117 (65.7%) patients received Gem/Cis/nab-P as the first-line treatment, while 61 (34.3%) were treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by nab-P addition. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate in all patients were 42.1% and 84.8%, respectively. The ORR in the Gem/Cis/nab-P group was 47.9%, while that in the nab-P addition group was 31.1%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.9-10.1] and 14.6 months (95% CI, 10.2-19.0), respectively. In patients who received Gem/Cis/nab-P as initial treatment, the median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.9) and the median OS was not-reached (95% CI, not available). Anemia (n = 42, 23.6%), neutropenia (n = 40, 22.5%), and thrombocytopenia (n = 16, 9.0%) were the most common grade 3-4 toxicities. A total of 20 patients (11.2%) had conversions from unresectable to resectable disease and underwent surgery with curative intent.ConclusionGem/Cis/nab-P showed favorable real-life efficacy and safety outcomes in Korean patients with advanced BTC, which was consistent with the phase II trial outcomes.

Project description:PURPOSE:This trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil regimen versus the cisplatin plus fluorouracil regimen in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS:Patients with locally advanced ESCC were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group or the cisplatin plus fluorouracil group. The patients in the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group were treated with paclitaxel and fluorouracil one cycle per week in dCRT for five cycles followed by paclitaxel and fluorouracil one cycle per month in consolidation chemotherapy for two cycles. The patients in the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil group were treated with cisplatin and fluorouracil one cycle per month in dCRT for two cycles followed by two cycles in consolidation chemotherapy. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions. The primary end point was 3-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS:Four hundred thirty-six patients with ESCC in six centers were recruited at a 1:1 ratio between April 2012 and July 2015. The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 48.7 months (interquartile range, 42.6-60.9). The 3-year OS was 55.4% in the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group and 51.8% in the cisplatin plus fluorouracil group (hazard ratio, 0.905 [95% CI, 0.698 to 1.172]; P = .448). The 3-year progression-free survival was also not significantly different between the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group and the cisplatin plus fluorouracil group (43.7% v 45.5%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.973 [95% CI, 0.762 to 1.243]; P = .828). Compared with the cisplatin plus fluorouracil group, the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group had significantly lower incidences of acute grade 3 or higher anemia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue (P < .05), but higher incidences of acute grade 3 or higher leukopenia, radiation dermatitis, and radiation pneumonitis (P < .05). CONCLUSION:The paclitaxel plus fluorouracil regimen did not significantly prolong the OS compared with the standard cisplatin plus fluorouracil regimen in dCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Project description:BackgroundPemetrexed and cisplatin is a first-line standard in non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer without targetable mutations. It became the backbone of checkpoint-inhibitor-chemotherapy combinations. Single high doses of cisplatin pose toxicity risks and require hyperhydration, potentially prolonging outpatient application. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy, safety and tolerability of split-dose cisplatin with the standard schedule.MethodsPatients with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to up to six 21-day cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm A), or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (day 1) and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 (day 1 + 8, arm B), followed by pemetrexed maintenance. Primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary objectives were overall survival, progression-free survival, time to progression, treatment compliance, toxicity profile, and quality of life.ResultsWe enrolled 130 patients (129 evaluable). Median cycle numbers in A and B were six (1-6) and five (1-6). Dose intensities were comparable between arms. More patients in A received pemetrexed maintenance (24.2% versus 11.1%). With 16 (24.2%) in A and 19 (30.2%) patients in B achieving objective responses [odds ratio 0.74 (0.34-1.62), p = 0.55] the primary endpoint was met. Overall survival was not different between arms (median 14.4 versus 14.9 months); [HR = 1.07; (0.68-1.68), p = 0.78]. Median progression-free survival was 7.0 months in A and 6.2 months in B [HR = 1.63; (1.17-2.38); p = 0.01]. Adverse events of CTCAE grade ⩾3, particularly hematological, were more frequent in B. No difference in grade 4 and 5 infections between arms was noted. Treatment-related asthenia and nausea/vomiting of any grade were more frequent in A. Global health status, fatigue and constipation measured on day 1 of cycle 4 demonstrated superior scores in B.ConclusionPemetrexed and split-dose cisplatin is safe and effective. Advantages of split-dose cisplatin with regard to specific toxicities allow personalization of this important chemotherapy backbone.Trial registrationEuropean Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) number 2011-001963-37.

Project description:PurposeTo compare cisplatin plus fluorouracil (FU) versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naïve advanced anal cancer to establish the optimal regimen.Patients and methodsPatients who had not received systemic therapy for advanced anal cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (day 1) plus FU 1,000 mg/m2 (days 1-4) every 21 days or carboplatin (area under the curve, 5; day 1) plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, and 15) every 28 days for 24 weeks, until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Primary and secondary end points were assessed in a hierarchic model to compare the regimens and pick the winner.ResultsWe conducted an international multicenter randomized phase II study in 60 centers between December 2013 and November 2017. Median follow-up was 28.6 months. A total of 91 patients were randomly assigned: 46 to cisplatin plus FU and 45 to carboplatin plus paclitaxel. ORR was 57% (95% CI, 39.4% to 73.7%) for cisplatin plus FU versus 59% (95% CI, 42.1% to 74.4%) for carboplatin plus paclitaxel. More serious adverse events were noted in the cisplatin plus FU arm (62%) compared with the carboplatin plus paclitaxel arm (36%; P = .016). Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 9.0 months) for cisplatin plus FU compared with 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 8.8 months) for carboplatin plus paclitaxel. Median overall survival was 12.3 months for cisplatin plus FU (95% CI, 9.2 to 17.7 months) compared with 20 months (95% CI, 12.7 months to not reached) for carboplatin plus paclitaxel (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.47; P = .014).ConclusionThis is the first international randomized trial to our knowledge conducted in chemotherapy-naïve advanced anal cancer. Although there was no difference in ORR, the association with clinically relevant reduced toxicity and a trend toward longer survival suggest that carboplatin plus paclitaxel should be considered as a new standard of care.

Project description:ImportanceInduction chemotherapy added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the optimal induction regimen remains unclear.ObjectiveTo determine whether induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (TPC) improves survival vs cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) prior to chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Design, setting, and participantsThis randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial recruited 238 patients at 4 hospitals in China from October 20, 2016, to August 29, 2019. Patients were 18 to 65 years of age with treatment-naive, nonkeratinizing stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive induction chemotherapy with two 21-day cycles of TPC (intravenous paclitaxel [150 mg/m2, day 1], intravenous cisplatin [60 mg/m2, day 1], and oral capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily, days 1-14]) or PF (intravenous cisplatin [100 mg/m2, day 1] and fluorouracil [800 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5]), followed by chemoradiotherapy.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was failure-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, overall survival, tumor response, and safety.ResultsOverall, 238 eligible patients (187 men [78.6%]; median age, 45 years [range, 18-65 years]) were randomly assigned to receive TPC (n = 118) or PF (n = 120). The median follow-up duration was 48.4 months (IQR, 39.6-53.3 months). Failure-free survival at 3 years was 83.5% (95% CI, 77.0%-90.6%) in the TPC group and 68.9% (95% CI, 61.1%-77.8%) in the PF group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79; P = .004). Induction with the TPC regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of distant metastases (stratified HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-0.98]; P = .04) and locoregional recurrence (stratified HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18-0.93]; P = .03) compared with the PF regimen. However, there was no effect on early overall survival (stratified HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.17-1.18]; P = .10). The incidences of grade 3 to 4 acute adverse events and late-onset toxicities were 57.6% (n = 68) and 13.6% (16 of 118), respectively, in the TPC group and 65.8% (n = 79) and 17.9% (21 of 117), respectively, in the PF group. One treatment-related death occurred in the PF group.Conclusions and relevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of TPC for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma improved failure-free survival compared with 2 cycles of PF, with no increase in the toxicity profile.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02940925.

Dataset Information

A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer.

Publications

A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets