Dataset Information

BALL DIVERGENCE: NONPARAMETRIC TWO SAMPLE TEST.

ABSTRACT: In this paper, we first introduce Ball Divergence, a novel measure of the difference between two probability measures in separable Banach spaces, and show that the Ball Divergence of two probability measures is zero if and only if these two probability measures are identical without any moment assumption. Using Ball Divergence, we present a metric rank test procedure to detect the equality of distribution measures underlying independent samples. It is therefore robust to outliers or heavy-tail data. We show that this multivariate two sample test statistic is consistent with the Ball Divergence, and it converges to a mixture of ?2 distributions under the null hypothesis and a normal distribution under the alternative hypothesis. Importantly, we prove its consistency against a general alternative hypothesis. Moreover, this result does not depend on the ratio of the two imbalanced sample sizes, ensuring that can be applied to imbalanced data. Numerical studies confirm that our test is superior to several existing tests in terms of Type I error and power. We conclude our paper with two applications of our method: one is for virtual screening in drug development process and the other is for genome wide expression analysis in hormone replacement therapy.

SUBMITTER: Pan W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6192286 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

BALL DIVERGENCE: NONPARAMETRIC TWO SAMPLE TEST.

Pan Wenliang W Tian Yuan Y Wang Xueqin X Zhang Heping H

Annals of statistics 20180601 3

In this paper, we first introduce Ball Divergence, a novel measure of the difference between two probability measures in separable Banach spaces, and show that the Ball Divergence of two probability measures is zero if and only if these two probability measures are identical without any moment assumption. Using Ball Divergence, we present a metric rank test procedure to detect the equality of distribution measures underlying independent samples. It is therefore robust to outliers or heavy-tail d ...[more]

PMID: 30344356

Similar Datasets

Project description:When the distributional assumptions for a t-test are not met, the default position of many analysts is to resort to a rank-based test, such as the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test to compare the difference in means between two samples. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test presents no danger of tied observations when the observations in the data are continuous. However, in practice, observations are discretized due various logical reasons, or the data are ordinal in nature. When ranks are tied, most textbooks recommend using mid-ranks to replace the tied ranks, a practice that affects the distribution of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test under the null hypothesis. Other methods for breaking ties have also been proposed. In this study, we examine four tie-breaking methods-average-scores, mid-ranks, jittering, and omission-for their effects on Type I and Type II error of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test and the two-sample t-test for various combinations of sample sizes, underlying population distributions, and percentages of tied observations. We use the results to determine the maximum percentage of ties for which the power and size are seriously affected, and for which method of tie-breaking results in the best Type I and Type II error properties. Not surprisingly, the underlying population distribution of the data has less of an effect on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test than on the t-test. Surprisingly, we find that the jittering and omission methods tend to hold Type I error at the nominal level, even for small sample sizes, with no substantial sacrifice in terms of Type II error. Furthermore, the t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test are equally effected by ties in terms of Type I and Type II error; therefore, we recommend omitting tied observations when they occur for both the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney due to the bias in Type I error that is created when tied observations are left in the data, in the case of the t-test, or adjusted using mid-ranks or average-scores, in the case of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney.

Dataset Information

BALL DIVERGENCE: NONPARAMETRIC TWO SAMPLE TEST.

Publications

BALL DIVERGENCE: NONPARAMETRIC TWO SAMPLE TEST.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets