Dataset Information

Exploring the sensitivity of magnetic resonance fingerprinting to motion.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:To explore the motion sensitivity of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), we performed experiments with different types of motion at various time intervals during multiple scans. Additionally, we investigated the possibility to correct the motion artifacts based on redundancy in MRF data. METHODS:A radial version of the FISP-MRF sequence was used to acquire one transverse slice through the brain. Three subjects were instructed to move in different patterns (in-plane rotation, through-plane wiggle, complex movements, adjust head position, and pretend itch) during different time intervals. The potential to correct motion artifacts in MRF by removing motion-corrupted data points from the fingerprints and dictionary was evaluated. RESULTS:Morphological structures were well preserved in multi-parametric maps despite subject motion. Although the bulk T1 values were not significantly affected by motion, fine structures were blurred when in-plane motion was present during the first part of the scan. On the other hand, T2 values showed a considerable deviation from the motion-free results, especially when through-plane motion was present in the middle of the scan (-44% on average). Explicitly removing the motion-corrupted data from the scan partially restored the T2 values (-10% on average). CONCLUSION:Our experimental results showed that different kinds of motion have distinct effects on the precision and effective resolution of the parametric maps measured with MRF. Although MRF-based acquisitions can be relatively robust to motion effects occurring at the beginning or end of the sequence, relying on redundancy in the data alone is not sufficient to assure the accuracy of the multi-parametric maps in all cases.

SUBMITTER: Yu Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6215476 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exploring the sensitivity of magnetic resonance fingerprinting to motion.

Yu Zidan Z Zhao Tiejun T Assländer Jakob J Lattanzi Riccardo R Sodickson Daniel K DK Cloos Martijn A MA

Magnetic resonance imaging 20180905

<h4>Purpose</h4>To explore the motion sensitivity of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), we performed experiments with different types of motion at various time intervals during multiple scans. Additionally, we investigated the possibility to correct the motion artifacts based on redundancy in MRF data.<h4>Methods</h4>A radial version of the FISP-MRF sequence was used to acquire one transverse slice through the brain. Three subjects were instructed to move in different patterns (in-plane ro ...[more]

PMID: 30193953

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has been recently introduced to simultaneously provide T1 , T2 , and M0 maps. Here, we develop a 3-point Dixon-cMRF approach to enable simultaneous water specific T1 , T2 , and M0 mapping of the heart and fat fraction (FF) estimation in a single breath-hold scan. METHODS:Dixon-cMRF is achieved by combining cMRF with several innovations that were previously introduced for other applications, including a 3-echo GRE acquisition with golden angle radial readout and a high-dimensional low-rank tensor constrained reconstruction to recover the highly undersampled time series images for each echo. Water-fat separation of the Dixon-cMRF time series is performed to allow for water- and fat-specific T1 , T2 , and M0 estimation, whereas FF estimation is extracted from the M0 maps. Dixon-cMRF was evaluated in a standardized T1 -T2 phantom, in a water-fat phantom, and in healthy subjects in comparison to current clinical standards: MOLLI, SASHA, T2 -GRASE, and 6-point Dixon proton density FF (PDFF) mapping. RESULTS:Dixon-cMRF water T1 and T2 maps showed good agreement with reference T1 and T2 mapping techniques (R2 > 0.99 and maximum normalized RMSE ~5%) in a standardized phantom. Good agreement was also observed between Dixon-cMRF FF and reference PDFF (R2 > 0.99) and between Dixon-cMRF water T1 and T2 and water selective T1 and T2 maps (R2 > 0.99) in a water-fat phantom. In vivo Dixon-cMRF water T1 values were in good agreement with MOLLI and water T2 values were slightly underestimated when compared to T2 -GRASE. Average myocardium septal T1 values were 1129 ± 38 ms, 1026 ± 28 ms, and 1045 ± 32 ms for SASHA, MOLLI, and the proposed water Dixon-cMRF. Average T2 values were 51.7 ± 2.2 ms and 42.8 ± 2.6 ms for T2 -GRASE and water Dixon-cMRF, respectively. Dixon-cMRF FF maps showed good agreement with in vivo PDFF measurements (R2 > 0.98) and average FF in the septum was measured at 1.3%. CONCLUSION:The proposed Dixon-cMRF allows to simultaneously quantify myocardial water T1 , water T2 , and FF in a single breath-hold scan, enabling multi-parametric T1 , T2 , and fat characterization. Moreover, reduced T1 and T2 quantification bias caused by water-fat partial volume was demonstrated in phantom experiments.

Dataset Information

Exploring the sensitivity of magnetic resonance fingerprinting to motion.

Publications

Exploring the sensitivity of magnetic resonance fingerprinting to motion.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets