Dataset Information

Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling.

ABSTRACT: Amplification and sequencing of 16S amplicons are widely used for profiling the structure of oral microbiota. However, it remains not clear whether and to what degree DNA extraction and targeted 16S rRNA hypervariable regions influence the analysis. Based on a mock community consisting of five oral bacterial species in equal abundance, we compared the 16S amplicon sequencing results on the Illumina MiSeq platform from six frequently employed DNA extraction procedures and three pairs of widely used 16S rRNA hypervariable primers targeting different 16S rRNA regions. Technical reproducibility of selected 16S regions was also assessed. DNA extraction method exerted considerable influence on the observed bacterial diversity while hypervariable regions had a relatively minor effect. Protocols with beads added to the enzyme-mediated DNA extraction reaction produced more accurate bacterial community structure than those without either beads or enzymes. Hypervariable regions targeting V3-V4 and V4-V5 seemed to produce more reproducible results than V1-V3. Neither sequencing batch nor change of operator affected the reproducibility of bacterial diversity profiles. Therefore, DNA extraction strategy and 16S rDNA hypervariable regions both influenced the results of oral microbiota biodiversity profiling, thus should be carefully considered in study design and data interpretation.

SUBMITTER: Teng F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6218491 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling.

Teng Fei F Darveekaran Nair Sree Sankar SS Zhu Pengfei P Li Shanshan S Huang Shi S Li Xiaolan X Xu Jian J Yang Fang F

Scientific reports 20181105 1

Amplification and sequencing of 16S amplicons are widely used for profiling the structure of oral microbiota. However, it remains not clear whether and to what degree DNA extraction and targeted 16S rRNA hypervariable regions influence the analysis. Based on a mock community consisting of five oral bacterial species in equal abundance, we compared the 16S amplicon sequencing results on the Illumina MiSeq platform from six frequently employed DNA extraction procedures and three pairs of widely us ...[more]

PMID: 30397210

Similar Datasets

Project description:Proper preservation of stool samples to minimize microbial community shifts and inactivate infectious agents is important for self-collected specimens requiring shipment to laboratories when cold chain transport is not feasible. In this study, we evaluated the performance of six preservation solutions (Norgen, OMNI, RNAlater, CURNA, HEMA, and Shield) for these aspects. Following storage of human stool samples with these preservatives at room temperature for 7 days, three hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V1-V2, V3-V4, and V4) were amplicon sequenced. We found that samples collected in two preservatives, Norgen and OMNI, showed the least shift in community composition relative to -80°C standards compared with other storage conditions, and both efficiently inhibited the growth of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. RNAlater did not prevent bacterial activity and exhibited relatively larger community shift. Although the effect of preservation solution was small compared to intersubject variation, notable changes in microbiota composition were observed, which could create biases in downstream data analysis. When community profiles inferred from different 16S rRNA gene hypervariable regions were compared, we found differential sensitivity of primer sets in identifying overall microbial community and certain bacterial taxa. For example, reads generated by the V4 primer pair showed a higher alpha diversity of the gut microbial community. The degenerate 27f-YM primer failed to detect the majority of Bifidobacteriales. Our data indicate that choice of preservation solution and 16S rRNA gene primer pair are critical determinants affecting gut microbiota profiling. IMPORTANCE Large-scale human microbiota studies require specimens collected from multiple sites and/or time points to maximize detection of the small effects in microbe-host interactions. However, batch biases caused by experimental protocols, such as sample collection, massively parallel sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses, remain critical and should be minimized. This work evaluated the effects of preservation solutions and bacterial 16S rRNA gene primer pairs in revealing human gut microbiota composition. Since notable changes in detecting bacterial composition and abundance were observed among choice of preservatives and primer pairs, a consistent methodology is essential in minimizing their effects to facilitate comparisons between data sets.

Project description:Variability in representation of microbial communities can be caused by differences in microbial composition or artifacts introduced at sample collection or processing. Alterations in community representation introduced by variations in starting DNA concentrations have not been systematically investigated in stool samples. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of the genomic DNA (gDNA) concentration in the resulting 16S rRNA gene library composition and compare its effect to other sample processing variables in homogenized human fecal material. Compared to a gDNA input of 1 ng/?l, inputs of ?1.6 × 10-3 ng/?l resulted in a marked decrease in the concentration of the 16S rRNA gene amplicon (P < 0.001). Low gDNA concentrations (?1.6 × 10-3 ng/?l) were also associated with a decrease (P < 0.001) in the number of operational taxonomic units and significant divergence in ?-diversity profiles (unweighted UniFrac distance, P < 0.001), as characterized by an overestimation of Proteobacteria and underestimation of Firmicutes. Even a gDNA concentration of 4 × 10-2 ng/?l showed a significant impact on the ?-diversity profile (unweighted UniFrac distance, P = 0.03). Overall, the gDNA concentration explained 22.4% to 38.1% of the microbiota variation based on various ?-diversity measures (P < 0.001). By comparison, the DNA extraction methods and PCR volumes tested did not significantly affect the microbial composition profile, and the PCR cycling method explained less than 3.7% of the microbiota variation (weighted UniFrac distance, P = 0.03). The 16S rRNA gene yield and the microbial community representation of human homogenized stool samples are significantly altered by gDNA template concentrations of ?1.6 × 10-3 ng/?l. In addition, data from studies with a gDNA input of ?4 × 10-2 ng/?l should be interpreted with caution. IMPORTANCE The genomic DNA input for stool samples utilized for microbiome composition has not been determined. In this study, we determined the reliable threshold level under which conclusions drawn from the data may be compromised. We also determined the type of microbial bias introduced by less-than-ideal genomic input.

Dataset Information

Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling.

Publications

Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets