Dataset Information

Artificial Neural Network Enhanced Bayesian PET Image Reconstruction.

ABSTRACT: In positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction, the Bayesian framework with various regularization terms has been implemented to constrain the radio tracer distribution. Varying the regularizing weight of a maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm specifies a lower bound of the tradeoff between variance and spatial resolution measured from the reconstructed images. The purpose of this paper is to build a patch-based image enhancement scheme to reduce the size of the unachievable region below the bound and thus to quantitatively improve the Bayesian PET imaging. We cast the proposed enhancement as a regression problem which models a highly nonlinear and spatial-varying mapping between the reconstructed image patches and an enhanced image patch. An artificial neural network model named multilayer perceptron (MLP) with backpropagation was used to solve this regression problem through learning from examples. Using the BrainWeb phantoms, we simulated brain PET data at different count levels of different subjects with and without lesions. The MLP was trained using the image patches reconstructed with a MAP algorithm of different regularization parameters for one normal subject at a certain count level. To evaluate the performance of the trained MLP, reconstructed images from other simulations and two patient brain PET imaging data sets were processed. In every testing cases, we demonstrate that the MLP enhancement technique improves the noise and bias tradeoff compared with the MAP reconstruction using different regularizing weights thus decreasing the size of the unachievable region defined by the MAP algorithm in the variance/resolution plane.

SUBMITTER: Yang B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6132251 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Artificial Neural Network Enhanced Bayesian PET Image Reconstruction.

Yang Bao B Ying Leslie L Tang Jing J

IEEE transactions on medical imaging 20180601 6

In positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction, the Bayesian framework with various regularization terms has been implemented to constrain the radio tracer distribution. Varying the regularizing weight of a maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm specifies a lower bound of the tradeoff between variance and spatial resolution measured from the reconstructed images. The purpose of this paper is to build a patch-based image enhancement scheme to reduce the size of the unachievable region b ...[more]

PMID: 29870360

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:To develop and evaluate a novel deep learning-based reconstruction framework called SANTIS (Sampling-Augmented Neural neTwork with Incoherent Structure) for efficient MR image reconstruction with improved robustness against sampling pattern discrepancy. METHODS:With a combination of data cycle-consistent adversarial network, end-to-end convolutional neural network mapping, and data fidelity enforcement for reconstructing undersampled MR data, SANTIS additionally utilizes a sampling-augmented training strategy by extensively varying undersampling patterns during training, so that the network is capable of learning various aliasing structures and thereby removing undersampling artifacts more effectively and robustly. The performance of SANTIS was demonstrated for accelerated knee imaging and liver imaging using a Cartesian trajectory and a golden-angle radial trajectory, respectively. Quantitative metrics were used to assess its performance against different references. The feasibility of SANTIS in reconstructing dynamic contrast-enhanced images was also demonstrated using transfer learning. RESULTS:Compared to conventional reconstruction that exploits image sparsity, SANTIS achieved consistently improved reconstruction performance (lower errors and greater image sharpness). Compared to standard learning-based methods without sampling augmentation (e.g., training with a fixed undersampling pattern), SANTIS provides comparable reconstruction performance, but significantly improved robustness, against sampling pattern discrepancy. SANTIS also achieved encouraging results for reconstructing liver images acquired at different contrast phases. CONCLUSION:By extensively varying undersampling patterns, the sampling-augmented training strategy in SANTIS can remove undersampling artifacts more robustly. The novel concept behind SANTIS can particularly be useful for improving the robustness of deep learning-based image reconstruction against discrepancy between training and inference, an important, but currently less explored, topic.

