Fluorescent labeling of endogenous platelets for intravital microscopy: Effects on platelet function.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Monitoring endogenous platelets during intravital microscopy often involves two approaches: fluorescently labeled antibodies or genetic models of platelet-specific fluorescent protein expression. Due to limited data available on platelet functional changes induced by these methods, we compared functional effects of these methods on platelets. METHODS:Platelet aggregation to collagen and thrombin, and collagen matrix-mediated platelet adhesion/aggregation under flow were tested. We assessed platelets from mice expressing EYFP on platelets (Cre(+)), littermate controls (Cre(-)), C57BL/6 mice, and platelets from vehicle control and x-488 treatment. We utilized intravital microscopy to monitor platelets in vivo using Cre(+) mice and x-488 treatment. RESULTS:Both genetic and antibody-based approaches yielded substantial platelet-specific fluorescence. Platelets from Cre(+) and Cre(-) mice behaved similarly in aggregation and adhesion/aggregation under flow. However, they exhibited significantly enhanced aggregation and higher adhesion/aggregation as compared to platelets from C57BL/6 mice. Compared to vehicle control, x-488 platelet labeling did not induce significant functional changes in vitro. Both methods of platelet labeling provided satisfactory platelet detectability in vivo. CONCLUSIONS:x-488 antibody labeling of platelets induced less alteration of platelet function than genetic approaches under our experimental conditions and seems more suitable for monitoring of endogenous platelets.
SUBMITTER: Da Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6204114 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA