Dataset Information

Role of Patient- and Surgery-Specific Risk in Receipt of Outpatient Preoperative Testing.

ABSTRACT: Objective:To determine the independent association of patient- and surgery-specific risk with receipt of outpatient preoperative testing. Methods:Using administrative data from 2010-2013 (Marketscan® Commercial Claims and Encounters), we constructed a retrospective cohort of 678,368 privately-insured, non-elderly US adults who underwent one of ten operations, including one lower-risk and one higher-risk operation from five surgical specialties. Outcomes were receipt of nine outpatient tests in the 30 days before surgery and cost of those tests. Patient-specific risk was based on Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and, alternatively, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Surgery-specific risk was based on operation (higher- versus lower-risk within each specialty). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to measure the independent association of patient- and surgery-specific risk with the receipt of tests. Results:Receipt of tests ranged from 0.9% (pulmonary function tests) to 46.8% (blood counts), and 65.2% of patients received at least one test. Mean cost per patient for all tests was $124.38. Higher RCRI was strongly associated (Odds Ratio (OR) >2) with receipt of stress tests and echocardiograms, and more modestly associated [OR <2] with receipt of most other tests. Undergoing higher-risk operations was strongly associated with receipt of most tests. Results were similar using the CCI for patient-specific risk. Conclusion:Surgery-specific risk is strongly associated with receipt of most preoperative tests, which is consistent with preoperative testing protocols based as much or more on the planned operation as on patient-specific risk factors. Whether this pattern of preoperative testing represents optimal care is uncertain.

SUBMITTER: Riggs KR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6192049 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Role of Patient- and Surgery-Specific Risk in Receipt of Outpatient Preoperative Testing.

Riggs Kevin R KR Bass Eric B EB Segal Jodi B JB

Perioperative care and operating room management 20180306

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the independent association of patient- and surgery-specific risk with receipt of outpatient preoperative testing.<h4>Methods</h4>Using administrative data from 2010-2013 (Marketscan<sup>®</sup> Commercial Claims and Encounters), we constructed a retrospective cohort of 678,368 privately-insured, non-elderly US adults who underwent one of ten operations, including one lower-risk and one higher-risk operation from five surgical specialties. Outcomes were receipt of ...[more]

PMID: 30345397

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Due to increased needs to reduce non-fatal as well as fatal cardiac events, preoperative echocardiography remains part of routine clinical practice in many hospitals. Data on the role of preoperative echocardiography in low-risk non-cardiac surgery (NCS) other than ambulatory surgeries do not exist. We aimed to investigate the role of preoperative echocardiography in predicting postoperative adverse cardiovascular events (CVEs) in asymptomatic patients undergoing low-risk NCS. Methods The study population was derived from a retrospective cohort of 1,264 patients who underwent elective low-risk surgery at three tertiary hospitals from June 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021. Breast, distal bone, thyroid, and transurethral surgeries were included. Preoperative examination data including electrocardiography, chest radiography, and echocardiography were collected. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative adverse CVEs including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, newly diagnosed or acutely decompensated heart failure (HF), lethal arrhythmia such as sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, and new-onset atrial fibrillation within 30 days after the index surgery. Results Preoperative echocardiography was performed in 503 patients (39.8%), most frequently in patients with breast surgery (73.5%), followed by transurethral (37.7%), distal bone (21.6%), and thyroid surgeries (11.9%). Abnormal findings were observed in 5.0% of patients with preoperative echocardiography. Postoperative adverse CVEs occurred in 10 (0.79%) patients. Although a history of previous HF was an independent predictor of postoperative CVE occurrence (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 17.98; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.21–266.71, P = 0.036), preoperative echocardiography did not significantly predict CVE in multivariate analysis (P = 0.097). However, in patients who underwent preoperative echocardiography, the presence of abnormal echocardiographic findings was independently associated with development of CVE after NCS (aOR: 23.93; 95% CI: 1.2.28–250.76, P = 0.008). In particular, the presence of wall motion abnormality was a strong predictor of postoperative adverse CVE. Conclusion In real-world clinical practice, preoperative echocardiography was performed in substantial number of patients with potential cardiac risk even in low-risk NCS, and abnormal findings were independently associated with postoperative CVE. Future studies should identify patients undergoing low-risk NCS for whom preoperative echocardiography would be helpful to predict adverse CVE.

Project description:PurposeDelaying cataract surgery is associated with an increased risk of falls, but whether routine preoperative testing delays cataract surgery long enough to cause clinical harm is unknown. We sought to determine whether the use of routine preoperative testing leads to harm in the form of delayed surgery and falls in Medicare beneficiaries awaiting cataract surgery.DesignRetrospective, observational cohort study using 2006-2014 Medicare claims.ParticipantsMedicare beneficiaries 66+ years of age with a Current Procedural Terminology claim for ocular biometry.MethodsWe measured the mean and median number of days between biometry and cataract surgery, calculated the proportion of patients waiting ≥ 30 days or ≥ 90 days for surgery, and determined the odds of sustaining a fall within 90 days of biometry among patients of high-testing physicians (testing performed in ≥ 75% of their patients) compared with patients of low-testing physicians. We also estimated the number of days of delay attributable to high-testing physicians.Main outcome measuresIncidence of falls occurring between biometry and surgery, odds of falling within 90 days of biometry, and estimated delay associated with physician testing behavior.ResultsOf 248 345 beneficiaries, 16.4% were patients of high-testing physicians. More patients of high-testing physicians waited ≥ 30 days and ≥ 90 days to undergo surgery (31.4% and 8.2% vs. 25.0% and 5.5%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both). Falls before surgery in patients of high-testing physicians increased by 43% within the 90 days after ocular biometry (1.0% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.0001). The adjusted odds ratio of falling within 90 days of biometry in patients of high-testing physicians versus low-testing physicians was 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.19; P = 0.008). After adjusting for surgical wait time, the odds ratio decreased to 1.07 (95% CI, 1.00-1.15; P = 0.06). The delay associated with having a high-testing physician was approximately 8 days (estimate, 7.97 days; 95% CI, 6.40-9.55 days; P < 0.0001). Other factors associated with delayed surgery included patient race (non-White), Northeast region, ophthalmologist ≤ 40 years of age, and low surgical volume.ConclusionsOveruse of routine preoperative medical testing by high-testing physicians is associated with delayed surgery and increased falls in cataract patients awaiting surgery.

Project description:BackgroundDaily smokers and hazardous drinkers are high-risk patients, developing 2-4 times more complications after surgery. Preoperative smoking and alcohol cessation for four to eight weeks prior to surgery halves this complication rate. The patients' preoperative contact with the surgical departments might be too brief for the hospital to initiate these programmes. Therefore, it was relevant to evaluate a new clinical practice which combined the general practitioner's (GP) referral to surgery with a referral to a smoking and alcohol intervention in the surgical pathway.MethodsThe design was an exploratory prospective trial. The outcome measured was the number of patients referred to a preoperative smoking and alcohol cessation programme at the same time as being referred for elective surgery by their GP. The participants consisted of 72 high-risk patients who were referred for elective surgery by 47 local participating GPs. The GPs, nurses, and specialists in internal medicine, prehabilitation and surgery developed new clinical practice guidelines based on the literature and interviews with 11 local GPs about the specific barriers for implementing a smoking and alcohol cessation programme. The role of the GP was to be the gatekeeper: identifying daily smokers and hazardous drinkers when referring them to surgery; handing out information on risk reduction; and referring those patients identified to a preoperative smoking and alcohol cessation programme. The role of the hospital was to contact these patients to initiate smoking and alcohol cessation at the hospital out-patient clinic for life-style intervention.ResultsThe GPs increased their referral to the smoking and alcohol cessation programme from 0% to 10% (7/72 patients) in the study period.ConclusionThe effect of the study was limited in integrating the efforts of primary care providers and hospital surgical departments in increasing the up-take of preoperative smoking and alcohol cessation programmes aimed at smokers and harmful drinkers referred for surgery. New strategies for cooperation between GPs and surgical departments are urgently needed.Trial registrationJ.nr. 2005-54-1781 in Danish Data Protection Agency. J.nr. 07 268136 in Scientific Ethical Committee for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg Municipalities.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Choosing Wisely Top-5 list of activities to avoid includes "Don't obtain baseline laboratory studies in patients without significant systemic disease (ASA I or II) undergoing low-risk surgery - specifically complete blood count, basic or comprehensive metabolic panel, coagulation studies when blood loss (or fluid shifts) is/are expected to be minimal." Accordingly, we define low-value preoperative tests (LVTs) as those performed before minor surgery in patients without significant systemic disease. The objective of the current study was to examine the extent, variability, drivers, and costs of LVTs before carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgeries in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS:Using fiscal year (FY) 2015-2017 data derived from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), we determined the overall national and facility-level rates and associated costs of receiving any of 8 common LVTs in the 30 days before CTR in ASA physical status (PS) I-II patients. We also examined the patient, procedure, and facility factors associated with receiving ?1 LVT with mixed-effects logistic regression and the number of tests received with mixed-effects negative binomial regression. RESULTS:From FY15-17, 10,000 ASA class I-II patients received a CTR by 699 surgeons in 125 VHA facilities. Overall, 47.0% of patients had a CTR that was preceded by ?1 LVT, with substantial variability between facilities (range = 0%-100%; interquartile range = 36.3%), representing $339,717 in costs. Older age and female sex were associated with higher odds of receiving ?1 LVT. Local versus other modes of anesthesia were associated with lower odds of receiving ?1 LVT. Several facilities experienced large (>25%) increases or decreases from FY15 to FY17 in the proportion of patients receiving ?1 LVT. CONCLUSIONS:Counter to guidance from the ASA, we found that almost half of CTRs performed on ASA class I-II VHA patients were preceded by ?1 LVT. Although the total cost of these tests is relatively modest, CTR is just one of many low-risk procedures (eg, trigger finger release, cataract surgery) that may involve similar preoperative testing practices. These results will inform site selection for qualitative investigation of the drivers of low-value testing and the development of interventions to improve preoperative testing practice, especially in locations where rates of LVT are high.

Project description:IntroductionAbdominal computed tomography (CT) can accurately demonstrate organs and vascular structures around the stomach, and its potential role for image guidance is becoming increasingly established. However, solely using two-dimensional CT images to identify critical anatomical structures is undeniably challenging and not surgeon-friendly. To validate the feasibility of a patient-specific 3-D surgical navigation system for preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance during robotic gastric cancer surgery.Materials and methodsA prospective single-arm open-label observational study was conducted. Thirty participants underwent robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using a virtual surgical navigation system that provides patient-specific 3-D anatomical information with a pneumoperitoneum model using preoperative CT-angiography. Turnaround time and the accuracy of detecting vascular anatomy with its variations were measured, and perioperative outcomes were compared with a control group after propensity-score matching during the same study period.ResultsAmong 36 registered patients, 6 were excluded from the study. Patient-specific 3-D anatomy reconstruction was successfully implemented without any problems in all 30 patients using preoperative CT. All vessels encountered during gastric cancer surgery were successfully reconstructed, and all vascular origins and variations were identical to operative findings. The operative data and short-term outcomes between the experimental and control group were comparable. The experimental group showed shorter anesthesia time (218.6 min vs. 230.3 min; P=0.299), operative time (177.1 min vs. 193.9 min; P=0.137), and console time (129.3 min vs. 147.4 min; P=0.101) than the control group, although the differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionsPatient-specific 3-D surgical navigation system for robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer is clinically feasible and applicable with an acceptable turnaround time. This system enables patient-specific preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation by visualizing all the anatomy required for gastrectomy in 3-D models without any error.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05039333.

Dataset Information

Role of Patient- and Surgery-Specific Risk in Receipt of Outpatient Preoperative Testing.

Publications

Role of Patient- and Surgery-Specific Risk in Receipt of Outpatient Preoperative Testing.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets