Dataset Information

Readability of advance directive documentation in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:In the Canadian context, health literacy has been shown to depend on place of birth, education level, socioeconomic status, language spoken and geographic location. This study seeks to determine whether currently available advance directive documentation in Canada is written in accordance with the average reading level of the population and to assess whether recommendations for health literacy are currently being met. METHODS:A cross-sectional study design was used. Patient-oriented English-language advance directive documents (brochures and/or forms) were obtained from the health agency websites of all Canadian provinces and territories and analyzed for readability using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Readability Ease scales. RESULTS:Advance directives in Canada are distinct from one another and surpass the recommended reading level by 4.5 ± 1.4 grade levels on average (95% confidence interval 8.7-10.3) with the hardest-to-read documents existing in Ontario, Quebec and Alberta. INTERPRETATION:These results demonstrate that the provincial and territorial governments issuing advance directive documentation have fallen short of their fiduciary responsibility to provide documents that facilitate health literacy. Addressing this shortcoming can result in increased patient engagement in advance directive completion while promoting patient autonomy.

SUBMITTER: Richard A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6182111 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul-Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Readability of advance directive documentation in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

Richard Alby A Richard Joël J Johnston Wendy W Miyasaki Janis J

CMAJ open 20180701 3

<h4>Background</h4>In the Canadian context, health literacy has been shown to depend on place of birth, education level, socioeconomic status, language spoken and geographic location. This study seeks to determine whether currently available advance directive documentation in Canada is written in accordance with the average reading level of the population and to assess whether recommendations for health literacy are currently being met.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional study design was used. Pat ...[more]

PMID: 30266778

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Documentation rates of patients' medical wishes are often low. It is unknown whether easy-to-use, patient-facing advance care planning (ACP) interventions can overcome barriers to planning in busy primary care settings. Objective:To compare the efficacy of an interactive, patient-centered ACP website (PREPARE) with an easy-to-read advance directive (AD) to increase planning documentation. Design, Setting, and Participants:This was a comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial from April 2013 to July 2016 conducted at multiple primary care clinics at the San Francisco VA Medical Center. Inclusion criteria were age of a least 60 years; at least 2 chronic and/or serious conditions; and 2 or more primary care visits; and 2 or more additional clinic, hospital, or emergency room visits in the last year. Interventions:Participants were randomized to review PREPARE plus an easy-to-read AD or the AD alone. There were no clinician and/or system-level interventions or education. Research staff were blinded for all follow-up measurements. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary outcome was new ACP documentation (ie, legal forms and/or discussions) at 9 months. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported ACP engagement at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months using validated surveys of behavior change process measures (ie, 5-point knowledge, self-efficacy, readiness scales) and action measures (eg, surrogate designation, using a 0-25 scale). We used intention-to-treat, mixed-effects logistic and linear regression, controlling for time, health literacy, race/ethnicity, baseline ACP, and clustering by physician. Results:The mean (SD) age of 414 participants was 71 (8) years, 38 (9%) were women, 83 (20%) had limited literacy, and 179 (43%) were nonwhite. No participant characteristic differed significantly among study arms at baseline. Retention at 6 months was 90%. Advance care planning documentation 6 months after enrollment was higher in the PREPARE arm vs the AD-alone arm (adjusted 35% vs 25%; odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.03-2.51]; P?=?.04). PREPARE also resulted in higher self-reported ACP engagement at each follow-up, including higher process and action scores; P <.001 at each follow-up). Conclusions and Relevance:Easy-to-use, patient-facing ACP tools, without clinician- and/or system-level interventions, can increase planning documentation 25% to 35%. Combining the PREPARE website with an easy-to-read AD resulted in higher planning documentation than the AD alone, suggesting that PREPARE may increase planning documentation with minimal health care system resources. Trial Registration:clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01550731.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Advance care planning (ACP), an ongoing communication and planning process, aims to clarify a person's values and preferences, so these guide decision-making if the person becomes unable to make his or her own decisions. Ideally, ACP results in completion of advance care directives (ACD), documents completed by competent people outlining their values, treatment preferences and/or appointment of a substitute decision-maker (SDM). ACDs are most effective at the point of care, where they can be used to inform treatment decisions. Australian governments fund initiatives and have developed policy to increase ACD completion rates. However, little is known about the prevalence of ACDs at the point of care in Australian health services, making ACP evaluation efforts difficult. This study aims to determine the prevalence of ACDs in records of older people in Australian hospitals, aged care facilities and general practices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:This is a national multicentre cross-sectional prevalence study in selected aged care facilities, hospitals and general practices. Following a 2017 feasibility study, a new protocol incorporating key learnings was developed. Sites will be recruited via expression of interest process. Health records of people aged ≥65 years, admitted to or attending services on study day(s) will be audited by trained staff from sites. Site-level data will be collected during the expression of interest. The primary outcome is the presence of at least one ACD in the health record. Secondary outcomes include prevalence of other documented outcomes of ACP (by health practitioner(s)/family/SDM), assessment of ACD quality and content and concordance between the person's documented preferences and any medical treatment orders. Individuals and sites characteristics where ACDs are present will be explored. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:Protocol approval by Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee, Melbourne, Australia (reference: HREC/18/Austin/109). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Participating sites and jurisdictions will receive individualised reports of findings.

Dataset Information

Readability of advance directive documentation in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

Publications

Readability of advance directive documentation in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets