Dataset Information

Risk factors for spinal cord injury progression after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma: a retrospective case-control study.

ABSTRACT: Study design:Single-center, retrospective case-control study. Objectives:This study aimed to determine the risk factors for progression of neurological symptoms after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma with no or incomplete spinal cord injury. Setting:Community-based hospital with an acute care center in Japan. Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 54 consecutive unstable subaxial cervical spine fracture/dislocation cases that had undergone surgical treatment. A total of 20 patients with no or incomplete spinal cord injury who underwent anterior fusion were identified. Injury characteristics, bony spinal canal diameter (SCD) at the injured level on computed tomography (CT), diagnosis delay of more than 24?h, and other surgery-related parameters were documented as potential risk factors. Results:The study population included 16 male and 4 female patients. The median age was 71.5 (range: 20-88) years. Two cases of SCI progression were identified (AIS E to C5-8 C and AIS D to C5-8 C). Both cases occurred in men who were older than the average age of all the patients. Only delayed diagnosis was significantly associated with the progression of SCI (p?=?0.02). SCDs on CT demonstrated a tendency to be smaller than those of cases without progression, but this was not statistically significant (progression: median, 8.1 [7.2-8.9] mm; no progression: median, 10.1 [4.2-12.6] mm; p?=?0.21). Conclusion:Our results suggested that a delay in diagnosis was associated with neurological progression after ACF. Furthermore, imposing ligamentous flavum might become a compression factor if the diagnosis is delayed.

SUBMITTER: Okano I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6173744 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk factors for spinal cord injury progression after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma: a retrospective case-control study.

Okano Ichiro I Midorikawa Yuki Y Midorikawa Natsuki N Hoshino Yushi Y Sawada Takatoshi T Toyone Tomoaki T Inagaki Katsunori K

Spinal cord series and cases 20181005

<h4>Study design</h4>Single-center, retrospective case-control study.<h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to determine the risk factors for progression of neurological symptoms after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma with no or incomplete spinal cord injury.<h4>Setting</h4>Community-based hospital with an acute care center in Japan.<h4>Methods</h4>We retrospectively reviewed 54 consecutive unstable subaxial cervical spine fracture/dislocation cases that had undergone surgical treatment. A ...[more]

PMID: 30323951

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study designGlobal cross-sectional survey.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to validate the AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification by examining the perceived injury severity by surgeon across AO geographical regions and practice experience.Summary of background dataPrevious subaxial cervical spine injury classifications have been limited by subpar interobserver reliability and clinical applicability. In an attempt to create a universally validated scheme with prognostic value, AO Spine established a subaxial cervical spine injury classification involving four elements: injury morphology, facet injury involvement, neurologic status, and case-specific modifiers.MethodsA survey was sent to 272 AO Spine members across all geographic regions and with a variety of practice experience. Respondents graded the severity of each variable of the classification system on a scale from zero (low severity) to 100 (high severity). Primary outcome was to assess differences in perceived injury severity for each injury type over geographic regions and level of practice experience.ResultsA total of 189 responses were received. Overall, the classification system exhibited a hierarchical progression in subtype injury severity scores. Only three subtypes showed a significant difference in injury severity score among geographic regions: F3 (floating lateral mass fracture, P = 0.04), N3 (incomplete spinal cord injury, P = 0.03), and M2 (critical disk herniation, P = 0.04). When stratified by surgeon experience, pairwise comparison showed only two morphological subtypes, B1 (bony posterior tension band injury, P = 0.02) and F2 (unstable facet fracture, P = 0.03), and one neurologic subtype (N3, P = 0.02) exhibited a significant difference in injury severity score.ConclusionThe AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System has shown to be reliable and suitable for proper patient management. The study shows this classification is substantially generalizable by geographic region and surgeon experience, and provides a consistent method of communication among physicians while covering the majority of subaxial cervical spine traumatic injuries.Level of Evidence: 4.

Project description:Introduction Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] is a slow-motion spinal cord injury. Compression and dynamic compression have been considered disease hallmarks. However, this is likely an oversimplification, as compression is more commonly incidental and has only modest correlation to disease severity. MRI studies have recently suggested spinal cord oscillation could play a role. Research question To determine if spinal cord oscillation could contribute to spinal cord injury in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Material and methods A computational model of an oscillating spinal cord was developed from imaging of a healthy volunteer. Using finite element analysis, the observed implications of stress and strain, were measured in the context of a simulated disc herniation. The significance was bench marked by comparison to a more recognised dynamic injury mechanism; a flexion extension model of dynamic compression. Results Spinal cord oscillation altered both compressive and shear strain on the spinal cord. Following initial compression, compressive strain moves from within the spinal cord to the spinal cord surface, whilst shear strain is magnified by 0.1–0.2, depending on the amplitude of oscillation. These orders of magnitude are equivalent to a dynamic compression model. Discussion and conclusion Spinal cord oscillation could significantly contribute to spinal cord damage across DCM. Its repeated occurrence with every heartbeat, draws parallels to the concept of fatigue damage, which could reconcile differing theories on the origins of DCM. This remains hypothetical at this stage, and further investigations are required. Highlights • Aetiology of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy is poorly understood• Paradigm based purely on ‘compression’ could be an oversimplification• Analysis of a computational model based on an MRI cervical spine• Loading from cord oscillation was equivalent to that from dynamic compression• Proposes a cause of ‘repetitive microtrauma’ warranting further investigation

Project description:Study designMonocenter case-control study.ObjectiveEffects of spinal surgical adverse events (SSAE) on clinical and functional outcome, length of stay, and treatment costs after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).Summary of background dataTraumatic SCI is a challenge for primary care centers because of the emergency setting and complex injury patterns. SSAE rates of up to 15% are reported for spine fractures without SCI. Little is known about SSAE after traumatic SCI and their outcome relevance.MethodsAcute traumatic cervical SCI patients were enrolled from 2011 to 2017. Cases with and without SSAE were compared regarding neurological recovery, functional outcome, secondary complications, mortality, length of stay, and treatment costs. Adjusted logistic regression and generalized estimating equation models were calculated for the endpoints ASIA impairment scale (AIS)-conversion and dysphagia. All analyses were run in the total and in a propensity score matched sample.ResultsAt least one SSAE occurred in 37 of 165 patients (22.4%). Mechanical instability and insufficient spinal decompression were the most frequent SSAE with 13 (7.9%) or 11 (6.7%) cases, respectively. The regression models adjusted for demographic, injury, and surgery characteristics demonstrated a reduced probability for AIS-conversion related to SSAE (OR [95% CI] 0.14 [0.03-0.74]) and additionally to single-sided ventral or dorsal surgical approach (0.12 [0.02-0.69]) in the matched sample. Furthermore, SSAE were associated with higher risk for dysphagia in the matched (4.77 [1.31-17.38]) and the total sample (5.96 [2.07-17.18]). Primary care costs were higher in cases with SSAE (median (interquartile range) 97,300 [78,200-112,300]) EUR compared with cases without SSAE (52,300 [26,700-91,200]) EUR.ConclusionSSAE are an important risk factor after acute traumatic cervical SCI with impact on neurological recovery, functional outcome, and healthcare costs. Reducing SSAE is a viable means to protect the limited intrinsic capacity for recovery from SCI.Level of Evidence: 4.

Dataset Information

Risk factors for spinal cord injury progression after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma: a retrospective case-control study.

Publications

Risk factors for spinal cord injury progression after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma: a retrospective case-control study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets