Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Reliability of HR-pQCT Derived Cortical Bone Structural Parameters When Using Uncorrected Instead of Corrected Automatically Generated Endocortical Contours in a Cross-Sectional Study: The Maastricht Study.


ABSTRACT: Most HR-pQCT studies examining cortical bone use an automatically generated endocortical contour (AUTO), which is manually corrected if it visually deviates from the apparent endocortical margin (semi-automatic method, S-AUTO). This technique may be prone to operator-related variability and is time consuming. We examined whether the AUTO instead of the S-AUTO method can be used for cortical bone analysis. Fifty scans of the distal radius and tibia from participants of The Maastricht Study were evaluated with AUTO, and subsequently with S-AUTO by three independent operators. AUTO cortical bone parameters were compared to the average parameters obtained by the three operators (S-AUTOmean). All differences in mean cortical bone parameters between AUTO and S-AUTOmean were ?0.90 for all parameters, except for cortical pore diameter of the radius (0.79) and tibia (0.74) and Ct.Po.V of the tibia (0.89), without systematic errors on the Bland-Altman plots. The precision errors (RMS-CV%) of the radius parameters between S-AUTOmean and AUTO were comparable to those between the individual operators, whereas the tibia RMS-CV% between S-AUTOmean and AUTO were higher than those of the individual operators. Comparison of the three operators revealed clear inter-operator variability. This study suggests that the AUTO method can be used for cortical bone analysis in a cross-sectional study, but that the absolute values-particularly of the porosity-related parameters-will be lower.

SUBMITTER: de Waard EAC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6105151 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Reliability of HR-pQCT Derived Cortical Bone Structural Parameters When Using Uncorrected Instead of Corrected Automatically Generated Endocortical Contours in a Cross-Sectional Study: The Maastricht Study.

de Waard Ellis A C EAC   Sarodnik Cindy C   Pennings Alexander A   de Jong Joost J A JJA   Savelberg Hans H C M HHCM   van Geel Tineke A TA   van der Kallen Carla J CJ   Stehouwer Coen D A CDA   Schram Miranda T MT   Schaper Nicolaas N   Dagnelie Pieter C PC   Geusens Piet P M M PPMM   Koster Annemarie A   van Rietbergen Bert B   van den Bergh Joop P W JPW  

Calcified tissue international 20180329 3


Most HR-pQCT studies examining cortical bone use an automatically generated endocortical contour (AUTO), which is manually corrected if it visually deviates from the apparent endocortical margin (semi-automatic method, S-AUTO). This technique may be prone to operator-related variability and is time consuming. We examined whether the AUTO instead of the S-AUTO method can be used for cortical bone analysis. Fifty scans of the distal radius and tibia from participants of The Maastricht Study were e  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3895089 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9279422 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3706357 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4041600 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4483586 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5486942 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9298023 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5771832 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5540028 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10259492 | biostudies-literature