Dataset Information

Comorbidity Type and Health Care Costs in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Previous studies suggest that the type and combination of comorbidities may impact diabetes care, but their cost implications are less clear. This study characterized how diabetes patients' health care utilization and costs may vary according to comorbidity type classified on the basis of the Piette and Kerr framework.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study of privately insured US adults newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (n = 138,466) using the 2014-2016 Optum Clinformatics^® Data Mart. Diabetes patients were classified into five mutually exclusive comorbidity groups: concordant only, discordant only, both concordant and discordant, any dominant, and none. We estimated average health care costs of each comorbidity group by using generalized linear models, adjusting for patient demographics, region, insurance type, and prior-year costs.

Results

Most type 2 diabetes patients had discordant conditions only (27%), dominant conditions (25%), or both concordant and discordant conditions (24%); 7% had concordant conditions only. In adjusted analyses, comorbidities were significantly associated with higher health care costs (p < 0.0001) and the magnitude of the association varied with comorbidity type. Diabetes patients with dominant comorbidities incurred substantially higher costs ($38,168) compared with individuals with both concordant and discordant conditions ($20,401), discordant conditions only ($9173), concordant conditions only ($9000), and no comorbidities ($3365). More than half of the total costs in our sample (53%) were attributable to 25% of diabetes patients who had dominant comorbidities.

Conclusions

Diabetes patients with both concordant and discordant conditions and with clinically dominant conditions incurred substantially higher health costs than other diabetes patients. Our findings suggest that diabetes management programs must explicitly address concordant, discordant, and dominant conditions because patients may have distinctly different health care needs and utilization patterns depending on their comorbidity profiles. The Piette and Kerr framework may serve as a screening tool to identify high-need, high-cost diabetes patients and suggest targets for tailored interventions.

Funding

Sanofi.

SUBMITTER: Lin PJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6167298 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurogenic disorder associated with progressive loss of muscle function, respiratory failure, and premature mortality. This study aimed to describe and compare real-world health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for US patients with SMA treated with disease-modifying treatments, including onasemnogene abeparvovec, nusinersen, and/or risdiplam.MethodsThis study used claims and structured electronic medical record data from the HealthVerity claims database (January 1, 2017-March 31, 2021). Eligible patients were aged ≤ 2 years at index (treatment initiation or switch), diagnosed with SMA, had ≥ 1 pharmacy/medical claim for onasemnogene abeparvovec, nusinersen, and/or risdiplam, and continuous enrollment ≥ 1 month pre- and ≥ 2 months post-index. SMA-related HCRU and costs during the study period (> 12 months post-index) were compared between treatment groups before and after propensity score weighting. Costs were adjusted to 2021 USD.ResultsOf 74 included patients, 62 (83.8%) received nusinersen and 12 (16.2%) received onasemnogene abeparvovec (monotherapy, n = 9; onasemnogene abeparvovec after nusinersen [switching], n = 3). After weighting, nusinersen-treated patients had greater annual numbers of inpatient (mean 5.3 nusinersen vs. 1.8 onasemnogene abeparvovec) and emergency department (mean 3.0 nusinersen vs. 1.5 onasemnogene abeparvovec; p < 0.05) visits, and greater annual SMA-related medical costs (mean $78,446 nusinersen vs. $29,438 onasemnogene abeparvovec; mean difference $49,007, p < 0.05) than onasemnogene abeparvovec-treated patients. Onasemnogene abeparvovec-treated patients incurred greater SMA-treatment pharmacy costs than nusinersen-treated patients (mean $2,241,875 onasemnogene abeparvovec vs. $693,191 nusinersen; mean difference $1,548,684, p < 0.05).ConclusionsSMA is associated with substantial economic burden. Patients treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec had greater SMA treatment-related pharmacy costs but lower SMA-related HCRU and medical costs compared with patients receiving nusinersen monotherapy.

Project description:IntroductionThe American Diabetes Association (ADA) has identified a target hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 7% as appropriate for most adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This research examines US diabetes-related healthcare costs for adults with T2D for individuals with glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%) compared to poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%).MethodsThe Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart database from 2016 to 2020 was used to identify a cohort of adults with T2D who had a recorded HbA1c test (with first such date identified as the index date) and continuous insurance from 1 year prior through 1 year post index date. Patients with glycemic control were propensity matched to patients with poor glycemic control. Generalized linear models and two-part models examined diabetes-related outpatient, drug, acute care, and total costs over the 1-year post-period.ResultsThere were 34,538 propensity matched individuals included in the study. Results indicate that glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%), compared to poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%) ,was associated with statistically significantly lower annual diabetes-related acute ($5671 ± $4216 vs $6138 ± $4211), outpatient ($6051 ± $4216 vs $7259 ± $7771), drug ($3739 ± $4581 vs $4288 ± $4788), and total costs care ($13,704 ± $10,635 vs $16,460 ± $10,885) (all P < 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses also examined results based upon alternative HbA1c thresholds which were chosen on the basis of expert guidelines and prior clinical trial thresholds (< 6%, ≤ 6.5%, < 8%, and ≤ 9%). In all cases, being below threshold was associated with statistically significantly lower diabetes-related total costs and component costs. Results also illustrate that, in general, higher HbA1c thresholds are associated with higher diabetes-related costs.ConclusionGlycemic control was found to be associated with significantly lower annual diabetes-related component and total costs. Results suggest economic benefits associated with having HbA1c at or below target.

Project description:BackgroundFew contemporary US-based long bone non-union analyses have recently been published. Our study was designed to provide a current understanding of non-union risks and costs, from the payers' perspective.MethodsThe Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used. Patients with surgically treated long bone (femur, tibia, or humerus) fractures in the inpatient setting, from Q4 2015 to most recent, were identified. Exclusion criteria included polytrauma and amputation at index. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of non-union in the 12 and 24 months post-index. Additional outcomes included concurrent infection, reoperation, and total healthcare costs. Age, gender, comorbidities, fracture characteristics, and severity were identified for all patients. Descriptive analyses were performed. Crude and adjusted rates of non-union (using Poisson regressions with log link) were calculated. Marginal incremental cost of care associated with non-union and infected non-union and reoperation were estimated using a generalized linear model with log link and gamma distribution.ResultsA total of 12,770, 13,504, and 4,805 patients with femoral, tibial, or humeral surgically treated fractures were identified, 74-89% were displaced, and 18-27% were comminuted. Two-year rates of non-union reached 8.5% (8.0%-9.1%), 9.1% (8.6%-9.7%), and 7.2% (6.4%-8.1%) in the femoral, tibial, and humeral fracture cohorts, respectively. Shaft fractures were at increased risk of non-union versus fractures in other sites (risk ratio (RR) in shaft fractures of the femur: 2.36 (1.81-3.04); tibia: 1.95 (1.47-2.57); humerus: 2.02 (1.42-2.87)). Fractures with severe soft tissue trauma (open vs. closed, Gustilo III vs. Gustilo I-II) were also at increased risk for non-union (RR for Gustilo III fracture (vs. closed) for femur: R = 1.96 (1.45-2.58), for tibia: 3.33 (2.85-3.87), RR for open (vs. closed) for humerus: 1.74 (1.30-2.32)). For all fractures, younger patients had a reduced risk of non-union compared to older patients. For tibial fractures, increasing comorbidity (Elixhauser Index 5 or greater) was associated with an increased risk of non-union. The two-year marginal cost of non-union ranged from $33K-$45K. Non-union reoperation added $16K-$34K in incremental costs. Concurrent infection further increased costs by $46K-$86K.ConclusionsNon-union affects 7-10% of surgically treated long bone fracture cases. Shaft and complex fractures were at increased risk for non-union.