Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Human papilloma virus genotyping for the cross-sectional and longitudinal probability of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more.


ABSTRACT: Human papilloma virus (HPV) testing is more sensitive but less specific than cytology. We evaluated stand-alone genotyping as a possible triage method. During a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing HPV testing to conventional cytology, HPV-positive women were referred to colposcopy and followed up if no high-grade lesion was detected. HPV-positive samples were genotyped by GP5+/GP6+ primed polymerase chain reaction followed by reverse line blot. Genotypes were hierarchically ordered by positive predictive value (PPV) for CIN grade 2 or more (CIN2+), and grouped by cluster analysis into three groups (A, B and C in decreasing order). Receiver operating characteristic curves were computed. Among 2,255 HPV-positive women with genotyping, 239 CIN2+ (including 113 CIN3+) were detected at baseline or during a 3-year follow-up. HPV33 had the highest PPV with CIN2+ and CIN3+ as the endpoint and when considering lesions detected at baseline or also during follow-up. HPV16 and HPV35 were the second and third, respectively. Cross-sectional sensitivity for CIN2+ at baseline was 67.3% (95% CI 59.7-74.2), 91.8% (95% CI 86.6-95.5) and 94.7% (95% CI 90.2-97.6), respectively, when considering as "positive" any of the HPV types in group A (33, 16 and 35), A or B (31, 52, 18, 59 and 58) and A or B or C (39, 51, 56, 45 and 68). The corresponding cross-sectional PPVs for CIN2+ were 15.8% 95% (CI 13.2-18.7), 12.0% (95% CI 10.3-13.9) and 9.6% (95% CI 8.2-11.1), respectively. HPV33, 16 and 35 confer a high probability of CIN2+ but this rapidly decreases when adding other genotypes.

SUBMITTER: Del Mistro A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6099271 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Human papilloma virus genotyping for the cross-sectional and longitudinal probability of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more.

Del Mistro Annarosa A   Adcock Rachael R   Carozzi Francesca F   Gillio-Tos Anna A   De Marco Laura L   Girlando Salvatore S   Rizzolo Raffaella R   Frayle Helena H   Trevisan Morena M   Sani Cristina C   Burroni Elena E   Giorgi Rossi Paolo P   Cuzick Jack J   Ronco Guglielmo G  

International journal of cancer 20180309 2


Human papilloma virus (HPV) testing is more sensitive but less specific than cytology. We evaluated stand-alone genotyping as a possible triage method. During a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing HPV testing to conventional cytology, HPV-positive women were referred to colposcopy and followed up if no high-grade lesion was detected. HPV-positive samples were genotyped by GP5+/GP6+ primed polymerase chain reaction followed by reverse line blot. Genotypes were hierarchically ordered  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10465678 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9515539 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3305644 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8201933 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8060087 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7286376 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10439250 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3499328 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3571257 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7754315 | biostudies-literature