Project description:ObjectiveSimultaneous PET/MRIs vary in their quantitative PET performance due to inherent differences in the physical systems and differences in the image reconstruction implementation. This variability in quantitative accuracy confounds the ability to meaningfully combine and compare data across scanners. In this work, we define image reconstruction parameters that lead to comparable contrast recovery curves across simultaneous PET/MRI systems.MethodThe NEMA NU-2 image quality phantom was imaged on one GE Signa and on one Siemens mMR PET/MRI scanner. The phantom was imaged at 9.7:1 contrast with standard spheres (diameter 10, 13, 17, 22, 28, 37 mm) and with custom spheres (diameter: 8.5, 11.5, 15, 25, 32.5, 44 mm) using a standardized methodology. Analysis was performed on a 30 min listmode data acquisition and on 6 realizations of 5 min from the listmode data. Images were reconstructed with the manufacturer provided iterative image reconstruction algorithms with and without point spread function (PSF) modeling. For both scanners, a post-reconstruction Gaussian filter of 3-7 mm in steps of 1 mm was applied. Attenuation correction was provided from a scaled computed tomography (CT) image of the phantom registered to the MR-based attenuation images and verified to align on the non-attenuation corrected PET images. For each of these image reconstruction parameter sets, contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) were determined for the SUVmean, SUVmax and SUVpeak for each sphere. A hybrid metric combining the root-mean-squared discrepancy (RMSD) and the absolute CRC values was used to simultaneously optimize for best match in CRC between the two scanners while simultaneously weighting toward higher resolution reconstructions. The image reconstruction parameter set was identified as the best candidate reconstruction for each vendor for harmonized PET image reconstruction.ResultsThe range of clinically relevant image reconstruction parameters demonstrated widely different quantitative performance across cameras. The best match of CRC curves was obtained at the lowest RMSD values with: for CRCmean, 2 iterations-7 mm filter on the GE Signa and 4 iterations-6 mm filter on the Siemens mMR, for CRCmax, 4 iterations-6 mm filter on the GE Signa, 4 iterations-5 mm filter on the Siemens mMR and for CRCpeak, 4 iterations-7 mm filter with PSF on the GE Signa and 4 iterations-7 mm filter on the Siemens mMR. Over all reconstructions, the RMSD between CRCs was 1.8%, 3.6% and 2.9% for CRC mean, max and peak, respectively. The solution of 2 iterations-3 mm on the GE Signa and 4 iterations-3 mm on Siemens mMR, both with PSF, led to simultaneous harmonization and with high CRC and low RMSD for CRC mean, max and peak with RMSD values of 2.8%, 5.8% and 3.2%, respectively.ConclusionsFor two commercially available PET/MRI scanners, user-selectable parameters that control iterative updates, image smoothing and PSF modeling provide a range of contrast recovery curves that allow harmonization in harmonization strategies of optimal match in CRC or high CRC values. This work demonstrates that nearly identical CRC curves can be obtained on different commercially available scanners by selecting appropriate image reconstruction parameters.

Project description:PURPOSE:Numerous image reconstruction methodologies for positron emission tomography (PET) have been developed that incorporate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging structural information, producing reconstructed images with improved suppression of noise and reduced partial volume effects. However, the influence of MR structural information also increases the possibility of suppression or bias of structures present only in the PET data (PET-unique regions). To address this, further developments for MR-informed methods have been proposed, for example, through inclusion of the current reconstructed PET image, alongside the MR image, in the iterative reconstruction process. In this present work, a number of kernel and maximum a posteriori (MAP) methodologies are compared, with the aim of identifying methods that enable a favorable trade-off between the suppression of noise and the retention of unique features present in the PET data. METHODS:The reconstruction methods investigated were: the MR-informed conventional and spatially compact kernel methods, referred to as KEM and KEM largest value sparsification (LVS) respectively; the MR-informed Bowsher and Gaussian MR-guided MAP methods; and the PET-MR-informed hybrid kernel and anato-functional MAP methods. The trade-off between improving the reconstruction of the whole brain region and the PET-unique regions was investigated for all methods in comparison with postsmoothed maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM), evaluated in terms of structural similarity index (SSIM), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), bias, and standard deviation. Both simulated BrainWeb (10 noise realizations) and real [18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) three-dimensional datasets were used. The real [18 F]FDG dataset was augmented with simulated tumors to allow comparison of the reconstruction methodologies for the case of known regions of PET-MR discrepancy and evaluated at full counts (100%) and at a reduced (10%) count level. RESULTS:For the high-count simulated and real data studies, the anato-functional MAP method performed better than the other methods under investigation (MR-informed, PET-MR-informed and postsmoothed MLEM), in terms of achieving the best trade-off for the reconstruction of the whole brain and PET-unique regions, assessed in terms of the SSIM, NRMSE, and bias vs standard deviation. The inclusion of PET information in the anato-functional MAP method enables the reconstruction of PET-unique regions to attain similarly low levels of bias as unsmoothed MLEM, while moderately improving the whole brain image quality for low levels of regularization. However, for low count simulated datasets the anato-functional MAP method performs poorly, due to the inclusion of noisy PET information in the regularization term. For the low counts simulated dataset, KEM LVS and to a lesser extent, HKEM performed better than the other methods under investigation in terms of achieving the best trade-off for the reconstruction of the whole brain and PET-unique regions, assessed in terms of the SSIM, NRMSE, and bias vs standard deviation. CONCLUSION:For the reconstruction of noisy data, multiple MR-informed methods produce favorable whole brain vs PET-unique region trade-off in terms of the image quality metrics of SSIM and NRMSE, comfortably outperforming the whole image denoising of postsmoothed MLEM.

Dataset Information

Artificial Neural Network Enhanced Bayesian PET Image Reconstruction.

Publications

Artificial Neural Network Enhanced Bayesian PET Image Reconstruction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets