Dataset Information

MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: Glioma is the most common central nervous system tumor and associated with poor prognosis. Identifying effective diagnostic biomarkers for glioma is particularly important in order to guide optimizing treatment. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have drawn much attention because of their diagnostic value in diverse cancers, including glioma. We summarized studies to identify the potential diagnostic values of miRNAs in glioma patients. We included articles reporting miRNAs for differentiation of glioma patients from controls. We calculated sensitivities, specificities, and area under the curves (AUC) of individual miRNA and miRNA panels. We found that overall sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of miRNAs in diagnosis of glioma were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.89), 90% (95% CI 0.85-0.93), and 93% (95% CI 0.91-0.95), respectively. Meta-regression analysis showed that the detection of miRNAs expression in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain tissue largely improved the diagnostic accuracy. Likewise, panels of multiple miRNAs could enhance the pooled sensitivity. Moreover, AUC of miR-21 was 0.88, with 86% sensitivity and 94% specificity. This study demonstrated that miRNAs could function as potential diagnosis markers in glioma. Detection of miRNAs in CSF and brain tissue displays high accuracy in the diagnosis of glioma.

SUBMITTER: Zhou Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6125451 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhou Qian Q Liu Jing J Quan Jing J Liu Wenlan W Tan Hui H Li Weiping W

Cancer science 20180803 9

Glioma is the most common central nervous system tumor and associated with poor prognosis. Identifying effective diagnostic biomarkers for glioma is particularly important in order to guide optimizing treatment. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have drawn much attention because of their diagnostic value in diverse cancers, including glioma. We summarized studies to identify the potential diagnostic values of miRNAs in glioma patients. We included articles reporting miRNAs for differentiation of glioma patient ...[more]

PMID: 29949235

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is common and associated with significant mortality. Current screening methods for CRC lack patient compliance. microRNAs (miRNAs), identified in body fluids, are negative regulators of gene expression and are dysregulated in many cancers, including CRC. This paper summarises studies identifying blood-based miRNAs dysregulated in CRC compared with healthy controls in an attempt to evaluate their use as a screening tool for the diagnosis of CRC.MethodsA search of electronic databases (PubMed and EMBASE) and grey literature was performed between January 2002 and April 2016. Studies reporting plasma or serum miRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC compared with healthy controls were selected. Patient demographics, type of patient sample (serum or plasma), method of miRNA detection, type of normalisation, and the number of significantly dysregulated miRNAs identified were recorded. Statistical evaluation of dysregulated miRNAs using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) was performed.ResultsThirty-four studies investigating plasma or serum miRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC were included. A total of 31 miRNAs were found to be either upregulated (n=17) or downregulated (n=14) in CRC cases as compared with controls. Fourteen studies identified panels of ⩾2 dysregulated miRNAs. The highest AUC, 0.943, was identified using a panel of 4 miRNAs with 83.3% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity. Meta-analysis of studies identifying a single dysregulated miRNA in CRC cases compared with controls was performed. Overall sensitivity and specificity of 28 individual miRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC were 76% (95% CI 72%-80%) and 76% (95% CI 72%-80%), respectively, indicating good discriminative ability of miRNAs as biomarkers for CRC. These data did not change with sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsBlood-based miRNAs distinguish patients with CRC from healthy controls with high sensitivity and specificity comparable to other common and invasive currently used screening methods for CRC. In future, miRNAs may be used as a relatively non-invasive blood-based marker for detection of CRC.

Project description:BackgroundSalivary diagnostics and their utility as a nonaggressive approach for breast cancer diagnosis have been extensively studied in recent years. This meta-analysis assesses the diagnostic value of salivary biomarkers in differentiating between patients with breast cancer and controls.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of studies related to salivary diagnostics published in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct, Web of Science (WOS), and Google Scholar. The articles were chosen utilizing inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as assessing their quality. Specificity and sensitivity, along with negative and positive likelihood ratios (NLR and PLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), were calculated based on random- or fixed-effects model. Area under the curve (AUC) and summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) were plotted and evaluated, and Fagan's Nomogram was evaluated for clinical utility.ResultsOur systematic review and meta-analysis included 14 papers containing 121 study units with 8639 adult subjects (4149 breast cancer patients and 4490 controls without cancer). The pooled specificity and sensitivity were 0.727 (95% CI: 0.713-0.740) and 0.717 (95% CI: 0.703-0.730), respectively. The pooled NLR and PLR were 0.396 (95% CI: 0.364-0.432) and 2.597 (95% CI: 2.389-2.824), respectively. The pooled DOR was 7.837 (95% CI: 6.624-9.277), with the AUC equal to 0.801. The Fagan's nomogram showed post-test probabilities of 28% and 72% for negative and positive outcomes, respectively. We also conducted subgroup analyses to determine specificity, sensitivity, DOR, PLR, and NLR based on the mean age of patients (≤52 or >52 years old), saliva type (stimulated and unstimulated saliva), biomarker measurement method (mass spectrometry [MS] and non-MS measurement methods), sample size (≤55 or >55), biomarker type (proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics and proteomics, and reagent-free biophotonic), and nations.ConclusionSaliva, as a noninvasive biomarker, has the potential to accurately differentiate breast cancer patients from healthy controls.

Project description:Backgrounds and Purpose: Currently, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are considered to be non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers in a broad range of tumors. Nevertheless, so far, miRNAs have not been fully applied to the clinic for routine screening in glioma patients. Thus, our goal is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating miRNAs for gliomas via a meta-analysis. The present study is registered on the PROSPERO website, with the number CRD42020195883. Methods: Literature retrieval was implemented in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the established search strategy. We pooled the sensitivity, specificity, and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the included studies using the Stata 14.0 software. In addition, the heterogeneity between studies was assessed via the Q statistics and I 2 values calculated by a Chi-square test. A bivariate random effects model was selected due to significant heterogeneity. Specifically, for exploring the factors influencing the heterogeneity, we implemented subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Ultimately, a Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test was used to estimate the potential publication bias. Results: A total of 18 articles covering 24 studies were included, containing 2,170 glioma patients and 1,456 healthy participants. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.79-0.87), 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80-0.88), 5.3 (95%CI: 4.1-6.8), 0.19 (95%CI: 0.15-0.25), 27 (95%CI: 18-41), and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively. Additionally, the findings revealed that serum miRNAs and miRNA panels presented superior diagnostic performance. Conclusion: Thus, circulating miRNAs have the potential to serve as diagnostic biomarkers for gliomas, but need to be verified via a large pool of prospective studies. Additionally, specific miRNAs still need to be elucidated in the diagnosis of a glioma, especially in the early screening stage. The findings may provide diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for the glioma population.

Dataset Information

MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publications

MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets