Dataset Information

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Elbow Pathologies: a Descriptive Review of Current Literature.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW:Platelet-rich plasma is used in many orthopedic pathologies such as tendinopathies and ligament injuries. The clinical results reported in the scientific literature are, however, confusing. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a narrative literature review regarding the role of PRP in the most common elbow soft tissue pathologies. RECENT FINDINGS:The response to PRP seems to be favorable when compared to steroid injection for pain management and for patient-reported outcomes in lateral epicondylitis. PRP injection does not seem to have the potential complications associated with a steroid injection such as skin atrophy, discoloration, and secondary tendon tears. Only a few manuscripts comparing the results of PRP treatment with either extracorporeal shockwave (ESW), dry needling, or even surgical treatments in lateral epicondylitis exist. The use of PRP in other elbow pathologies such as golfer's elbow, ulnar collateral ligament injury, and distal biceps and triceps pathology is examined in few studies, with unclear recommendations. Regarding elbow pathologies, PRP injections in tennis elbow seems to be the best-studied intervention. A major limitation in these studies is the significant heterogeneity in the methods used for preparing PRP, for example employing leukocyte-rich, leukocyte-poor preparations, PRP with or without activation, which makes the results of the studies difficult to compare. Results of this review show that more studies on larger cohorts, with comparable formulations, and with longer follow-up are required to give optimal suggestions concerning the use of PRP in elbow pathologies.

SUBMITTER: Kwapisz A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6220004 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Elbow Pathologies: a Descriptive Review of Current Literature.

Kwapisz Adam A Prabhakar Sharad S Compagnoni Riccardo R Sibilska Aleksandra A Randelli Pietro P

Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine 20181201 4

<h4>Purpose of review</h4>Platelet-rich plasma is used in many orthopedic pathologies such as tendinopathies and ligament injuries. The clinical results reported in the scientific literature are, however, confusing. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a narrative literature review regarding the role of PRP in the most common elbow soft tissue pathologies.<h4>Recent findings</h4>The response to PRP seems to be favorable when compared to steroid injection for pain management and for patient-r ...[more]

PMID: 30255288

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study questionCan human umbilical cord platelet-rich plasma (hUC-PRP) efficiently treat endometrial damage and restore fertility in a preclinical murine model?Summary answerLocal application of hUC-PRP promotes tissue regeneration and fertility restoration in a murine model of Asherman syndrome and endometrial atrophy (AS/EA).What is known alreadyAS/EA are well-described endometrial pathologies that cause infertility; however, there are currently no gold-standard treatments available. Recent reports have described the successful use of human platelet-rich plasma in reproductive medicine, and its regenerative potential is further enhanced using hUC-PRP, due to the ample growth factors and reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines in the latter.Study design size durationhUC-PRP (n = 3) was processed, characterized and delivered locally to endometrial damage in a murine model (n = 50). The hUC-PRP was either used alone or loaded into a decellularized porcine endometrium-derived extracellular matrix (EndoECM) hydrogel; endometrial regeneration, fertility outcomes and immunocompatibility were evaluated 2 weeks following treatment administration.Participants/materials setting methodsUmbilical cord blood was obtained from women in childbirth. Endometrial damage (mimicking AS/EA) was induced using ethanol in 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice, and treated with the most concentrated hUC-PRP sample 4 days later. Characterization of hUC-PRP and immunotolerance was carried out with multiplex technology, while uterine samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and quantitative PCR. The number of embryos and their morphology was determined visually.Main results and the role of chancePlatelet density was enhanced 3-fold in hUC-PRP compared to that in hUC blood (P < 0.05). hUC-PRP was enriched with growth factors related to tissue regeneration (i.e. hepatocyte growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor-BB and epidermal growth factor), which were released constantly (in vitro) when hUC-PRP was loaded into EndoECM. Both treatments (hUC-PRP alone and hUC-PRP with EndoECM) were immunotolerated and caused significantly regeneration of the damaged endometrium, evidenced by increased endometrial area, neoangiogenesis, cell proliferation and gland density and lower collagen deposition with respect to non-treated uterine horns (P < 0.05). Additionally, we detected augmented gene expression of Akt1, VEGF and Ang, which are involved in regenerative and proliferation pathways. Finally, hUC-PRP treatment restored pregnancy rates in the mouse model.Large scale dataN/A.Limitations reasons for cautionThis proof-of-concept pilot study was based on a murine model of endometrial damage and the use of EndoECM requires further validation prior to clinical implementation for women affected by AS/EA.Wider implications of the findingsThe local administration of hUC-PRP has high impact and is immunotolerated in a murine model of AS/EA, as has been reported in other tissues, making it a promising candidate for heterologous treatment of these endometrial pathologies.Study funding/competing interestsThis study was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; Conselleria de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital, Generalitat Valenciana; and Instituto de Salud Carlos III. The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) compared to lidocaine as a tenotomy adjuvant for people with elbow tendinopathy.MethodsOur study was a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized trial involving 71 patients with recalcitrant elbow tendinopathy who received two sessions of ultrasound-guided tenotomy with either PRP or lidocaine in a tertiary public hospital. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with an improvement exceeding 25% reduction in disability (Spanish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires-DASH-E) at 6 and 12 months; the secondary outcome was the percentage of patients exceeding 25% reduction in pain (VAS-P).ResultsThere was no evidence of significant differences in the proportion of patients who experienced clinically relevant improvements. After 6 months, 18 patients (78.59%) in the lidocaine group and 19 patients (73.08%) in the PRP group showed improved function above 25% (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 (0.17 to 4.60)); 21 patients (72.21%) in the lidocaine group versus 22 patients (84.62%) in the PRP group achieved more than 25% pain reduction (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.10 to 2.37). After 12 months, 17 patients (70.83%) in the lidocaine group versus 19 patients (76%) in the PRP group had improved function (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.13 to 3.84), and 19 patients (76%) in the lidocaine group versus 20 patients (90.91%) in the PRP group had improved pain above 25% (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.06 to 2.51). Hypercholesterolemia and baseline vascularization influenced outcomes. There were no differences between groups in the adjusted odds ratios.ConclusionPRP results in similar improvements to those obtained with lidocaine. Selecting patients according to their pretreatment status can improve treatment efficacy.Trial registrationNCT01945528 , EudraCT 2013-000478-32. Registered 18 August 2013, enrolment of the first participant 10 March 2014.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Sinus augmentation can be performed with or without grafting biomaterials, and to date, there is no quality evidence regarding the augmentation of the sinus floor using only platelet concentrates, which can improve the healing period and enhance bone regeneration by stimulating angiogenesis and bone formation. The main objective of this paper was to assess the effect of the sole use of platelet concentrates in sinus augmentation in terms of newly formed bone, augmented bone height, and clinical outcomes and to assess the additional beneficial effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in combination with other grafting biomaterials. METHODS:A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled analyses were performed with the Review Manager software. RESULTS:For sinus elevation only using platelet concentrates, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for qualitative synthesis. Only one study was a clinical trial, which reported improved outcomes for the allograft group compared to the titanium-PRF (T-PRF) group. A total of 12 studies where PRF was used in addition to grafting biomaterials met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Results from meta-analyses provided no additional beneficial effects of PRF in sinus augmentation in terms of bone height and percentage of soft tissue area. There was a statistically significant lower percentage of residual bone substitute material in the PRF (+) group compared to the PRF (-) group. The percentage of newly formed bone was slightly higher in the PRF (+) group, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION:There is no robust evidence to make firm conclusions regarding the beneficial effects of the sole use of platelet concentrates in sinus augmentation. However, studies have shown favorable outcomes regarding implant survival, bone gain, and bone height. The use of PRF with other grafting biomaterials appears to provide no additional beneficial effects in sinus lift procedures, but they may improve the healing period and bone formation. Well-conducted randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are necessary to confirm the available results to provide recommendations for the clinical practice.

Dataset Information

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Elbow Pathologies: a Descriptive Review of Current Literature.

Publications

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Elbow Pathologies: a Descriptive Review of Current Literature.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets