Dataset Information

P01.013 Long-term analyses of the NOA-08 randomized phase III trial of temozolomide versus radiotherapy for elderly patients with malignant astrocytomas

ABSTRACT: Abstract Background While the NOA-08 trial and the NORDIC Elderly trial suggested an O6-methylguanine DNA-methyl transferase (MGMT) status-tailored use of radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ), recent data from the NCIC CE.6/EORTC 26062 showed that hypofractionated RT plus TMZ was superior to RT for unselected elderly patients with an impact of MGMT for the effect of TMZ. Material and Methods This is the long-term update of the NOA-08 trial (German Cancer Trials Registry ID 386 and NCT01502241) that compared efficacy and safety of RT alone to TMZ alone in elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or glioblastoma (GB), both isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype, using overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint and event-free survival (EFS) as well as efficacy according to MGMT status as major secondary endpoints. NOA-08 had randomized patients (N=412; 39 AA, 373 GB) > 65 years with a Karnofsky performance score ? 60 in electronically generated blocks of variable length without stratification to receive standard RT to 60 Gy in 30 x 2 Gy fractions or TMZ dosed according to tolerance in a one week on/one week off schedule with tolerability dependent dosing. The trial finished enrolment Nov 2 2009 and demonstrated non-inferiority of TMZ compared with RT (p=0·033). Results In the long-term analysis with a data cut-off Apr 1 2018 median OS was 8·2 [7·0–10·0] months for TMZ treatment versus 9·4 [8·1–10·4] months for RT; hazard ratio (HR)=0·93 (95% CI: 0·76-1·15)] of TMZ versus RT did not differ between both arms. Also, median EFS [3·4 [3·2–4·1] months versus 4·6 [4·2–5·0] months did not differ with a HR=1·02 (0·83-1·25)]. MGMT promoter methylation tested in tumor tissue (82/221 patients, 37·1%) was associated with prolonged OS [13·6 [10·1–16·5] versus 8·0 [6·9-9·9] months; HR=0·53 (0·40-0·70), p<0·0001]. Patients with MGMT promoter methylation had longer OS and EFS when treated with TMZ (18·4 [13·9–24·4] months and 8·5 [6·9–13·3] months) versus RT (9·6 [6·4–13·7] months and 4·8 [4·3–6·2] months, HR 0·44 [0.27–0.70], p<0·001 for OS and 0·46 [0.29–0.73], p=0·001 for EFS). Patients without MGMT promoter methylation had shorter EFS and a shorter OS with the usual testing not significant when treated with TMZ (6·7 [5·6–8·2] months and 3·0 [2·6-3·3] months) versus with RT (10·2 [8·0–12·0] months and 4·6 [3·7-6·4] months), HR 1·33 [0·95-1·87], p=0·099 for OS and 1·86 [1·32-2·62], p<0·001 for EFS). Conclusion Also in the long-term analyses, NOA-08 confirms the non-inferiority of TMZ compared with RT in the treatment of elderly patients with WHO grade III or IV astrocytic gliomas. To improve OS and EFS, MGMT promoter methylation is a strong predictive biomarker for the choice between RT and TMZ and offers unexpectedly favorable long-term outcome with initial TMZ monotherapy.

SUBMITTER: Wick A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6144530 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe number of patients age >65 years with malignant gliomas is increasing. Prognosis of these patients is worse compared with younger patients. To determine biological differences among malignant gliomas of different age groups and help to explain the survival heterogeneity seen in the NOA-08 trial, the prevalence and impact of recently established biomarkers for outcome in younger patients were characterized in elderly patients.MethodsPrevalences of mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and histone H3.3 (H3F3A), the glioma cytosine-phosphate-guanine island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP), and methylation of alkylpurine DNA N-glycosylase (APNG) and peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1) promoters were determined in a representative biomarker subset (n = 126 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma) from the NOA-08 trial.ResultsIDH1 mutations (R132H) were detected in only 3/126 patients, precluding determination of an association between IDH mutation and outcome. These 3 patients also displayed the G-CIMP phenotype. None of the IDH1 wild-type tumors were G-CIMP positive. Mutations in H3F3A were absent in all 103 patients sequenced for H3F3A. MassARRAY analysis of the APNG promoter revealed generally low methylation levels and failed to confirm any predictive properties for benefit from alkylating chemotherapy. Neither did PRDX1 promoter methylation show differential methylation or association with outcome in this cohort. In a 170-patient cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas database matched for relevant prognostic factors, age ≥65 years was strongly associated with shorter survival.ConclusionsDespite an age-independent stable frequency of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter hypermethylation, tumors in this age group largely lack prognostically favorable markers established in younger glioblastoma patients, which likely contributes to the overall worse prognosis of elderly patients. However, the survival differences hint at fundamental further differences among malignant gliomas of different age groups.

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND Optimal treatment and role of O6-methylguanine DNA-methyl transferase (MGMT) status in elderly patients is still not defined. METHODS This is the long-term update (LT) of the NOA-08 trial (NCT01502241) that compared efficacy and safety of RT to TMZ in elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or glioblastoma (GB) using overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint and event-free survival (EFS) as well as efficacy according to MGMT status as major secondary endpoints. FINDINGS: In the LT with a data cut-off Apr 1 2018 median OS was 8·2 [7·0–10·0] months for TMZ treatment versus 9·4 [8·1–10·4] months for RT; hazard ratio (HR)=0·93 (95% CI: 0·76-1·15)] of TMZ versus RT did not differ between both arms. Also, median EFS [3·4 [3·2–4·1] months versus 4·6 [4·2–5·0] months 3did not differ with a HR=1·02 (0·83-1·25)]. MGMT promoter methylation tested in tumor tissue (82/221 patients, 37·1%) was associated with prolonged OS [13·6 [10·1–16·5] versus 8·0 [6·9-9·9] months; HR=0·53 (0·40-0·70), p<0·0001]. Patients with MGMT promoter methylation had longer OS and EFS when treated with TMZ (18·4 [13·9–24·4] months and 8·5 [6·9–13·3] months) versus RT (9·6 [6·4–13·7] months and 4·8 [4·3–6·2] months, HR 0·44 [0.27–0.70], p<0·001 for OS and 0·46 [0.29–0.73], p=0·001 for EFS). Patients without MGMT promoter methylation had shorter EFS and a shorter OS with the usual testing not significant when treated with TMZ (6·7 [5·6–8·2] months and 3·0 [2·6-3·3] months) versus with RT (10·2 [8·0–12·0] months and 4·6 [3·7-6·4] months), HR 1·33 [0·95-1·87], p=0·099 for OS and 1·86 [1·32-2·62], p<0·001 for EFS). INTERPRETATION: LT of NOA-08 confirms the non-inferiority of TMZ compared with RT in the treatment of elderly patients with AA or GB. To improve OS and EFS, MGMT promoter methylation is a strong predictive biomarker for the choice between RT and TMZ and offers unexpectedly favorable long-term outcome with initial TMZ monotherapy.

Project description:Malignant gliomas are a heterogeneous group of primary central nervous system neoplasms that represent less than 2% of all cancers yet carry a significant burden to society. They are frequently associated with considerable and progressive neurological disability and are ultimately intractable to all forms of treatment. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a new second generation DNA alkylating agent that has become part of malignant astrocytoma management paradigms because of its proven efficacy, ease of administration, and favorable toxicity profile.To review the role of TMZ in the management of malignant astrocytomas (World Health Organization grades III and IV) including newly diagnosed (n) and recurrent (r) anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) and glioblastomas.A series of pivotal clinical trials have established a role for TMZ in the treatment of malignant astrocytomas. A large phase II trial examining the role of TMZ in rAA showed a response rate of 35%, and a 6-month progression-free survival of 46%. This led to the accelerated approval of TMZ by the FDA and the EU for the treatment of rAA. Evidence for a role of TMZ in nAA is currently limited but research is ongoing in this area. The role of TMZ in the management of glioblastoma at the time of recurrence (rGBM) is less impressive but evidence for its activity was demonstrated in two large phase II trials that led to the approval of TMZ for this indication in Europe and Canada but not in the US. A recent large prospective randomized phase III trial showed that the addition of TMZ during and after radiation therapy (RT) in newly diagnosed (nGBM) patients prolonged median overall survival by 2.5 months; perhaps more importantly, the 2-year survival rate for patients receiving TMZ and RT was 26% compared with 10% for those receiving RT alone. Concurrent TMZ with RT followed by adjuvant TMZ has become the standard of care for nGBM patients. Based on the evidence presented in this trial, TMZ received approval from the FDA and the EU for patients with nGBM in 2005.THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE USE OF TMZ FOR THE FOLLOWING DISEASES IN THE ORDER OF MOST TO LEAST CONVINCING: nGBM, rAA, rGBM, and nAA. This order may quickly change as more trials are being designed and implemented, particularly with novel TMZ dosing schedules.

Project description:The optimization of the management for elderly glioblastoma patients is crucial given the demographics of aging in many countries. We report the outcomes for a "real-life" patient cohort (i.e. unselected) comprising consecutive glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or more, treated with different radiotherapy +/- temozolomide regimens.From 2003 to 2016, 104 patients ??70 years of age, consecutively treated by radiotherapy for glioblastoma, were included in this study. All patients were diagnosed with IDH-wild type glioblastoma according to pathological criteria.Our patient cohort comprised 51 female patients (49%) and 53 male. The median cohort age was 75 years (70-88), and the median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 70 (30-100). Five (5%) patients underwent macroscopic complete resection, 9 (9%) had partial resection, and 90 (86%), a stereotactic biopsy. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 33/73 cases (45%). Fifty-two (50%), 38 (36%), and 14 (14%) patients were categorized with RPA scores of III, IV, and I-II. Thirty-three (32%) patients received normofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy, 30 sessions) with temozolomide (Stupp), 37 (35%) received hypofractionated radiotherapy (median dose 40 Gy, 15 sessions) with temozolomide (HFRT?+?TMZ), and 34 (33%) HFRT alone. Patients receiving only HFRT were significantly older, with lower KPSs. The median overall survival (OS; all patients) was 5.2 months. OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months, were 19%, 12%, and 5%, respectively, with no statistical differences between patients receiving Stupp or HFRT?+?TMZ (P?=?0.22). In contrast, patients receiving HFRT alone manifested a significantly shorter survival time (3.9 months vs. 5.9 months, P?=?0.018). In multivariate analyses, the prognostic factors for OS were: i) the type of surgery (HR: 0.47 [0.26-0.86], P?=?0.014), ii) RPA class (HR: 2.15 [1.17-3.95], P?=?0.014), and iii) temozolomide use irrespective of radiotherapy schedule (HR: 0.54 [0.33-0.88], P?<?0.02). MGMT promoter methylation was neither a prognostic nor a predictive factor.These outcomes agree with the literature in terms of optimal surgery and the use of HFRT as a standard treatment for elderly GBM patients. Our study emphasizes the potential benefit of using temozolomide with radiotherapy in a real-life cohort of elderly GBM patients, irrespective of their MGMT status.

Dataset Information

P01.013 Long-term analyses of the NOA-08 randomized phase III trial of temozolomide versus radiotherapy for elderly patients with malignant astrocytomas

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets