Dataset Information

Consent for Genetic Biobanking in a Diverse Multisite CKD Cohort.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The goal of this study was to examine patterns in the likelihood of consent to genetic research among participants in a prospective kidney disease cohort and biobank, and to determine demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors linked to consent for ongoing and future genetic research.

Methods

The Clinical Phenotyping Resource and Biobank Core (C-PROBE) enrolled 1628 adult and pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease from 2009 to 2017 across 7 sites in the United States. Participants were asked at annual study visits for consent to provide DNA samples for future genetic studies. We compared characteristics of participants by initial consent outcome and consent status at their most recent study visit.

Results

Of the C-PROBE participants, 96% consented to genetic studies at their initial study visit. Although African Americans were slightly less likely to consent at baseline (93% vs. 97%, odds ratio = 0.3, P < 0.02), there were no significant racial or ethnic differences with longitudinal participation. Also, pediatric and adult genetic consent rates were equivalent. The major persistent differences in the likelihood of consent were based on enrollment site, which ranged from 85% to 100% (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Overall, genetic consent rates for kidney research within the C-PROBE cohort were high. However, differences in consent rates over time and by recruitment site highlight the complexity of genetic consent for biobanking, and potential limitations for generalizability of observations.

SUBMITTER: Troost JP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6224781 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Consent for Genetic Biobanking in a Diverse Multisite CKD Cohort.

Troost Jonathan P JP Hawkins Jennifer J Jenkins Daniel R DR Gipson Debbie S DS Kretzler Matthias M El Shamy Osama O Bellovich Keith K Perumal Kalyani K Bhat Zeenat Z Massengill Susan S Steigerwalt Susan S Pennathur Subramaniam S Brosius Frank C FC Gadegbeku Crystal A CA

Kidney international reports 20180612 6

<h4>Introduction</h4>The goal of this study was to examine patterns in the likelihood of consent to genetic research among participants in a prospective kidney disease cohort and biobank, and to determine demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors linked to consent for ongoing and future genetic research.<h4>Methods</h4>The Clinical Phenotyping Resource and Biobank Core (C-PROBE) enrolled 1628 adult and pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease from 2009 to 2017 across 7 sites in the ...[more]

PMID: 30450453

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Efforts to improve informed consent have led to calls for providing information a reasonable person would want to have, in a way that facilitates understanding of the reasons why one might or might not want to participate. At the same time, advances in large-scale genomic research have expanded both the opportunities and the risks for participants, families, and communities. To advance the use of effective consent materials that reflect this landscape, we used empirical data to develop model consent language, as well as brief questions to assist people in thinking about their own values relative to participation. METHODS:We conducted in-person interviews to gather preliminary input on these materials from a diverse sample (n?=?32) of the general population in Nashville, Tennessee. We asked them to highlight information they found especially reassuring or concerning, their hypothetical willingness to participate, and their opinions about the values questions. RESULTS:Consent information most often highlighted as reassuring included the purpose of the biobank, the existence and composition of a multidisciplinary oversight committee, the importance of participants' privacy and efforts to protect it, and controlled access to a scientific database. Information most often highlighted as concerning included the deposition of data in a publicly accessible database, the risk of unintended access to data, the potential for non-research use of data, and use of medical record information in general. Seventy-five percent of participants indicated initial willingness to participate in the hypothetical biobank; this decreased to 66% as participants more closely considered the information over the course of the interview. A large majority rated the values questions as helpful. CONCLUSIONS:These results are consistent with other research on public perspectives on biobanking and genomic cohort studies, suggesting that our model language effectively captures commonly expressed reasons for and against participation. Our study enriches this literature by connecting specific consent form disclosures with qualitative data regarding what participants found especially reassuring or concerning and why. Interventions that facilitate individuals' closer engagement with consent information may result in participation decisions more closely aligned with their values.

Project description:ContextBiobanks are important resources which enable large-scale genomic research with human samples and data, raising significant ethical concerns about how participants' information is managed and shared. Three previous studies of the Canadian public's opinion about these topics have been conducted. Building on those results, an online survey representing the first study of public perceptions about biobanking spanning all Canadian provinces was conducted. Specifically, this study examined qualitative views about biobank objectives, governance structure, control and ownership of samples and data, benefit sharing, consent practices and data sharing norms, as well as additional questions and ethical concerns expressed by the public.ResultsOver half the respondents preferred to give a one-time general consent for the future sharing of their samples among researchers. Most expressed willingness for their data to be shared with the international scientific community rather than used by one or more Canadian institutions. Whereas more respondents indicated a preference for one-time general consent than any other model of consent, they constituted less than half of the total responses, revealing a lack of consensus among survey respondents regarding this question. Respondents identified biobank objectives, governance structure and accountability as the most important information to provide participants. Respondents' concerns about biobanking generally centred around the control and ownership of biological samples and data, especially with respect to potential misuse by insurers, the government and other third parties. Although almost half the respondents suggested that these should be managed by the researchers' institutions, results indicate that the public is interested in being well-informed about these projects and suggest the importance of increased involvement from participants. In conclusion, the study discusses the viability of several proposed models for informed consent, including e-governance, independent trustees and the use of exclusion clauses, in the context of these new findings about the views of the Canadian public.

Project description:BackgroundCastleman disease (CD) describes a group of rare and poorly understood lymphoproliferative disorders that include unicentric CD (UCD), Human Herpes Virus-8 (HHV8)-associated multicentric CD (HHV8 + MCD), and HHV8-negative/idiopathic MCD (iMCD). Efforts to advance research and drug discovery for CD have been slowed by challenges shared by other rare diseases, such as collecting and centralizing data and biospecimens for research. To collect disease characteristic data and identify individuals interested in contributing biospecimens for research, a global research organization - the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN) - established an international Contact Database and electronic repository (E-repository). Herein, we performed analyses of these datasets to further characterize CD and gain insights into research biospecimen acquisition.ResultsDescriptive statistical analyses were performed on 891 participants from the Contact Database and 166 patients in the E-repository. The median age of patients at the time of enrollment in the Contact Database and E-repository was 42 ± 15.7 and 35 ± 14.8, respectively. The E-repository had increased representation from patients with MCD and the iMCD subtype compared to other sub-groups. Though the majority of participants were from the USA, a total of 49 countries on 6 continents were represented. Several patient characteristics in the Contact Database were associated with subsequent enrollment in the E-repository. There were significantly more MCD patients (p < 0.0001) and females (p = 0.002) enrolled in the E-repository compared to the Contact Database. Patient's year of birth, date of registration, preferred method of communication, and relationship to the patient were also significantly associated with enrollment in the e-Repository.ConclusionsThis study of the largest- dataset of CD patients worldwide provides insights into disease phenotypes, characteristics of patients interested in contributing data and biospecimens for research, and methods for successfully acquiring data and biospecimens. Generally, the factors associated with enrollment in the E-repository represented severity of disease subtype, proximity to the research, and patient motivation. We hope that these findings and the sample documentation (e.g., electronic consent, recruitment materials) provided with this article will assist future rare disease efforts with overcoming hurdles.

Dataset Information

Consent for Genetic Biobanking in a Diverse Multisite CKD Cohort.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Consent for Genetic Biobanking in a Diverse Multisite CKD Cohort.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets