Dataset Information

Differential Substrate Recognition by Maltose Binding Proteins Influenced by Structure and Dynamics.

ABSTRACT: The genome of the hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima contains three isoforms of maltose binding protein (MBP) that are high-affinity receptors for di-, tri-, and tetrasaccharides. Two of these proteins (tmMBP1 and tmMBP2) share significant sequence identity, approximately 90%, while the third (tmMBP3) shares less than 40% identity. MBP from Escherichia coli (ecMBP) shares 35% sequence identity with the tmMBPs. This subset of MBP isoforms offers an interesting opportunity to investigate the mechanisms underlying the evolution of substrate specificity and affinity profiles in a genome where redundant MBP genes are present. In this study, the X-ray crystal structures of tmMBP1, tmMBP2, and tmMBP3 are reported in the absence and presence of oligosaccharides. tmMBP1 and tmMBP2 have binding pockets that are larger than that of tmMBP3, enabling them to bind to larger substrates, while tmMBP1 and tmMBP2 also undergo substrate-induced hinge bending motions (?52°) that are larger than that of tmMBP3 (?35°). Small-angle X-ray scattering was used to compare protein behavior in solution, and computer simulations provided insights into dynamics of these proteins. Comparing quantitative protein-substrate interactions and dynamical properties of tmMBPs with those of the promiscuous ecMBP and disaccharide selective Thermococcus litoralis MBP provides insights into the features that enable selective binding. Collectively, the results provide insights into how the structure and dynamics of tmMBP homologues enable them to differentiate between a myriad of chemical entities while maintaining their common fold.

SUBMITTER: Shukla S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6189639 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differential Substrate Recognition by Maltose Binding Proteins Influenced by Structure and Dynamics.

Shukla Shantanu S Bafna Khushboo K Gullett Caeley C Myles Dean A A DAA Agarwal Pratul K PK Cuneo Matthew J MJ

Biochemistry 20180925 40

The genome of the hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima contains three isoforms of maltose binding protein (MBP) that are high-affinity receptors for di-, tri-, and tetrasaccharides. Two of these proteins (tmMBP1 and tmMBP2) share significant sequence identity, approximately 90%, while the third (tmMBP3) shares less than 40% identity. MBP from Escherichia coli (ecMBP) shares 35% sequence identity with the tmMBPs. This subset of MBP isoforms offers an interesting opportunity to investigate the mec ...[more]

PMID: 30204415

Similar Datasets

Project description:Two mechanisms, induced fit (IF) and conformational selection (CS), have been proposed to explain ligand recognition coupled conformational changes. The histidine binding protein (HisJ) adopts the CS mechanism, in which a pre-equilibrium is established between the open and the closed states with the ligand binding to the closed state. Despite being structurally similar to HisJ, the maltose binding protein (MBP) adopts the IF mechanism, in which the ligand binds the open state and induces a transition to the closed state. To understand the molecular determinants of this difference, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of coarse-grained dual structure based models. We find that intra-protein contacts unique to the closed state are sufficient to promote the conformational transition in HisJ, indicating a CS-like mechanism. In contrast, additional ligand-mimicking contacts are required to "induce" the conformational transition in MBP suggesting an IF-like mechanism. In agreement with experiments, destabilizing modifications to two structural features, the spine helix (SH) and the balancing interface (BI), present in MBP but absent in HisJ, reduce the need for ligand-mimicking contacts indicating that SH and BI act as structural restraints that keep MBP in the open state. We introduce an SH like element into HisJ and observe that this can impede the conformational transition increasing the importance of ligand-mimicking contacts. Similarly, simultaneous mutations to BI and SH in MBP reduce the barrier to conformational transitions significantly and promote a CS-like mechanism. Together, our results show that structural restraints present in the protein structure can determine the mechanism of conformational transitions and even simple models that correctly capture such structural features can predict their positions. MD simulations of such models can thus be used, in conjunction with mutational experiments, to regulate protein ligand interactions, and modulate ligand binding affinities.

Project description:The small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) are a virtually ubiquitous and diverse group of molecular chaperones that can bind and protect unfolding proteins from irreversible aggregation. It has been suggested that intrinsic disorder of the N-terminal arm (NTA) of sHSPs is important for substrate recognition. To investigate conformations of the NTA that could recognize substrates we performed replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations. Behavior at normal and stress temperatures of the dimeric building blocks of dodecameric HSPs from wheat (Ta16.9) and pea (Ps18.1) were compared because they display high sequence similarity, but Ps18.1 is more efficient in binding specific substrates. In our simulations, the NTAs of the dimer are flexible and dynamic; however, rather than exhibiting highly extended conformations they retain considerable α-helical character and contacts with the conserved α-crystallin domain (ACD). Network analysis and clustering methods reveal that there are two major conformational forms designated either "open" or "closed" based on the relative position of the two NTAs and their hydrophobic solvent accessible surface area. The equilibrium constant for the closed to open transition is significantly different for Ta16.9 and Ps18.1, with the latter showing more open conformations at elevated temperature correlated with its more effective chaperone activity. In addition, the Ps18.1 NTAs have more hydrophobic solvent accessible surface than those of Ta16.9. NTA hydrophobic patches are comparable in size to the area buried in many protein-protein interactions, which would enable sHSPs to bind early unfolding intermediates. Reduced interactions of the Ps18.1 NTAs with each other and with the ACD contribute to the differences in dynamics and hydrophobic surface area of the two sHSPs. These data support a major role for the conformational equilibrium of the NTA in substrate binding and indicate features of the NTA that contribute to sHSP chaperone efficiency.

Dataset Information

Differential Substrate Recognition by Maltose Binding Proteins Influenced by Structure and Dynamics.

Publications

Differential Substrate Recognition by Maltose Binding Proteins Influenced by Structure and Dynamics.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets