Dataset Information

Improvement of the quality payment program by improving data reporting process: an action research.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Successful implementation of pay-for-quality (P4Q) programs mostly depends upon a valid, timely, and reliable data about quality measures generated by providers, and interpreted by payers. The aim of this study was to establish a data reporting method for P4Q program through an action research.

Methods

Qualitative method was used to align theory with action through a three-cycle action research. The study was conducted in September 15, 2015 to March 15, 2017, in East-Azerbaijan, Iran. The purposeful sampling was used to select participants. The participants included healthcare providers, staff in district health centers (DHC), experts, and managers in the provincial primary health center (PPHC). Data was collected by interviews, focus group discussions, and expert panels. Content analysis was used to synthesize the data. In each step, decisions about data reporting methods were made through a consensus of expert panel members.

Results

The most important dimensions of data reporting method were data entry and accuracy, data reporting, data analysis and interpretations, the flexibility of method, and training. By establishment of an online data reporting system for the P4Q program, a major improvement was observed in the documentation of performance data, the satisfaction of health care providers and staff (e.g. either in DHCs or PPHC), improvement of the P4Q program and acceptance of the P4Q program by providers. Following the present study, the online system was expanded in Iran's public health system for data collection and estimating the amount of incentive payments in P4Q program. Moreover, more improvements were achieved by linking the system to EMRs and also, providing automated feedback to providers about their own performance.

Conclusions

A web-based computerized system with the capability of linking medical record and also its ability to provide feedback to healthcare providers was identified as an appropriate method of data reporting in the P4Q program from the viewpoints of participants in this study.

SUBMITTER: Iezadi S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6128004 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Improvement of the quality payment program by improving data reporting process: an action research.

Iezadi Shabnam S Tabrizi Jafar Sadegh JS Ghiasi Akbar A Farahbakhsh Mostafa M Gholipour Kamal K

BMC health services research 20180906 1

<h4>Background</h4>Successful implementation of pay-for-quality (P4Q) programs mostly depends upon a valid, timely, and reliable data about quality measures generated by providers, and interpreted by payers. The aim of this study was to establish a data reporting method for P4Q program through an action research.<h4>Methods</h4>Qualitative method was used to align theory with action through a three-cycle action research. The study was conducted in September 15, 2015 to March 15, 2017, in East-Az ...[more]

PMID: 30189897

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: The European Practice Assessment program provides feedback and outreach visits to primary care practices to facilitate quality improvement in five domains (infrastructure, people, information, finance, and quality and safety). We examined the effectiveness of this program in improving management in primary care practices in Germany, with a focus on the domain of quality and safety. METHODS: In a before-after study, 102 primary care practices completed a practice assessment using the European Practice Assessment instrument at baseline and three years later (intervention group). A comparative group of 102 practices was included that completed their first assessment using this instrument at the time of the intervention group's second assessment. Mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100. RESULTS: We found significant improvements in all domains between the first and second assessments in the intervention group. In the domain of quality and safety, improvements in scores (mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100) were observed in the following dimensions: complaint management (from a mean score of 51.2 at first assessment to 80.7 at second assessment); analysis of critical incidents (from 79.1 to 89.6); and quality development, quality policy (from 40.7 to 55.6). Overall scores at the time of the second assessment were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the comparative group. INTERPRETATION: Primary care practices that completed the European Practice Assessment instrument twice over a three-year period showed improvements in practice management. Our findings show the value of the quality-improvement cycle in the context of practice assessment and the use of established organizational standards for practice management with the Europeaen Practice Assessment.

Project description:STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective analysis of Medicare claims linked to hospital participation in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation's episode-based Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) program for lumbar fusion. OBJECTIVE:To describe the early effects of BPCI participation for lumbar fusion on 90-day reimbursement, procedure volume, reoperation, and readmission. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Initiated on January 1, 2013, BPCI's voluntary bundle payment program provides a predetermined payment for services related to a Diagnosis-Related Group-defined "triggering event" over a defined time period. As an alternative to fee-for-service, these reforms shift the financial risk of care on to hospitals. METHODS:We identified fee-for-service beneficiaries over age 65 undergoing a lumbar fusion in 2012 or 2013, corresponding to the years before and after BPCI initiation. Hospitals were grouped based on program participation status as nonparticipants, preparatory, or risk-bearing. Generalized estimating equation models adjusting for patient age, sex, race, comorbidity, and hospital size were used to compare changes in episode costs, procedure volume, and safety indicators based on hospital BPCI participation. RESULTS:We included 89,605 beneficiaries undergoing lumbar fusion, including 36% seen by a preparatory hospital and 7% from a risk-bearing hospital. The mean age of the cohort was 73.4 years, with 59% women, 92% White, and 22% with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 or more. Participant hospitals had greater procedure volume, bed size, and total discharges. Relative to nonparticipants, risk-bearing hospitals had a slightly increased fusion procedure volume from 2012 to 2013 (3.4% increase vs. 1.6% decrease, P?=?0.119), did not reduce 90-day episode of care costs (0.4% decrease vs. 2.9% decrease, P?=?0.044), increased 90-day readmission rate (+2.7% vs. -10.7%, P?=?0.043), and increased repeat surgery rates (+30.6% vs. +7.1% points, P?=?0.043). CONCLUSION:These early, unintended trends suggest an imperative for continued monitoring of BPCI in lumbar fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3.

Project description:We herein describe an optimal approach for the efficient synthesis of O-desmethylvenlafaxine succinate monohydrate (DVS) with high yield and high purity through 5-step reactions, including benzyl protection of the phenolic hydroxyl group, cyclohexanone condensation, deprotection, cyano reduction, dimethylation, and succinic acid salt formation from p-hydroxybenzene acetonitrile as a starting material. 4-Benzyloxyphenylacetonitrile (Intermediate I) was prepared by the hydroxyl protection of the bromide benzyl-p-hydroxyphenylacetonitrile catalyzed by potassium carbonate with 99.83% purity and 98.92% yields. The 1, 2-nucleophilic addition of intermediate I to cyclohexanone promoted by sodium hydroxide with the homogeneous catalyst (n-Bu)4N+Br− to the preparation of 1-[Cyano(4-benzyloxyphenyl)methyl]cyclohexanol (Intermediate II) was obtained by 99.13% purity and 99.71% yields. Cyclohexanone residues and benzyl bromide residues were trace, and tetrabutylammonium bromide residues were UNDER 0.7 ppm, which further improves the residual standards for genotoxic impurities (GIs). 1-[2-amino-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]cyclohexanol hydrochloride (Intermediate III) was prepared by 10% palladium-carbon under 2.0 MPa up to 98.32% purity and 94.20% yields. O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV) was synthesized by dimethylation of intermediate III with 37% formaldehyde solution and 85% formic acid solution. The highest purity was up to 99.20% and the yield was up to 84.77%. O-desmethylvenlafaxine succinate monohydrate (DVS) was formed from succinic acid and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV) and crystallized in a mixed solvent of acetone and water (3:1) to obtain 99.92% purity and 90.27% yields. The 5-step total yields of desvenlafaxine succinate monohydrate is 71.09%, and its crystal form has characteristic peaks at 5, 10, 21, and 26 min by XRD powder diffraction, which is consistent with the crystalline form I. Compared with conventional synthesis strategy, we revealed a novel and green process with a high total yield, high atomic economy, low environmental pollution, high operational safety, and high residual standards for genotoxic impurities (GIs), which improves drug safety.

Dataset Information

Improvement of the quality payment program by improving data reporting process: an action research.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Improvement of the quality payment program by improving data reporting process: an action research.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets