Dataset Information

Propensity-score-matched evaluation of under-recognition of acute kidney injury and short-term outcomes.

ABSTRACT: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common disease, but diagnosis is usually delayed or missed in hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of under-recognition of AKI (beyond 3 days after AKI onset) on short-time prognosis. Of 785 patients with under-recognition of AKI and 616 patients with timely-recognition of AKI were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio. The two groups, with a total of 482 matched patients (241:241), were comparable in baseline covariates. Under-recognition of AKI was not associated with 30-day all-cause mortality in the logistic regression model with covariate adjustment (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.62-1.64, p = 0.967). Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses also proved the association. There were also no significant differences in causes of 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, recovery of renal function at discharge, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay or hospitalization costs between the two groups, although timely-recognition group had more chance of renal consult and a little more interventions for AKI. In conclusion, under-recognition of AKI may not be associated with poor short-term outcomes of adult hospitalized patients via these propensity-score-matched analyses.

SUBMITTER: Wu B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6181969 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Propensity-score-matched evaluation of under-recognition of acute kidney injury and short-term outcomes.

Wu Buyun B Li Li L Cheng Xiaoyan X Yan Wenyan W Liu Yun Y Xing Changying C Mao Huijuan H

Scientific reports 20181011 1

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common disease, but diagnosis is usually delayed or missed in hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of under-recognition of AKI (beyond 3 days after AKI onset) on short-time prognosis. Of 785 patients with under-recognition of AKI and 616 patients with timely-recognition of AKI were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio. The two groups, with a total of 482 matched patients (241:241), were comparable in baseline covariates. Under-rec ...[more]

PMID: 30310097

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe association between preoperative aspirin use and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in cardiovascular surgery is unclear. We sought to evaluate the effect of preoperative aspirin use on postoperative AKI in cardiac surgery.MethodsA total of 770 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass were reviewed. Perioperative clinical parameters including preoperative aspirin administration were retrieved. We matched 108 patients who took preoperative aspirin continuously with patients who stopped aspirin more than 7 days or did not take aspirin for the month before surgery. The parameters used in the matching included variables related to surgery type, patient's demographics, underlying medical conditions and preoperative medications.ResultsIn the first seven postoperative days, 399 patients (51.8%) developed AKI, as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria and 128 patients (16.6%) required hemodialysis. Most patients took aspirin 100 mg once daily (n = 195, 96.5%) and the remaining 75 mg once daily. Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative maintenance of aspirin was independently associated with decreased incidence of postoperative AKI (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.98, P = 0.048; after propensity score matching: OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.67, P = 0.001). Preoperative maintenance of aspirin was associated with less incidence of AKI defined by KDIGO both in the entire and matched cohort (n = 44 [40.7%] vs. 69 [63.9%] in aspirin and non-aspirin group, respectively in matched sample, relative risk [RR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.49, 0.83, P = 0.001). Preoperative aspirin was associated with decreased postoperative hospital stay after matching (12 [9-18] days vs. 16 [10-25] in aspirin and non-aspirin group, respectively, P = 0.038). Intraoperative estimated or calculated blood loss using hematocrit difference and estimated total blood volume showed no difference according to aspirin administration in both entire and matched cohort.ConclusionsPreoperative low dose aspirin administration without discontinuation was protective against postoperative AKI defined by KDIGO criteria independently in both entire and matched cohort. Preoperative aspirin was also associated with decreased hemodialysis requirements and decreased postoperative hospital stay without increasing bleeding. However, differences in AKI and hospital stay were not associated with in-hospital mortality.

Project description:BackgroundSudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can cause great panic in patients. Whether it is advantageous to add intravenous batroxobin in the treatment of SSNHL remains to be determined. This study aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of therapy combined with intravenous batroxobin and that without intravenous batroxobin in SSNHL patients.MethodsThis retrospective study harvested the data of SSNHL patients hospitalized in our department from January 2008 to April 2021. The hearing levels on the admitted day (before treatment) and the discharge day were considered pre-treatment hearing and post-treatment hearing, respectively. The hearing gain was the difference value of pre-treatment hearing and post-treatment hearing. We used Siegel's criteria and the Chinese Medical Association of Otolaryngology (CMAO) criteria to evaluate hearing recovery. The complete recovery rate, overall effective rate, and hearing gain at each frequency were considered outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics between the batroxobin group and the non-batroxobin group. Sensitivity analysis was carried out in flat-type and total-deafness SSNHL patients.ResultsDuring the study period, 657 patients with SSNHL were admitted to our department. Among them, a total of 274 patients met the enrolled criteria of our study. After PSM, 162 patients (81 in each group) were included in the analysis. Once the hospitalized treatment was completed, the patients would be discharged the next day. Logistic regression analysis of the propensity score-matched cohort indicated that both the complete recovery rates [Siegel's criteria, OR: 0.734, 95% CI: 0.368-1.466, p = 0.381; CMAO criteria, OR: 0.879, 95% CI: 0.435-1.777, p = 0.720] and the overall effective rates [Siegel's criteria and CMAO criteria, OR: 0.741, 95% CI: 0.399-1.378, p = 0.344] were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. Sensitivity analysis has shown similar results. For flat-type and total-deafness SSNHL patients, no significant difference was found in post-treatment hearing gain at each frequency between the two groups after PSM.ConclusionThere was no significant difference in short-term hearing outcomes between treatment with batroxobin and treatment without batroxobin in SSNHL patients by Siegel's and CMAO criteria after PSM. Future studies for better therapy regimens of SSNHL are still needed.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with kidney disease are at high risk for adverse outcomes after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite vaccination. Because patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney failure were excluded from registrational trials, the impact of the protease inhibitor nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in patients with kidney disease is unknown.MethodsThis was a cohort study evaluating adverse outcomes in patients with kidney disease who developed COVID-19. Patients prescribed nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for COVID-19 between March 16, 2022, and November 30, 2022, were propensity score-matched to comparators diagnosed with COVID-19 between July 15, 2021, and March 15, 2022 (before the use of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in our health care network). We determined the association between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and short- and long-term outcomes using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard and Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for potential confounders. Outcomes included 30-day risk of hospitalization and 1-year risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), CKD progression, and death.ResultsA total of 1095 nirmatrelvir-ritonavir-treated patients were matched to 584 comparators. Patients who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir patients were less likely to be hospitalized within 30 days of diagnosis (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.73; P < .01). At 1 year, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir-treated patients had a lower risk of hospitalization for MACE (adjusted sHR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67; P < .01) and death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.65; P < .01). Use of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was not associated with decreased risk of CKD progression or attenuation of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline slope in the year following infection.ConclusionsNirmatrelvir-ritonavir was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization within 30 days and 1-year risk of MACE and death in patients with CKD and kidney failure.

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine the severity and outcome of COVID-19 among individuals with lupus as compared to controls. The secondary objective was to identify the risk association of sex, race, presence of nephritis, and use of various immunomodulators with COVID-19 outcomes.MethodsRetrospective data of individuals with lupus with and without COVID-19 between January 2020 to May 2021 was retrieved from the TriNetX. A one-to-one matched COVID-19 positive control was selected using propensity score(PS) matching. We assessed several outcomes, including all-cause mortality, hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, severe COVID, acute kidney injury (AKI), Haemodialysis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism (VTE) and sepsis were assessed.ResultsWe identified 2140 SLE patients with COVID-19, 29,853 SLE without COVID-19 and 732,291controls. Mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis was comparable among SLE and controls [RR-1.26; 95%CI-0.85,1.8]. SLE with COVID-19 had a higher risk of hospitalisation [RR-1.28; 95% CI 1.14-1.44], ICU admission [RR-1.35; 95% CI 1.01-1.83], mechanical ventilation [RR- 1.58 95% CI 1.07-2.33], stroke [RR-2.18; 95% CI 1.32,3.60], VTE [RR-2.22; 95% CI 1.57-03.12] and sepsis [RR-1.37; 95% CI 1.06-1.78].Individuals with SLE who contracted COVID-19 had higher mortality, hospitalisation, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, AKI, VTE and sepsis (p < 0.001) compared to SLE without COVID-19. Males with SLE had a higher risk of AKI [RR-2.05; 95% CI 1.27-3.31] than females. Lupus nephritis was associated with higher risk of hospitalisation [RR-1.36; 95% CI 1.05-1.76], AKI [RR-2.32; 95% CI 1.50-3.59] and sepsis [RR-2.07; 95% CI-1.12-3.83].ConclusionThe mortality of individuals with SLE due to COVID-19 is comparable to the general population but with higher risks of hospitalisation, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, stroke, VTE and sepsis. The presence of nephritis increases the risk of AKI, thus probably increasing hospitalisation and sepsis.

Dataset Information

Propensity-score-matched evaluation of under-recognition of acute kidney injury and short-term outcomes.

Publications

Propensity-score-matched evaluation of under-recognition of acute kidney injury and short-term outcomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets