Dataset Information

Combined FET PET/MRI radiomics differentiates radiation injury from recurrent brain metastasis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of combined textural feature analysis of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) and static O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET for the differentiation between local recurrent brain metastasis and radiation injury since CE-MRI often remains inconclusive.

Methods

Fifty-two patients with new or progressive contrast-enhancing brain lesions on MRI after radiotherapy (predominantly stereotactic radiosurgery) of brain metastases were additionally investigated using FET PET. Based on histology (n = 19) or clinicoradiological follow-up (n = 33), local recurrent brain metastases were diagnosed in 21 patients (40%) and radiation injury in 31 patients (60%). Forty-two textural features were calculated on both unfiltered and filtered CE-MRI and summed FET PET images (20-40 min p.i.), using the software LIFEx. After feature selection, logistic regression models using a maximum of five features to avoid overfitting were calculated for each imaging modality separately and for the combined FET PET/MRI features. The resulting models were validated using cross-validation. Diagnostic accuracies were calculated for each imaging modality separately as well as for the combined model.

Results

For the differentiation between radiation injury and recurrence of brain metastasis, textural features extracted from CE-MRI had a diagnostic accuracy of 81% (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 90%). FET PET textural features revealed a slightly higher diagnostic accuracy of 83% (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 75%). However, the highest diagnostic accuracy was obtained when combining CE-MRI and FET PET features (accuracy, 89%; sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 96%).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that combined FET PET/CE-MRI radiomics using textural feature analysis offers a great potential to contribute significantly to the management of patients with brain metastases.

SUBMITTER: Lohmann P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6118093 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDifferentiation between cerebral glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and solitary brain metastasis (MET) is important. The existing radiomic differentiation method ignores the clinical and routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features.PurposeTo differentiate between GBM and MET and between METs from the lungs (MET-lung) and other sites (MET-other) through clinical and routine MRI, and radiomics analyses.Methods and materialsA total of 350 patients were collected from two institutions, including 182 patients with GBM and 168 patients with MET, which were all proven by pathology. The ROI of the tumor was obtained on axial postcontrast MRI which was performed before operation. Seven radiomic feature selection methods and four classification algorithms constituted 28 classifiers in two classification strategies, with the best classifier serving as the final radiomics model. The clinical and combination models were constructed using the nomograms developed. The performance of the nomograms was evaluated in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Student's t-test or the chi-square test was used to assess the differences in the clinical and radiological characteristics between the training and internal validation cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the performance of developed models with the area under the curve (AUC).ResultsThe classifier fisher_decision tree (fisher_DT) showed the best performance (AUC: 0.696, 95% CI:0.608-0.783) for distinguishing between GBM and MET in internal validation cohorts; the classifier reliefF_random forest (reliefF_RF) showed the best performance (AUC: 0.759, 95% CI: 0.613-0.904) for distinguishing between MET-lung and MET-other in internal validation cohorts. The combination models incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical-radiological characteristics were superior to the clinical-radiological models in the two classification strategies (AUC: 0.764 for differentiation between GBM in internal validation cohorts and MET and 0.759 or differentiation between MET-lung and MET-other in internal validation cohorts). The nomograms showed satisfactory performance and calibration and were considered clinically useful, as revealed in the decision curve analysis.Data conclusionThe combination of radiomic and non-radiomic features is helpful for the differentiation among GBM, MET-lung, and MET-other.

Project description:ObjectiveAnlotinib is a multitarget anti-angiogenic drug that combined with temozolomide (TMZ) can effectively prolongs the overall survival (OS) of recurrent malignant glioma(rMG),but some patients do not respond to anlotinib combined with TMZ. These patients were associated with a worse prognosis and lack effective identification methods. Therefore, it is necessary to differentiate patients who may have good response to anlotinb in combination with TMZ from those who are not, in order to provide personalized targeted therapies.MethodsFifty three rMG patients (42 in training cohort and 11 in testing cohort) receiving anlotinib combined with TMZ were enrolled. A total of 3668 radiomics features were extracted from the recurrent MRI images. Radiomics features are reduced and filtered by hypothesis testing and Least Absolute Shrinkage And Selection (LASSO) regression. Eight machine learning models construct the radiomics model, and then screen out the optimal model. The performance of the model was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness with validation.ResultsFifty three patients with rMG were enrolled in our study. Thirty four patients displayed effective treatment response, showed a higher survival benefits than non-response group, the median progression-free survival(PFS) was 8.53 months versus 5.33 months (p = 0.06) and the median OS was 19.9 months and 7.33 months (p = 0.029), respectively. Three radiomics features were incorporated into the model construction as final variables after LASSO regression analysis. In testing cohort, Logistic Regression (LR) model has the best performance with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.93 compared with other models, which can effectively predict the response of rMG patients to anlotinib in combination with TMZ. The calibration curve confirmed the agreement between the observed actual and prediction probability. Within the reasonable threshold probability range (0.38-0.88), the radiomics model shows good clinical utility.ConclusionsThe above-described radiomics model performed well, which can serve as a clinical tool for individualized prediction of the response to anlotinb combined with TMZ in rMG patients.