Testing for differential abundance in mass cytometry data.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lun ATL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6155493 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Testing for differential abundance in mass cytometry data.
Lun Aaron T L ATL Richard Arianne C AC Marioni John C JC
Nature methods 20170515 7
When comparing biological conditions using mass cytometry data, a key challenge is to identify cellular populations that change in abundance. Here, we present a computational strategy for detecting 'differentially abundant' populations by assigning cells to hyperspheres, testing for significant differences between conditions and controlling the spatial false discovery rate. Our method (http://bioconductor.org/packages/cydar) outperforms other approaches in simulations and finds novel patterns of ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:MotivationCurrent metagenomics approaches allow analyzing the composition of microbial communities at high resolution. Important changes to the composition are known to even occur on strain level and to go hand in hand with changes in disease or ecological state. However, specific challenges arise for strain level analysis due to highly similar genome sequences present. Only a limited number of tools approach taxa abundance estimation beyond species level and there is a strong need for dedicated tools for strain resolution and differential abundance testing.MethodsWe present DiTASiC ( fferential axa bundance including milarity orrection) as a novel approach for quantification and differential assessment of individual taxa in metagenomics samples. We introduce a generalized linear model for the resolution of shared read counts which cause a significant bias on strain level. Further, we capture abundance estimation uncertainties, which play a crucial role in differential abundance analysis. A novel statistical framework is built, which integrates the abundance variance and infers abundance distributions for differential testing sensitive to strain level.ResultsAs a result, we obtain highly accurate abundance estimates down to sub-strain level and enable fine-grained resolution of strain clusters. We demonstrate the relevance of read ambiguity resolution and integration of abundance uncertainties for differential analysis. Accurate detections of even small changes are achieved and false-positives are significantly reduced. Superior performance is shown on latest benchmark sets of various complexities and in comparison to existing methods.Availability and implementationDiTASiC code is freely available from https://rki_bioinformatics.gitlab.io/ditasic .ContactrenardB@rki.de.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC5870649 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundInnovations in single cell technologies have lead to a flurry of datasets and computational tools to process and interpret them, including analyses of cell composition changes and transition in cell states. The diffcyt workflow for differential discovery in cytometry data consist of several steps, including preprocessing, cell population identification and differential testing for an association with a binary or continuous covariate. However, the commonly measured quantity of survival time in clinical studies often results in a censored covariate where classical differential testing is inapplicable.ResultsTo overcome this limitation, multiple methods to directly include censored covariates in differential abundance analysis were examined with the use of simulation studies and a case study. Results show that multiple imputation based methods offer on-par performance with the Cox proportional hazards model in terms of sensitivity and error control, while offering flexibility to account for covariates. The tested methods are implemented in the R package censcyt as an extension of diffcyt and are available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/censcyt .ConclusionMethods for the direct inclusion of a censored variable as a predictor in GLMMs are a valid alternative to classical survival analysis methods, such as the Cox proportional hazard model, while allowing for more flexibility in the differential analysis.
| S-EPMC8108359 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Advances in DNA sequencing have offered researchers an unprecedented opportunity to better study the variety of species living in and on the human body. However, the analysis of microbiome data is complicated by several challenges. First, the sequencing depth may vary by orders of magnitude across samples. Second, species are rare and the data often contain many zeros. Third, the specimen is a fraction of the microbial ecosystem, and so the data are compositional carrying only relative information. Other characteristics of microbiome data include pronounced over-dispersion in taxon abundances, and the existence of a phylogenetic tree that relates all bacterial species. To address some of these challenges, microbiome analysis workflows often normalize the read counts prior to downstream analysis. However, there are limitations in the current literature on the normalization of microbiome data. RESULTS:Under the multinomial distribution for the read counts and a prior for the unknown proportions, we propose an empirical Bayes approach to microbiome data normalization. Using a tree-based extension of the Dirichlet prior, we further extend our method by incorporating the phylogenetic tree into the normalization process. We study the impact of normalization on differential abundance analysis. In the presence of tree structure, we propose a phylogeny-aware detection procedure. CONCLUSIONS:Extensive simulations and gut microbiome data applications are conducted to demonstrate the superior performance of our empirical Bayes method over other normalization methods, and over commonly-used methods for differential abundance testing. Original R scripts are available at GitHub (https://github.com/liudoubletian/eBay).
| S-EPMC7268703 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Variations of cell-type proportions within tissues could be informative of biological aging and disease risk. Single-cell RNA-sequencing offers the opportunity to detect such differential abundance patterns, yet this task can be statistically challenging due to the noise in single-cell data, inter-sample variability and because such patterns are often of small effect size. Here we present a differential abundance testing paradigm called ELVAR that uses cell attribute aware clustering when inferring differentially enriched communities within the single-cell manifold. Using simulated and real single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-Seq datasets, we benchmark ELVAR against an analogous algorithm that uses Louvain for clustering, as well as local neighborhood-based methods, demonstrating that ELVAR improves the sensitivity to detect cell-type composition shifts in relation to aging, precancerous states and Covid-19 phenotypes. In effect, leveraging cell attribute information when inferring cell communities can denoise single-cell data, avoid the need for batch correction and help retrieve more robust cell states for subsequent differential abundance testing. ELVAR is available as an open-source R-package.
| S-EPMC10241145 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MotivationCell-type abundance data arising from mass cytometry experiments are compositional in nature. Classical association tests do not apply to the compositional data due to their non-Euclidean nature. Existing methods for analysis of cell type abundance data suffer from several limitations for high-dimensional mass cytometry data, especially when the sample size is small.ResultsWe proposed a new multivariate statistical learning methodology, Compositional Data Analysis using Kernels (CODAK), based on the kernel distance covariance (KDC) framework to test the association of the cell type compositions with important predictors (categorical or continuous) such as disease status. CODAK scales well for high-dimensional data and provides satisfactory performance for small sample sizes (n < 25). We conducted simulation studies to compare the performance of the method with existing methods of analyzing cell type abundance data from mass cytometry studies. The method is also applied to a high-dimensional dataset containing different subgroups of populations including Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients and healthy control subjects.Availability and implementationCODAK is implemented using R. The codes and the data used in this manuscript are available on the web at http://github.com/GhoshLab/CODAK/.Contactprudra@okstate.edu.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.
| S-EPMC8867823 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cytometry by Time-Of-Flight (CyTOF) uses antibodies conjugated to isotopically pure metals to identify and quantify a large number of cellular features with single-cell resolution. A barcoding approach allows for 20 unique samples to be pooled and processed together in one tube, reducing the intra-barcode technical variability. However, with only 20 samples per barcode, multiple barcode sets (batches) are required to address questions in robustly powered study designs. A batch adjustment procedure is required to reduce variability across batches and to facilitate direct comparison of runs performed across multiple barcodes run over weeks, months, or years. We describe a method using technical replicates that are included in each run to determine and apply an appropriate adjustment per batch without manual intervention. The use of technical replicate samples (i.e., anchors or reference samples) avoids assumptions of sample homogeneity among batches, and allows direct estimation of batch effects and appropriate adjustment parameters applicable to all samples within a batch. Quantification of cell subpopulations and mean signal intensity pre- and post-adjustment using both manual gating and unsupervised clustering demonstrate substantial mitigation of batch effects in the anchor samples used for this adjustment calculation, and in a second validation set of technical replicates.
| S-EPMC6803429 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Motivation:Mass cytometry or CyTOF is an emerging technology for high-dimensional multiparameter single cell analysis that overcomes many limitations of fluorescence-based flow cytometry. New methods for analyzing CyTOF data attempt to improve automation, scalability, performance and interpretation of data generated in large studies. Assigning individual cells into discrete groups of cell types (gating) involves time-consuming sequential manual steps, untenable for larger studies. Results:We introduce DeepCyTOF, a standardization approach for gating, based on deep learning techniques. DeepCyTOF requires labeled cells from only a single sample. It is based on domain adaptation principles and is a generalization of previous work that allows us to calibrate between a target distribution and a source distribution in an unsupervised manner. We show that DeepCyTOF is highly concordant (98%) with cell classification obtained by individual manual gating of each sample when applied to a collection of 16 biological replicates of primary immune blood cells, even when measured across several instruments. Further, DeepCyTOF achieves very high accuracy on the semi-automated gating challenge of the FlowCAP-I competition as well as two CyTOF datasets generated from primary immune blood cells: (i) 14 subjects with a history of infection with West Nile virus (WNV), (ii) 34 healthy subjects of different ages. We conclude that deep learning in general, and DeepCyTOF specifically, offers a powerful computational approach for semi-automated gating of CyTOF and flow cytometry data. Availability and implementation:Our codes and data are publicly available at https://github.com/KlugerLab/deepcytof.git. Contact:yuval.kluger@yale.edu. Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC5860171 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The arrival of mass cytometry (MC) and, more recently, spectral flow cytometry (SFC) has revolutionized the study of cellular, functional and phenotypic diversity, significantly increasing the number of characteristics measurable at the single-cell level. As a consequence, new computational techniques such as dimensionality reduction and/or clustering algorithms are necessary to analyze, clean, visualize, and interpret these high-dimensional data sets. In this small comparison study, we investigated splenocytes from the same sample by either MC or SFC and compared both high-dimensional data sets using expert gating, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) analysis and FlowSOM. When we downsampled each data set to their equivalent cell numbers and parameters, our analysis yielded highly comparable results. Differences between the data sets only became apparent when the maximum number of parameters in each data set were assessed, due to differences in the number of recorded events or the maximum number of assessed parameters. Overall, our small comparison study suggests that mass cytometry and spectral flow cytometry both yield comparable results when analyzed manually or by high-dimensional clustering or dimensionality reduction algorithms such as t-SNE, UMAP, or FlowSOM. However, large scale studies combined with an in-depth technical analysis will be needed to assess differences between these technologies in more detail. © 2020 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
| S-EPMC7682594 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Mass cytometry uses atomic mass spectrometry combined with isotopically pure reporter elements to currently measure as many as 40 parameters per single cell. As with any quantitative technology, there is a fundamental need for quality assurance and normalization protocols. In the case of mass cytometry, the signal variation over time due to changes in instrument performance combined with intervals between scheduled maintenance must be accounted for and then normalized. Here, samples were mixed with polystyrene beads embedded with metal lanthanides, allowing monitoring of mass cytometry instrument performance over multiple days of data acquisition. The protocol described here includes simultaneous measurements of beads and cells on the mass cytometer, subsequent extraction of the bead-based signature, and the application of an algorithm enabling correction of both short- and long-term signal fluctuations. The variation in the intensity of the beads that remains after normalization may also be used to determine data quality. Application of the algorithm to a one-month longitudinal analysis of a human peripheral blood sample reduced the range of median signal fluctuation from 4.9-fold to 1.3-fold.
| S-EPMC3688049 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MotivationHigh-dimensional mass cytometry (CyTOF) allows the simultaneous measurement of multiple cellular markers at single-cell level, providing a comprehensive view of cell compositions. However, the power of CyTOF to explore the full heterogeneity of a biological sample at the single-cell level is currently limited by the number of markers measured simultaneously on a single panel.ResultsTo extend the number of markers per cell, we propose an in silico method to integrate CyTOF datasets measured using multiple panels that share a set of markers. Additionally, we present an approach to select the most informative markers from an existing CyTOF dataset to be used as a shared marker set between panels. We demonstrate the feasibility of our methods by evaluating the quality of clustering and neighborhood preservation of the integrated dataset, on two public CyTOF datasets. We illustrate that by computationally extending the number of markers we can further untangle the heterogeneity of mass cytometry data, including rare cell-population detection.Availability and implementationImplementation is available on GitHub (https://github.com/tabdelaal/CyTOFmerge).Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC6792069 | biostudies-literature