Dataset Information

Quantification of variation and the impact of biomass in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Recent advances in sequencing technologies and bioinformatics tools have allowed for large-scale microbiome studies that are rapidly advancing medical research. However, small changes in technique or analysis can significantly alter the results and lead to conflicting findings. Quantifying the technical versus biological variation expected in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies and how this variation changes with input biomass is critical to guide meaningful interpretation of the current literature and plan future research. RESULTS:Data were compiled from 469 sequencing libraries across 19 separate targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing runs over a 2.5-year time period. Following removal of contaminant sequences identified from negative controls, 244 samples retained sufficient reads for further analysis. Coefficients of variation for intra- and inter-assay variation from repeated measurements of a bacterial mock community ranged from 8.7 to 37.6% (intra) and 15.6 to 80.5% (inter) for all but one genus of bacteria whose relative abundance was greater than 1%. Intra- versus inter-assay Bray-Curtis pairwise distances for a single stool sample were 0.11 versus 0.31, whereas intra-assay variation from repeat stool samples from the same donor was greater at 0.38 (Wilcoxon p =?0.001). A dilution series of the bacterial mock community was used to assess the effect of input biomass on variability. Pairwise distances increased with more dilute samples, and estimates of relative abundance became unreliable below approximately 100 copies of the 16S rRNA gene per microliter. Using this data, we created a prediction model to estimate the expected variation in microbiome measurements for given input biomass and relative abundance values. CONCLUSIONS:Well-controlled microbiome studies are sufficiently robust to capture small biological effects and can achieve levels of variability consistent with clinical assays. Relative abundance is negatively associated with measures of variability and has a stronger effect on variability than does absolute biomass, suggesting that it is feasible to detect differences in bacterial populations in very low-biomass samples. Further, by quantifying the effect of biomass and relative abundance on compositional variability, we developed a tool for defining the expected variance in a given microbiome study.

SUBMITTER: Bender JM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6131952 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantification of variation and the impact of biomass in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies.

Bender Jeffrey M JM Li Fan F Adisetiyo Helty H Lee David D Zabih Sara S Hung Long L Wilkinson Thomas A TA Pannaraj Pia S PS She Rosemary C RC Bard Jennifer Dien JD Tobin Nicole H NH Aldrovandi Grace M GM

Microbiome 20180910 1

<h4>Background</h4>Recent advances in sequencing technologies and bioinformatics tools have allowed for large-scale microbiome studies that are rapidly advancing medical research. However, small changes in technique or analysis can significantly alter the results and lead to conflicting findings. Quantifying the technical versus biological variation expected in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies and how this variation changes with input biomass is critical to guide meaningful interpretati ...[more]

PMID: 30201048

Similar Datasets

Project description:Microbial communities are commonly studied using culture-independent methods, such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing. However, one challenge in accurately characterizing microbial communities is exogenous bacterial DNA contamination, particularly in low-microbial-biomass niches. Computational approaches to identify contaminant sequences have been proposed, but their performance has not been independently evaluated. To identify the impact of decreasing microbial biomass on polymicrobial 16S rRNA gene sequencing experiments, we created a mock microbial community dilution series. We evaluated four computational approaches to identify and remove contaminants, as follows: (i) filtering sequences present in a negative control, (ii) filtering sequences based on relative abundance, (iii) identifying sequences that have an inverse correlation with DNA concentration implemented in Decontam, and (iv) predicting the sequence proportion arising from defined contaminant sources implemented in SourceTracker. As expected, the proportion of contaminant bacterial DNA increased with decreasing starting microbial biomass, with 80.1% of the most diluted sample arising from contaminant sequences. Inclusion of contaminant sequences led to overinflated diversity estimates and distorted microbiome composition. All methods for contaminant identification successfully identified some contaminant sequences, which varied depending on the method parameters used and contaminant prevalence. Notably, removing sequences present in a negative control erroneously removed >20% of expected sequences. SourceTracker successfully removed over 98% of contaminants when the experimental environments were well defined. However, SourceTracker misclassified expected sequences and performed poorly when the experimental environment was unknown, failing to remove >97% of contaminants. In contrast, the Decontam frequency method did not remove expected sequences and successfully removed 70 to 90% of the contaminants.IMPORTANCE The relative scarcity of microbes in low-microbial-biomass environments makes accurate determination of community composition challenging. Identifying and controlling for contaminant bacterial DNA are critical steps in understanding microbial communities from these low-biomass environments. Our study introduces the use of a mock community dilution series as a positive control and evaluates four computational strategies that can identify contaminants in 16S rRNA gene sequencing experiments in order to remove them from downstream analyses. The appropriate computational approach for removing contaminant sequences from an experiment depends on prior knowledge about the microbial environment under investigation and can be evaluated with a dilution series of a mock microbial community.

Project description:High-throughput phylogenetic 16S rRNA gene analysis has permitted to thoroughly delve into microbial community complexity and to understand host-microbiota interactions in health and disease. The analysis comprises sample collection and storage, genomic DNA extraction, 16S rRNA gene amplification, high-throughput amplicon sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. Low biomass microbiota samples (e.g. biopsies, tissue swabs and lavages) are receiving increasing attention, but optimal standardization for analysis of low biomass samples has yet to be developed. Here we tested the lower bacterial concentration required to perform 16S rRNA gene analysis using three different DNA extraction protocols, three different mechanical lysing series and two different PCR protocols. A mock microbiota community standard and low biomass samples (108, 107, 106, 105 and 104 microbes) from two healthy donor stools were employed to assess optimal sample processing for 16S rRNA gene analysis using paired-end Illumina MiSeq technology. Three DNA extraction protocols tested in our study performed similar with regards to representing microbiota composition, but extraction yield was better for silica columns compared to bead absorption and chemical precipitation. Furthermore, increasing mechanical lysing time and repetition did ameliorate the representation of bacterial composition. The most influential factor enabling appropriate representation of microbiota composition remains sample biomass. Indeed, bacterial densities below 106 cells resulted in loss of sample identity based on cluster analysis for all tested protocols. Finally, we excluded DNA extraction bias using a genomic DNA standard, which revealed that a semi-nested PCR protocol represented microbiota composition better than classical PCR. Based on our results, starting material concentration is an important limiting factor, highlighting the need to adapt protocols for dealing with low biomass samples. Our study suggests that the use of prolonged mechanical lysing, silica membrane DNA isolation and a semi-nested PCR protocol improve the analysis of low biomass samples. Using the improved protocol we report a lower limit of 106 bacteria per sample for robust and reproducible microbiota analysis.

Project description:This study aimed to evaluate the number of 16S rRNA genes in the complete genomes of the bacterial and archaeal species inhabiting the human mouth and to assess how the use of different primer pairs would affect the detection and classification of redundant amplicons and matching amplicons (MAs) from different taxa. A total of 518 oral-bacterial and 191 oral-archaeal complete genomes were downloaded from the NCBI database, and their complete 16S rRNA genes were extracted. The numbers of genes and variants per genome were calculated. Next, 39 primer pairs were used to search for matches in the genomes and obtain amplicons. For each primer, we calculated the number of gene amplicons, variants, genomes, and species detected and the percentage of coverage at the species level with no MAs (SC-NMA). The results showed that 94.09% of oral bacteria and 52.59% of oral archaea had more than one intragenomic 16S rRNA gene. From 1.29% to 46.70% of bacterial species and from 4.65% to 38.89% of archaea detected by the primers had MAs. The best primers were the following (SC-NMA; region; position for Escherichia coli [GenBank version no. J01859.1]): KP_F048-OP_R030 for bacteria (93.55%; V3 to V7; 342 to 1079), KP_F018-KP_R063 for archaea (89.63%; V3 to V9; undefined to 1506), and OP_F114-OP_R121 for both domains (92.52%; V3 to V9; 340 to 1405). In addition to 16S rRNA gene redundancy, the presence of MAs must be controlled to ensure an accurate interpretation of microbial diversity data. The SC-NMA is a more useful parameter than the conventional coverage percentage for selecting the best primer pairs. The pairs used the most in the oral microbiome literature were not among the best performers. IMPORTANCE Hundreds of publications have studied the oral microbiome through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. However, none have assessed the number of 16S rRNA genes in the genomes of oral microbes, or how the use of primer pairs targeting different regions affects the detection of MAs from different taxa. Here, we found that almost all oral bacteria and more than half of oral archaea have more than one intragenomic 16S rRNA gene. The performance of the primer pairs in not detecting MAs increases as the length of the amplicon augments. As none of those most employed in the oral literature were among the best performers, we selected a series of primers to detect bacteria and/or archaea based on their percentage of species detected without MAs. The intragenomic 16S rRNA gene redundancy and the presence of MAs between distinct taxa need to be considered to ensure an accurate interpretation of microbial diversity data.

Project description:Short-amplicon 16S rRNA gene sequencing is currently the method of choice for studies investigating microbiomes. However, comparative studies on differences in procedures are scarce. We sequenced human stool samples and mock communities with increasing complexity using a variety of commonly used protocols. Short amplicons targeting different variable regions (V-regions) or ranges thereof (V1-V2, V1-V3, V3-V4, V4, V4-V5, V6-V8, and V7-V9) were investigated for differences in the composition outcome due to primer choices. Next, the influence of clustering (operational taxonomic units [OTUs], zero-radius OTUs [zOTUs], and amplicon sequence variants [ASVs]), different databases (GreenGenes, the Ribosomal Database Project, Silva, the genomic-based 16S rRNA Database, and The All-Species Living Tree), and bioinformatic settings on taxonomic assignment were also investigated. We present a systematic comparison across all typically used V-regions using well-established primers. While it is known that the primer choice has a significant influence on the resulting microbial composition, we show that microbial profiles generated using different primer pairs need independent validation of performance. Further, comparing data sets across V-regions using different databases might be misleading due to differences in nomenclature (e.g., Enterorhabdus versus Adlercreutzia) and varying precisions in classification down to genus level. Overall, specific but important taxa are not picked up by certain primer pairs (e.g., Bacteroidetes is missed using primers 515F-944R) or due to the database used (e.g., Acetatifactor in GreenGenes and the genomic-based 16S rRNA Database). We found that appropriate truncation of amplicons is essential and different truncated-length combinations should be tested for each study. Finally, specific mock communities of sufficient and adequate complexity are highly recommended.IMPORTANCE In 16S rRNA gene sequencing, certain bacterial genera were found to be underrepresented or even missing in taxonomic profiles when using unsuitable primer combinations, outdated reference databases, or inadequate pipeline settings. Concerning the last, quality thresholds as well as bioinformatic settings (i.e., clustering approach, analysis pipeline, and specific adjustments such as truncation) are responsible for a number of observed differences between studies. Conclusions drawn by comparing one data set to another (e.g., between publications) appear to be problematic and require independent cross-validation using matching V-regions and uniform data processing. Therefore, we highlight the importance of a thought-out study design including sufficiently complex mock standards and appropriate V-region choice for the sample of interest. The use of processing pipelines and parameters must be tested beforehand.

Project description:BackgroundIn the last few years, 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16S rDNA-seq) has seen a surprisingly rapid increase in election rate as a methodology to perform microbial community studies. Despite the considerable popularity of this technique, an exiguous number of specific tools are currently available for proper 16S rDNA-seq count data preprocessing and simulation. Indeed, the great majority of tools have been developed adapting methodologies previously used for bulk RNA-seq data, with poor assessment of their applicability in the metagenomics field. For such tools and the few ones specifically developed for 16S rDNA-seq data, performance assessment is challenging, mainly due to the complex nature of the data and the lack of realistic simulation models. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, no software thought for data simulation are available to directly obtain synthetic 16S rDNA-seq count tables that properly model heavy sparsity and compositionality typical of these data.ResultsIn this paper we present metaSPARSim, a sparse count matrix simulator intended for usage in development of 16S rDNA-seq metagenomic data processing pipelines. metaSPARSim implements a new generative process that models the sequencing process with a Multivariate Hypergeometric distribution in order to realistically simulate 16S rDNA-seq count table, resembling real experimental data compositionality and sparsity. It provides ready-to-use count matrices and comes with the possibility to reproduce different pre-coded scenarios and to estimate simulation parameters from real experimental data. The tool is made available at http://sysbiobig.dei.unipd.it/?q=Software#metaSPARSimand https://gitlab.com/sysbiobig/metasparsim.ConclusionmetaSPARSim is able to generate count matrices resembling real 16S rDNA-seq data. The availability of count data simulators is extremely valuable both for methods developers, for which a ground truth for tools validation is needed, and for users who want to assess state of the art analysis tools for choosing the most accurate one. Thus, we believe that metaSPARSim is a valuable tool for researchers involved in developing, testing and using robust and reliable data analysis methods in the context of 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Dataset Information

Quantification of variation and the impact of biomass in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies.

Publications

Quantification of variation and the impact of biomass in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets