Dataset Information

NIMG-68. MRI CHANGES IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS TREATED AS PART OF A PHASE II TRIAL WITH BAVITUXIMAB, RADIATION, AND TEMOZOLOMIDE

ABSTRACT: Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma and tumor endothelial cells express phosphatidylserine, a highly immunosuppressive membrane phospholipid. Bavituximab a chimeric monoclonal antibody binds to 2-glycoprotein 1 (2-GP1) to form a complex of 2-GP1 with phosphatidylserine, resulting in immune activation against tumor cells and anti-angiogenic effects. Phase I/II trials in other solid cancers have demonstrated response rates up to 85% when bavituximab was given with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Pre-clinical data in glioblastoma models suggested synergistic effects of phosphatidylserine blockade, radiation, and temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS In this ongoing phase II trial (NCT03139916), adult patients with IDH-wild-type newly diagnosed glioblastoma receive 6 weeks of chemoradiation, followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (C1-C6 aTMZ). Bavituximab (3 mg/kg) is given weekly, starting week 1 of chemoradiation, for 18 weeks with the option to continue if tolerated. Physiologic MRIs are performed pre-treatment, pre-C1, pre-C3, and pre-C5 aTMZ. Within the enhancing tumor region, we measured median tumor Ktrans (reflecting vascular permeability) and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). Median percent changes during treatment were compared to pre-treatment values. RESULTS To date, 25 of 36 anticipated patients have enrolled (10 with MGMT promoter methylation). All patients underwent pre-treatment scans. 13 have evaluable pre-C1 and 8 pre-C3 aTMZ scans. On the pre-C1 MRIs, enhancing volume decreased by 39% and median tumor Ktrans and rCBV did not change significantly. On the pre-C3 MRIs, enhancing volume decreased by 11% and Ktrans and rCBV decreased by 17% and 21%, respectively. Five patients experienced radiographic disease progression after a median of 2.6 months and 1 patient died 76 days after diagnosis due to disease progression. Bavituximab was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Combining bavituximab with radiation and temozolomide results in decreased enhancing tumor volume, permeability, and cerebral perfusion. Continued patient accrual and imaging marker evaluation are underway to investigate the correlation between bavituximab, MRI changes, and survival.

SUBMITTER: Ly I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6216505 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe impact of prolonging temozolomide (TMZ) maintenance beyond six cycles in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) remains a topic of discussion. We investigated the effects of prolonged TMZ maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Patients and methodsIn this retrospective single-center cohort study, we included patients with GBM who were treated with radiation therapy with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ. For analysis, patients were considered who either completed six TMZ maintenance cycles (group B), continued with TMZ therapy beyond six cycles (group C), or stopped TMZ maintenance therapy within the first six cycles (group A). Patients with progression during the first six TMZ maintenance cycles were excluded.ResultsClinical data from 107 patients were included for Kaplan-Meier analyses and 102 for Cox regressions. Median PFS times were 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.1-12.4) in group A, 13.7 months (95% CI 10.6-17.5) in group B, and 20.9 months (95% CI 15.2-43.5) in group C. At first progression, response rates of TMZ/lomustine rechallenge were 47% in group B and 13% in group C. Median OS times were 12.7 months (95% CI 10.3-16.8) in group A, 25.2 months (95% CI 17.7-55.5) in group B, and 28.6 months (95% CI 24.4-open) in group C. Nevertheless, multivariate Cox regression for patients in group C compared with group B that accounted for imbalances of other risk factors showed no different relative risk (RR) for OS (RR 0.77, p = .46).ConclusionOur data do not support a general extension of TMZ maintenance therapy beyond six cycles. The Oncologist 2017;22:570-575 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Radiation therapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) maintenance therapy is still the standard of care in patients below the age of 65 years in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. However, in clinical practice, many centers continue TMZ maintenance therapy beyond six cycles. The impact of this continuation is controversial and has not yet been addressed in prospective randomized clinical trials. We compared the effect of more than six cycles of TMZ in comparison with exactly six cycles on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by multivariate analysis and found a benefit in PFS but not OS. Thus, our data do not suggest prolonging TMZ maintenance therapy beyond six cycles, which should be considered in neurooncological practice.

Project description:Abstract INTRODUCTION Standard of care for glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) with tumor treatment fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiotherapy work synergistically. We report our experience evaluating toxicity of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent TTFields. METHODS This is a single-arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Patients (age≥ 18 years) with KPS≥ 60 with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were eligible. Patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy/30 fx), standard TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard TMZ and TTFields continuation. Radiotherapy was delivered through TTFields arrays. Primary endpoint was safety and toxicity of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation. RESULTS We report the first eighteen patients on trial. Majority were male (66.7%) with median age 59 years (34 to 77). Median KPS was 90 (70–100). Median follow-up was 6.0 months (1.4 to 18.0). Twelve (66.6%) patients had unmethylated MGMT, five (27.8%) were methylated, and one patient’s status was not obtained. Scalp dose constraints were achieved, with mean dose having a median value of 7.4 Gy (4.3–13.2), D20cc median 23.2 Gy (17.7–36.8), and D30cc median 20.3 Gy (14.8–33.4). Only one possible Grade 3 toxicity was observed in a patient who experienced a seizure in month six of the maintenance phase. Skin toxicity (erythema or dermatitis) was limited to Grade 1 (83.3%) or 2 (5.6%) during the concurrent phase and resolved spontaneously or responded to topical medications. Other Grade 1 events included fatigue (47.3%), cognitive impairment (31.6%), pruritis (52.6%), headache (26.3%), dizziness (15.8%), and nausea (26.3%). Other Grade 2 events included fatigue (21.1%) and headache (10.5%). Nine patients (50%) had progression, with median PFS of 7.6 months (2.2–9.6 months). CONCLUSIONS Concurrent TTFields with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is a safe and feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trials are warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation.

Project description:PurposeThis open-label, prospective, multicenter single-arm phase II study combined bevacizumab (BV) with radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). The objectives were to determine the efficacy of this treatment combination and the associated toxicity.Patients and methodsSeventy patients with newly diagnosed GBM were enrolled between August 2006 and November 2008. Patients received standard RT starting within 3 to 6 weeks after surgery with concurrent administration of daily TMZ and biweekly BV. After completion of RT, patients resumed TMZ for 5 days every 4 weeks and continued biweekly BV. MGMT promoter methylation was assessed on patient tumor tissue. A University of California, Los Angeles/Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles (KPLA) control cohort of newly diagnosed patients treated with first-line RT and TMZ who had mostly received BV at recurrence was derived for comparison.ResultsThe overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 19.6 and 13.6 months, respectively, compared to 21.1 and 7.6 months in the University of California, Los Angeles/KPLA control cohort, and 14.6 and 6.9 months in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-National Cancer Institute of Canada cohort. Correlation of MGMT promoter methylation and improved OS and PFS was retained in the study group. Comparative subset analysis showed that poor prognosis patients (recursive partitioning analysis class V/VI) may derive an early benefit from the use of first-line BV. Toxicity attributable to RT/TMZ was similar, and additional toxicities were consistent with those reported in other BV trials.ConclusionPatients treated with BV and TMZ during and after RT showed improved PFS without improved OS compared to the University of California, Los Angeles/KPLA control group. Additional studies are warranted to determine if BV administered first-line improves survival compared to BV at recurrence.

Dataset Information

NIMG-68. MRI CHANGES IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS TREATED AS PART OF A PHASE II TRIAL WITH BAVITUXIMAB, RADIATION, AND TEMOZOLOMIDE

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets