Dataset Information

A Seed Expansion Graph Clustering Method for Protein Complexes Detection in Protein Interaction Networks.

ABSTRACT: Most proteins perform their biological functions while interacting as complexes. The detection of protein complexes is an important task not only for understanding the relationship between functions and structures of biological network, but also for predicting the function of unknown proteins. We present a new nodal metric by integrating its local topological information. The metric reflects its representability in a larger local neighborhood to a cluster of a protein interaction (PPI) network. Based on the metric, we propose a seed-expansion graph clustering algorithm (SEGC) for protein complexes detection in PPI networks. A roulette wheel strategy is used in the selection of the seed to enhance the diversity of clustering. For a candidate node u, we define its closeness to a cluster C, denoted as NC(u, C), by combing the density of a cluster C and the connection between a node u and C. In SEGC, a cluster which initially consists of only a seed node, is extended by adding nodes recursively from its neighbors according to the closeness, until all neighbors fail the process of expansion. We compare the F-measure and accuracy of the proposed SEGC algorithm with other algorithms on Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein interaction networks. The experimental results show that SEGC outperforms other algorithms under full coverage.

SUBMITTER: Wang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6150027 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Seed Expansion Graph Clustering Method for Protein Complexes Detection in Protein Interaction Networks.

Wang Jie J Zheng Wenping W Qian Yuhua Y Liang Jiye J

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 20171208 12

Most proteins perform their biological functions while interacting as complexes. The detection of protein complexes is an important task not only for understanding the relationship between functions and structures of biological network, but also for predicting the function of unknown proteins. We present a new nodal metric by integrating its local topological information. The metric reflects its representability in a larger local neighborhood to a cluster of a protein interaction (PPI) network. ...[more]

PMID: 29292776

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundProtein interactions are crucial components of all cellular processes. Recently, high-throughput methods have been developed to obtain a global description of the interactome (the whole network of protein interactions for a given organism). In 2002, the yeast interactome was estimated to contain up to 80,000 potential interactions. This estimate is based on the integration of data sets obtained by various methods (mass spectrometry, two-hybrid methods, genetic studies). High-throughput methods are known, however, to yield a non-negligible rate of false positives, and to miss a fraction of existing interactions. The interactome can be represented as a graph where nodes correspond with proteins and edges with pairwise interactions. In recent years clustering methods have been developed and applied in order to extract relevant modules from such graphs. These algorithms require the specification of parameters that may drastically affect the results. In this paper we present a comparative assessment of four algorithms: Markov Clustering (MCL), Restricted Neighborhood Search Clustering (RNSC), Super Paramagnetic Clustering (SPC), and Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE).ResultsA test graph was built on the basis of 220 complexes annotated in the MIPS database. To evaluate the robustness to false positives and false negatives, we derived 41 altered graphs by randomly removing edges from or adding edges to the test graph in various proportions. Each clustering algorithm was applied to these graphs with various parameter settings, and the clusters were compared with the annotated complexes. We analyzed the sensitivity of the algorithms to the parameters and determined their optimal parameter values. We also evaluated their robustness to alterations of the test graph. We then applied the four algorithms to six graphs obtained from high-throughput experiments and compared the resulting clusters with the annotated complexes.ConclusionThis analysis shows that MCL is remarkably robust to graph alterations. In the tests of robustness, RNSC is more sensitive to edge deletion but less sensitive to the use of suboptimal parameter values. The other two algorithms are clearly weaker under most conditions. The analysis of high-throughput data supports the superiority of MCL for the extraction of complexes from interaction networks.

Dataset Information

A Seed Expansion Graph Clustering Method for Protein Complexes Detection in Protein Interaction Networks.

Publications

A Seed Expansion Graph Clustering Method for Protein Complexes Detection in Protein Interaction Networks.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets