Dataset Information

Association between intradialytic central venous oxygen saturation and ultrafiltration volume in chronic hemodialysis patients.

ABSTRACT: Background:Cardiac disease is highly prevalent in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Decreased tissue perfusion, including cardiac, due to high ultrafiltration volumes (UFVs) is considered to be one of the drivers of cardiac dysfunction. While central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) is frequently used as an indicator of cardiac output in non-uremic populations, the relationship of ScvO2 and UFV in HD patients remains unclear. Our aim was to determine how intradialytic ScvO2 changes associate with UFV. Methods:We conducted a 6-month retrospective cohort study in maintenance HD patients with central venous catheters as vascular access. Intradialytic ScvO2 was measured with the Critline monitor. We computed treatment-level slopes of intradialytic ScvO2 over time (ScvO2 trend) and applied linear mixed effects models to assess the association between patient-level ScvO2 trends and UFV corrected for body weight (cUFV). Results:We studied 6042 dialysis sessions in 232 patients. In about 62.4% of treatments, ScvO2 decreased. We observed in nearly 80% of patients an inverse relationship between cUFV and ScvO2 trend, indicating that higher cUFV is associated with steeper decline in ScvO2 during dialysis. Conclusions:In most patients, higher cUFV volumes are associated with steeper intradialytic ScvO2 drops. We hypothesize that in a majority of patients the intradialytic cardiac function is fluid dependent, so that in the face of high ultrafiltration rates or volume, cardiac pre-load and consequently cardiac output decreases. Direct measurements of cardiac hemodynamics are warranted to further test this hypothesis.

SUBMITTER: Zhang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6113642 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association between intradialytic central venous oxygen saturation and ultrafiltration volume in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Zhang Hanjie H Chan Lili L Meyring-Wösten Anna A Campos Israel I Preciado Priscila P Kooman Jeroen P JP van der Sande Frank M FM Fuertinger Doris D Thijssen Stephan S Kotanko Peter P

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 20180901 9

<h4>Background</h4>Cardiac disease is highly prevalent in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Decreased tissue perfusion, including cardiac, due to high ultrafiltration volumes (UFVs) is considered to be one of the drivers of cardiac dysfunction. While central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) is frequently used as an indicator of cardiac output in non-uremic populations, the relationship of ScvO2 and UFV in HD patients remains unclear. Our aim was to determine how intradialytic ScvO2 changes associate w ...[more]

PMID: 28927232

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is associated with morbidity. The effect of blood volume-guided ultrafiltration biofeedback, which automatically adjusts fluid removal rate on the basis of blood volume parameters, on the reduction of IDH was tested in a randomized crossover trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:We performed a 22-week, single blind, randomized crossover trial in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who had >30% of sessions complicated by symptomatic IDH in five centers in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period to standardize dialysis prescription and dry weight on the basis of clinical examination. Those meeting inclusion criteria were randomized to best clinical practice hemodialysis (control) or best clinical practice plus blood volume-guided ultrafiltration biofeedback (intervention) for 8 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout and subsequent crossover for a second 8-week phase. The primary outcome was rate of symptomatic IDH. RESULTS:Thirty-five participants entered, 32 were randomized, and 26 completed the study. The rate of symptomatic IDH with biofeedback was 0.10/h (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.14) and 0.07/h (95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.10) during control (P=0.29). There were no differences in the rate or proportion of sessions with asymptomatic IDH or symptoms alone. Results remained consistent when adjusted for randomization order and study week. There were no differences between intervention and control in the last study week in interdialytic weight gain (difference [SD], -0.02 [0.8] kg), brain natriuretic peptide (1460 [19,052] ng/L), cardiac troponins (3 [86] ng/L), extracellular water-to-intracellular water ratio (0.05 [0.33]), ultrafiltration rate (1.1 [7.0] ml/kg per hour), and dialysis recovery time (0.43 [19.25] hours). CONCLUSION:The use of blood volume monitoring-guided ultrafiltration biofeedback in patients prone to IDH did not reduce the rate of symptomatic IDH events.

Project description:BackgroundCentral venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) is often used to help to guide resuscitation of critically ill patients. The standard gold technique for ScvO2 measurement is the co-oximetry (Co-oximetry_ScvO2), which is usually incorporated in most recent blood gas analyzers. However, in some hospitals, those machines are not available and only calculated ScvO2 (Calc_ScvO2) is provided. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the agreement between Co-oximetry_ScvO2 and Calc_ScvO2 in a general population of critically ill patients and septic shock patients.MethodsA total of 100 patients with a central venous catheter were included in the study. One hundred central venous blood samples were collected and analyzed using the same point-of-care blood gas analyzer, which provides both the calculated and measured ScvO2 values. Bland and Altman plot, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and Cohen's Kappa coefficient were used to assess the agreement between Co-oximetry_ScvO2 and Calc_ScvO2. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the independent explanatory variables of the difference between Co-oximetry_ScvO2 and Calc_ScvO2.ResultsIn all population, Bland and Altman's analysis showed poor agreement (+4.5 [-7.1, +16.1]%) between the two techniques. The ICC was 0.754 [(95% CI: 0.393-0.880), P< 0.001], and the Cohen's Kappa coefficient, after categorizing the two variables into two groups using a cutoff value of 70%, was 0.470 (P <0.001). In septic shock patients (49%), Bland and Altman's analysis also showed poor agreement (+5.6 [-6.7 to 17.8]%). The ICC was 0.720 [95% CI: 0.222-0.881], and the Cohen's Kappa coefficient was 0.501 (P <0.001). Four independent variables (PcvO2, Co-oximetry_ScvO2, venous pH, and Hb) were found to be associated with the difference between the measured and calculated ScvO2 (adjusted R2 = 0.8, P<0.001), with PcvO2 being the main independent explanatory variable because of its highest absolute standardized coefficient. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) of PcvO2 to predict Co-oximetry_ScvO2 ? 70% was 0.911 [95% CI: 0.837-0.959], in all patients, and 0.903 [95% CI: 0.784-0.969], in septic shock patients. The best cutoff value was ? 36 mmHg (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 83%), in all patients, and ? 35 mmHg (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 71%) in septic shock patients.ConclusionsThe discrepancy between the measured and calculated ScvO2 is clinically not acceptable. We do not recommend the use of calculated ScvO2 to guide resuscitation in critically ill patients. In situations where the Co-oximetry technique is not available, relying on PcvO2 to predict the measured ScvO2 value above or below 70% could be an option.

Dataset Information

Association between intradialytic central venous oxygen saturation and ultrafiltration volume in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Publications

Association between intradialytic central venous oxygen saturation and ultrafiltration volume in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets