Dataset Information

Effect of Increased Inpatient Attending Physician Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety, and Resident Education: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

While the relationship between resident work hours and patient safety has been extensively studied, little research has evaluated the role of attending physician supervision on patient safety.

Objective

To determine the effect of increased attending physician supervision on an inpatient resident general medical service on patient safety and educational outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants

This 9-month randomized clinical trial performed on an inpatient general medical service of a large academic medical center used a crossover design. Participants were clinical teaching attending physicians and residents in an internal medicine residency program.

Interventions

Twenty-two faculty provided either (1) increased direct supervision in which attending physicians joined work rounds on previously admitted patients or (2) standard supervision in which attending physicians were available but did not join work rounds. Each faculty member participated in both arms in random order.

Main outcomes and measures

The primary safety outcome was rate of medical errors. Resident education was evaluated via a time-motion study to assess resident participation on rounds and via surveys to measure resident and attending physician educational ratings.

Results

Of the 22 attending physicians, 8 (36%) were women, with 15 (68%) having more than 5 years of experience. A total of 1259 patients (5772 patient-days) were included in the analysis. The medical error rate was not significantly different between standard vs increased supervision (107.6; 95% CI, 85.8-133.7 vs 91.1; 95% CI, 76.9-104.0 per 1000 patient-days; P = .21). Time-motion analysis of 161 work rounds found no difference in mean length of time spent discussing established patients in the 2 models (202; 95% CI, 192-212 vs 202; 95% CI, 189-215 minutes; P = .99). Interns spoke less when an attending physician joined rounds (64; 95% CI, 60-68 vs 55; 95% CI, 49-60 minutes; P = .008). In surveys, interns reported feeling less efficient (41 [55%] vs 68 [73%]; P = .02) and less autonomous (53 [72%] vs 86 [91%]; P = .001) with an attending physician present and residents felt less autonomous (11 [58%] vs 30 [97%]; P < .001). Conversely, attending physicians rated the quality of care higher when they participated on work rounds (20 [100%] vs 16 [80%]; P = .04).

Conclusions and relevance

Increased direct attending physician supervision did not significantly reduce the medical error rate. In designing morning work rounds, residency programs should reconsider their balance of patient safety, learning needs, and resident autonomy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03318198.

SUBMITTER: Finn KM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6145715 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough there are frequent complaints of medical students' incompetence in reporting errors, few studies have examined their error-reporting abilities in the real world.ObjectivesThree sub-functions of self-regulation theory were used to evaluate medical students' ability to identify errors (self-monitoring), analyse root causes (self-judgment), and devise improvement plans (self-reactions). In addition, whether students reacted differently to their errors and those of others (three sub-functions) was also examined.MethodsA total of 952 patient safety reports were reviewed retrospectively, submitted by third-year medical students between 2016 and 2018. Data were quantitatively and qualitatively analysed to investigate who committed the error, to identify the type of error and its root causes, and to find suggested improvement plans. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare students' responses to error origins.ResultsStudents reported other errors more frequently than their own (67.6% vs. 32.4%). They reported common critical medical errors, including errors related to engaging with patients (34.5%), invasive procedures (20.2%), and infection (18.5%). The root causes identified were more precise than the improvement plans by the students (75.5% vs. 18.4%, respectively). The students' improvement plans were not practical, especially at the patient level (25.8%). When students committed errors, they considered human factors such as fatigue, scheduling, and training as the most common root cause, focussing on improvement plans at the individual level.ConclusionsThe results suggest that students were good at self-judgment, but not at self-monitoring and self-reactions. They reacted differently, based on who committed the error. To enhance self-regulated learning, Educators should encourage students to confront their errors, reflect on their self-reactions towards errors, develop well-being with time management, and think about the meaning of patient-centredness. Finally, active participation in clinical clerkship longitudinally may provide students with opportunities to learn from their errors.

Project description:ImportanceAddressing physician suicide requires understanding its association with possible risk factors such as burnout and depression.ObjectiveTo assess the association between burnout and suicidal ideation after adjusting for depression and the association of burnout and depression with self-reported medical errors.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted from November 12, 2018, to February 15, 2019. Attending and postgraduate trainee physicians randomly sampled from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile were emailed invitations to complete an online survey in waves until a convenience sample of more than 1200 practicing physicians agreed to participate.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the association of burnout with suicidal ideation after adjustment for depression. The secondary outcome was the association of burnout and depression with self-reported medical errors. Burnout, depression, suicidal ideation, and medical errors were measured using subscales of the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel, and Mini-Z burnout survey and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depression Short Form. Associations were evaluated using multivariable regression models.ResultsOf the 1354 respondents, 893 (66.0%) were White, 1268 (93.6%) were non-Hispanic, 762 (56.3%) were men, 912 (67.4%) were non-primary care physicians, 934 (69.0%) were attending physicians, and 824 (60.9%) were younger than 45 years. Each SD-unit increase in burnout was associated with 85% increased odds of suicidal ideation (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.47-2.31). After adjusting for depression, there was no longer an association (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63-1.17). In the adjusted model, each SD-unit increase in depression was associated with 202% increased odds of suicidal ideation (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.30-3.95). In the adjusted model for self-reported medical errors, each SD-unit increase in burnout was associated with an increase in self-reported medical errors (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.28-1.71), whereas depression was not associated with self-reported medical errors (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.88-1.16).Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this cross-sectional study suggest that depression but not physician burnout is directly associated with suicidal ideation. Burnout was associated with self-reported medical errors. Future investigation might examine whether burnout represents an upstream intervention target to prevent suicidal ideation by preventing depression.