Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
To investigate the implications of obtaining one or more low scores on a battery of cognitive tests on diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Design
Observational longitudinal study.Setting
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.Participants
Normal controls (NC, n = 280) and participants with MCI (n = 415) according to Petersen criteria were reclassified using the Jak/Bondi criteria and number of impaired tests (NIT) criteria.Measurements
Diagnostic statistics and hazard ratios of progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) were compared according to diagnostic criteria.Results
The NIT criteria were a better predictor of progression to AD than the Petersen or Jak/Bondi criteria, with optimal sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.Conclusion
Considering normal variability in cognitive test performance when diagnosing MCI may help identify individuals at greatest risk of progression to AD with greater certainty.
SUBMITTER: Oltra-Cucarella J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6097891 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Oltra-Cucarella Javier J Sánchez-SanSegundo Miriam M Lipnicki Darren M DM Sachdev Perminder S PS Crawford John D JD Pérez-Vicente José A JA Cabello-Rodríguez Luis L Ferrer-Cascales Rosario R
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 20180510 7
<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate the implications of obtaining one or more low scores on a battery of cognitive tests on diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI).<h4>Design</h4>Observational longitudinal study.<h4>Setting</h4>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.<h4>Participants</h4>Normal controls (NC, n = 280) and participants with MCI (n = 415) according to Petersen criteria were reclassified using the Jak/Bondi criteria and number of impaired tests (NIT) criteria.<h4>Measurements</ ...[more]