Dataset Information

Sexual function and combined oral contraceptives - a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:The effect of combined oral contraceptives (COC) on female sexuality has long been a matter of discussion, but placebo-controlled studies are lacking. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate if an estradiol-containing COC influences sexual function. DESIGN:Investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial where 202 healthy women were randomized to a combined oral contraceptive (1.5 mg estradiol and 2.5 mg nomegestrol acetate) or placebo for three treatment cycles. METHODS:Sexual function at baseline and during the last week of the final treatment cycle was evaluated by the McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire. Serum and hair testosterone levels were assessed at the same time points. RESULTS:Compared to placebo, COC use was associated with a small decrease in sexual interest (COC median change score: -2.0; interquartile range (IQR): -5.0-0.5 vs. placebo: -1.0; IQR: -3.0-2.0, p = 0.019), which remained following adjustment for change in self-rated depressive symptoms B = -0.80 ± 0.30, Wald = 7.08, p = 0.008. However, the proportion of women who reported a clinically relevant deterioration in sexual interest did not differ between COC or placebo users (COC 18 (22.2%) vs. placebo 16 (17.8%), p = 0.47). Change in other measured aspects of sexual function as well as total score of sexual function did not differ between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS:This study suggests that use of estradiol-based combined oral contraceptives is associated with reduced sexual interest. However, the changes are minute, and probably not of clinical relevance.

SUBMITTER: Lundin C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6215801 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Sexual function and combined oral contraceptives - a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Lundin Cecilia C Malmborg Agota A Slezak Julia J Gemzell-Danielsson Kristina K Bixo Marie M Bengtsdotter Hanna H Marions Lena L Lindh Ingela I Theodorsson Elvar E Hammar Mats M Sundström-Poromaa Inger I

Endocrine connections 20180901

<h4>Objective</h4>The effect of combined oral contraceptives (COC) on female sexuality has long been a matter of discussion, but placebo-controlled studies are lacking. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate if an estradiol-containing COC influences sexual function.<h4>Design</h4>Investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial where 202 healthy women were randomized to a combined oral contraceptive (1.5 mg estradiol and 2.5 mg nomegestrol acet ...[more]

PMID: 30352399

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSexual dysfunction is common in women with vulvodynia.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate whether extended-release gabapentin is more effective than placebo in improving sexual function in women with provoked vulvodynia and whether there is a relationship between treatment outcome and pelvic pain muscle severity that is evaluated by palpation with standardized applied pressure and (2) to evaluate whether sexual function in women with provoked vulvodynia would approach that of control subjects who report no vulvar pain either before or after treatment.Study designAs a secondary outcome in a multicenter double-blind, randomized crossover trial, sexual function that was measured by the Female Sexual Function Index was evaluated with gabapentin (1200-3000 mg/d) compared with placebo. Pain-free control subjects, matched by age and race, also completed Female Sexual Function Index for comparison.ResultsFrom August 2012 to January 2016, 230 women were screened at 3 academic institutions, and 89 women were assigned randomly to treatment. Gabapentin was more effective than placebo in improving overall sexual function (adjusted mean difference, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-2.2; P=.008), which included desire (mean difference, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.0-3.3; P=.04), arousal (mean difference, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.5; P=.004), and satisfaction (mean difference, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.5; P=.02); however, sexual function remained significantly lower than in 56 matched vulvodynia pain-free control subjects. There was a moderate treatment effect among participants with baseline pelvic muscle pain severity scores above the median on the full Female Sexual Function Index scale (mean difference, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-2.8; P=.02) and arousal (mean difference, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.6; P=.01) and pain domains (mean difference, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.9; P=.04).ConclusionGabapentin improved sexual function in this group of women with provoked vulvodynia, although overall sexual function remained lower than women without the disorder. The most statistically significant increase was in the arousal domain of the Female Sexual Function Index that suggested a central mechanism of response. Women with median algometer pain scores >5 improved sexual function overall, but the improvement was more frequent than the pain domain. We hypothesize that gabapentin may be effective as a pharmacologic treatment for those women with provoked vulvodynia and increased pelvic muscle pain on examination.

Dataset Information

Sexual function and combined oral contraceptives - a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Publications

Sexual function and combined oral contraceptives - a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets