Dataset Information

Secondary Oxalate Nephropathy: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Little is known of the clinical outcomes of secondary oxalate nephropathy. To inform clinical practice, we performed a systematic review of case reports and case series to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with secondary oxalate nephropathy.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for case reports and case series of individual cases or cohorts of patients with biopsy-proven oxalate nephropathy in native or transplanted kidneys from 1950 until January 2018.

Results

Fifty-seven case reports and 10 case series met the inclusion criteria, totaling 108 patients. The case series were meta-analyzed. Mean age was 56.4 years old, 59% were men, and 15% were kidney transplant recipients. Fat malabsorption (88%) was the most commonly attributed cause of oxalate nephropathy, followed by excessive dietary oxalate consumption (20%). The mean baseline serum creatinine was 1.3 mg/dl and peaked at 4.6 mg/dl. Proteinuria, hematuria, and urinary crystals was reported in 69%, 32%, and 26% of patients, respectively. Mean 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion was 85.4 mg/d. In addition to universal oxalate crystal deposition in tubules and/or interstitium, kidney biopsy findings included acute tubular injury (71%), tubular damage and atrophy (69%), and interstitial mononuclear cell infiltration (72%); 55% of patients required dialysis. None had complete recovery, 42% had partial recovery, and 58% remained dialysis-dependent. Thirty-three percent of patients died.

Conclusion

Secondary oxalate nephropathy is a rare but potentially devastating condition. Renal replacement therapy is required in >50% of patients, and most patients remain dialysis-dependent. Studies are needed for effective preventive and treatment strategies in high-risk patients with hyperoxaluria-enabling conditions.

SUBMITTER: Lumlertgul N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6224620 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Secondary Oxalate Nephropathy: A Systematic Review.

Lumlertgul Nuttha N Siribamrungwong Monchai M Jaber Bertrand L BL Susantitaphong Paweena P

Kidney international reports 20180729 6

<h4>Introduction</h4>Little is known of the clinical outcomes of secondary oxalate nephropathy. To inform clinical practice, we performed a systematic review of case reports and case series to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with secondary oxalate nephropathy.<h4>Methods</h4>Electronic databases were searched for case reports and case series of individual cases or cohorts of patients with biopsy-proven oxalate nephropathy in native or transplanted kidneys from 1950 ...[more]

PMID: 30450463

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this study was to report the prevalence and mortality associated with anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN) through a systematic review of the literature.MethodsElectronic searches were conducted in the Medline and EMBASE databases, and manual searches were performed in the reference lists of the identified studies. The studies were selected by two independent researchers, first by evaluating the titles and abstracts and then by reading the complete texts of the identified studies. Case series, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies and case-control studies reporting the prevalence and factors associated with ARN were selected. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses of the prevalence of ARN and 5-year mortality using the random effects model were performed when possible. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic.ResultsFive studies were included. Prevalence of ARN ranged from 19% to 63% among the four included cohort studies. Meta-analysis of these resulted in high heterogeneity [I 2 96%, summary effect 31%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22-42%]. Subgroup meta-analysis yielded an ARN prevalence of 20% among studies that included patients with fewer comorbidities (I 2 12%; 95% CI 19-22%). In a direct comparison, meta-analysis of the 5-year mortality rate between anticoagulated patients who had experienced ARN and anticoagulated patients without ARN, patients with ARN were 91% more likely to die (risk ratio = 1.91; 95% CI 1.22-3; I 2 87%). Risk factors for ARN that were reported in the literature included initial excessive anticoagulation, chronic kidney disease, age, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and heart failure.ConclusionsARN studies are scarce and heterogeneous, and present significant methodological limitations. The high prevalence of ARN reported herein suggests that this entity is underdiagnosed in clinical practice. Mortality in patients with ARN seems to be high compared with patients without this condition in observational studies.

Project description:ObjectivesTo look at the available literature on validated prediction models for contrast induced nephropathy and describe their characteristics.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, and CINAHL (cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature) databases.Review methodsDatabases searched from inception to 2015, and the retrieved reference lists hand searched. Dual reviews were conducted to identify studies published in the English language of prediction models tested with patients that included derivation and validation cohorts. Data were extracted on baseline patient characteristics, procedural characteristics, modelling methods, metrics of model performance, risk of bias, and clinical usefulness. Eligible studies evaluated characteristics of predictive models that identified patients at risk of contrast induced nephropathy among adults undergoing a diagnostic or interventional procedure using conventional radiocontrast media (media used for computed tomography or angiography, and not gadolinium based contrast).Results16 studies were identified, describing 12 prediction models. Substantial interstudy heterogeneity was identified, as a result of different clinical settings, cointerventions, and the timing of creatinine measurement to define contrast induced nephropathy. Ten models were validated internally and six were validated externally. Discrimination varied in studies that were validated internally (C statistic 0.61-0.95) and externally (0.57-0.86). Only one study presented reclassification indices. The majority of higher performing models included measures of pre-existing chronic kidney disease, age, diabetes, heart failure or impaired ejection fraction, and hypotension or shock. No prediction model evaluated its effect on clinical decision making or patient outcomes.ConclusionsMost predictive models for contrast induced nephropathy in clinical use have modest ability, and are only relevant to patients receiving contrast for coronary angiography. Further research is needed to develop models that can better inform patient centred decision making, as well as improve the use of prevention strategies for contrast induced nephropathy.

Dataset Information

Secondary Oxalate Nephropathy: A Systematic Review.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Secondary Oxalate Nephropathy: A Systematic Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure