ACTR-65. INTRATHECAL PEMETREXED FOR PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT LEPTOMENINGEAL METASTASIS FROM LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA: A PHASE I CLINICAL TRIAL (IPRLM,NCT03101579)
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Abstract BACKGROUND To determine toxicities, maximally tolerated dose (MTD), and potential antitumor activity of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP). MATERIAL AND METHODS Pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients with recurrent or progressive leptomeningeal metastases (LM) after intrathecal chemotherapy and other LM-related therapy were included. IP doses escalated from 10 mg to 15 mg, and even 20 mg. Protocol schema of IP was twice per week for 2 weeks (induction therapy), followed by once per week for 2–4 weeks (consolidation therapy). The primary endpoints were MTD and safety. The secondary endpoint was efficacy. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected and analyzed for drug concentration. RESULTS Nine patients (male: 3; female: 6; age: 37–71 years; median: 55) were enrolled between March 2017 and March 2018. All cases received total 50 times of IP (2–8 times, median: 6). Incidence of >grade III adverse events was 50%, including 4 cases with hematological toxicities and 2 with radiculitis. One patient received 15 mg IP dose expired due to hematological toxicities. Then protocol was revised. The dose was decreased to 10 mg. B12 and folic acid supplementation was indispensable. Three more cases were enrolled subsequently. No case showed severe hematological toxicities. Total clinical response rate was 80%. For the cohort of 10 mg dose, clinical response rate was 88%. All cases were followed up until May 1, 2018. Six cases died from cancer or related complications. No acute or subacute CNS toxicity was observed. The median overall survival was 2.5 (0.3–12) months from enrollment of this study. Pemetrexed was not cumulative in CSF. Times of plasma concentration peak were 6 h in 3 cases, 9 h in 1 case, and 12 h in 1 case after IP. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed is suitable for intrathecal use. A dose of 10 mg shows well safety and high clinical response rate, which is worth for subsequent trials.
SUBMITTER: Pan Z
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6216481 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA