Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Trends in the prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) based on cognitive assessment instruments are often inconsistent with those of neurocognitive disorders (ND) based on Medicare claims records.Objective
We hypothesized that improved ascertainment and resulting decrease in disease severity at the time of diagnosis are responsible for this phenomenon.Methods
Using Medicare data linked to the Health and Retirement Study (1992-2012), we performed a joint analysis of trends in CI and ND to test our hypothesis.Results
We identified two major contributors to the divergent directions in CI and ND trends: reductions in disease severity explained more than 60% of the differences between CI and ND prevalence over the study period; the remaining 40% was explained by a decrease in the fraction of undiagnosed individuals.Discussion
Improvements in the diagnoses of ND diseases were a major contributor to reported trends in ND and CI. Recent forecasts of CI and ND trends in the U.S. may be overly pessimistic.
SUBMITTER: Akushevich I
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6214183 | biostudies-literature | 2018
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Akushevich Igor I Yashkin Arseniy P AP Kravchenko Julia J Ukraintseva Svetlana S Stallard Eric E Yashin Anatoliy I AI
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD 20180101 1
<h4>Background</h4>Trends in the prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) based on cognitive assessment instruments are often inconsistent with those of neurocognitive disorders (ND) based on Medicare claims records.<h4>Objective</h4>We hypothesized that improved ascertainment and resulting decrease in disease severity at the time of diagnosis are responsible for this phenomenon.<h4>Methods</h4>Using Medicare data linked to the Health and Retirement Study (1992-2012), we performed a joint analysi ...[more]