Dataset Information

Rationale and Design of the STOP-OB Study for Evaluating the Effects of Tofogliflozin and Glimepiride on Fat Deposition in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Metformin/DPP-4 Inhibitor Dual Therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The global pandemic of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an enormous clinical and socioeconomic burden. Biguanides and DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are the most commonly used therapies in Japanese T2DM patients. When glycemic control is not adequate despite combination of these drugs, there is no consensus on the next step drug. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of previous trials have indicated that glycemic control with triple combination therapies yields similar results. Thus, beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors may be important. The present study was designed to evaluate body fat percentage and several insulin resistance parameters after addition of tofogliflozin or glimepiride to the regimens of patients being treated with metformin and a DPP-4 inhibitor but failing to attain adequate blood glucose control.

Methods

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, tofogliflozin versus glimepiride, comparative trial in patients with type 2 diabetes on body composition is an ongoing, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial. T2DM patients treated with metformin/DPP-4 inhibitor dual therapy have been recruited and randomly assigned to 20 mg/day tofogliflozin (n = 32) or 0.5 mg/day glimepiride (n = 32) groups, with either of these drugs being added to pre-existing regimens for 24 weeks.

Planned outcomes

The primary endpoint is the change in body fat percentage from baseline to 24 weeks. The secondary outcomes are changes in body composition other than fat percentage, body weight, parameters related to glycemic control and β-cell function, parameters related to lipids and arteriosclerosis, parameters related to liver function, parameters related to diabetic nephropathy, and uric acid levels. Safety parameters will also be analyzed. This is the first trial comparing the effects and safety of adding an SGLT2i and a sulfonylurea as the third-line oral agent to metformin/DPP-4i dual therapy. The results will provide valuable information for choosing third-line oral agents.

Trial registration

UMIN000026161.

Funding

Kowa Co. Ltd. and Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

SUBMITTER: Ishihara H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6167289 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a progressive disease that often requires a patient to use multiple antihyperglycemic agents to achieve glycemic control with disease progression. Omarigliptin is a once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor. The purpose of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of adding omarigliptin to the treatment regimen of patients with T2D inadequately controlled by dual therapy with metformin and glimepiride.Patients with T2D and HbA1c ?7.5% and ?10.5% while on metformin (?1500 mg/day) and glimepiride (?4 mg/day) were randomized to omarigliptin 25 mg once-weekly (N = 154) or placebo (N = 153) for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to assess whether omarigliptin was superior to placebo in reducing HbA1c at Week 24. Secondary objectives were to assess the effects of omarigliptin vs. placebo on FPG and the proportion of subjects attaining HbA1c goals of <7% and <6.5%.From a mean baseline HbA1c of 8.5% (omarigliptin) and 8.6% (placebo), the least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 was -0.67% in the omarigliptin group and -0.06% in the placebo group, with a between-group difference (95% CI) of -0.61% (-0.85, -0.38). Treatment with omarigliptin resulted in a significantly greater reduction in FPG relative to placebo (LS mean difference [95% CI] -0.9 mmol/L [-1.4, -0.4]; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients achieving glycemic goals of <7.0% and <6.5% was higher in the omarigliptin group relative to the placebo group. The overall incidences of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, drug-related AEs and discontinuations were generally similar between treatment groups. The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was 10.5% in the omarigliptin group and 8.5% in the placebo group. Relative to baseline, omarigliptin and placebo treatments were associated with LS mean changes in body weight of -0.1 kg and -0.9 kg, respectively.In patients with T2D and inadequate glycemic control on dual therapy with metformin and glimepiride, compared with placebo, once-weekly omarigliptin provided greater improvement in glycemic control and was generally well tolerated.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01704261 , EudraCT Number: 2012-002612-10. Trial Registration Date: October 8, 2012.

Project description:Background:Compound adduct is a eutectic crystal formed by non-covalent bonds of two compounds or multiple compounds with water. Emerging evidence suggests that adduct could be different from the simple physical mixture of the individual compounds and has some new features. Recent studies reported that both glimepiride (Gli) and metformin (Met) may possess an anti-breast cancer effect besides anti-diabetic effect. In the current study, we synthesized glimepiride-metformin adduct (GMA) and examined its anti-breast cancer effect in vitro and in vivo to explore its potential in treatment of breast cancer in diabetic patients. Methods:GMA was synthesized from Gli, Met and water at a molar molecular mass of 1:1:1 and identified by infrared spectroscopy. MTT assay, colony formation assay and wound healing assay were performed to examine the effects of GMA on cell viability and migration of human breast cancer cell lines CAL-148, MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-231and MCF-7. The effect of GMA on cell cycle and apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry. The orthotopic implantation model was established to observe the inhibitory effect of GMA on tumor growth. The expression of Ki67 was detected by immunohistochemistry. RT-qPCR and Western blotting were performed to investigate mechanisms for the function of GMA. Results:Both MTT and colony formation assays showed that GMA inhibited breast cancer cell viability, and the effect was greater than Gli alone, Met alone and the combination. In vivo study showed that GMA had an inhibitory effect on tumor growth of CAL-148 xenografts. Flow cytometry analysis indicated that GMA induced G1/S phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. RT-qPCR and Western blotting analyses showed that GMA activated AMPK, and up-regulated expression of p53 and p21, and down-regulated expression of cyclin D1 and CDK4. Conclusion:GMA suppresses cell viability of breast cancer cells, and its effect is greater than Gli and Met alone or combination at the same concentration. GMA inhibits breast cancer cell growth in vivo. The antitumor effect of GMA may be related to the activation of AMPK resulting in up-regulation of p53 and p21 and down-regulation of cyclin D1 and CDK4.