Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Assessment of Different Root Canal Preparation Techniques with Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments by Novice Students.


ABSTRACT: This study investigated which preparation strategy for root canals leads to the best technical preparation quality, and moreover, which is perceived to be performed best by novice students. Sixty-four students were recruited to prepare one simulated root canal with each of the following: FlexMaster files (F), Mtwo files (M), and Reciproc files (R). After preparation, the students assessed the different instrument systems through a questionnaire. The technical quality of the root canal preparations was evaluated by the centering ratio of the preparation. A total of 186 prepared root canals were submitted for evaluation. With R, significantly better centered preparations were achieved when compared to M and F (p < 0.001). The students evaluated R faster than M and F, and evaluated F significantly (p < 0.05) slower than R and M. M was rated as the easiest system to learn and to handle, as well as the best at reaching the working length; therefore, it was evaluated as the overall favorite of the students. A difference was found between the students' perceptions and their achieved technical quality of root canal preparations.

SUBMITTER: Bartols A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6162720 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Assessment of Different Root Canal Preparation Techniques with Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments by Novice Students.

Bartols Andreas A   Christofzik David W DW   Krummel Matthias M   Friedrichs Christian C   Pousset Tim T   Größner-Schreiber Birte B   Dörfer Christof E CE  

Dentistry journal 20180904 3


This study investigated which preparation strategy for root canals leads to the best technical preparation quality, and moreover, which is perceived to be performed best by novice students. Sixty-four students were recruited to prepare one simulated root canal with each of the following: FlexMaster files (F), Mtwo files (M), and Reciproc files (R). After preparation, the students assessed the different instrument systems through a questionnaire. The technical quality of the root canal preparatio  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6849290 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10990200 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4320282 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8932584 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7299878 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3617459 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10316443 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5527215 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5282372 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4386646 | biostudies-other