A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Caufield JH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6235242 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts.
Caufield John Harry JH Liem David A DA Garlid Anders O AO Zhou Yijiang Y Watson Karol K Bui Alex A T AAT Wang Wei W Ping Peipei P
Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE 20180920 139
Clinical case reports (CCRs) are a valuable means of sharing observations and insights in medicine. The form of these documents varies, and their content includes descriptions of numerous, novel disease presentations and treatments. Thus far, the text data within CCRs is largely unstructured, requiring significant human and computational effort to render these data useful for in-depth analysis. In this protocol, we describe methods for identifying metadata corresponding to specific biomedical co ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Clinical case reports (CCRs) provide an important means of sharing clinical experiences about atypical disease phenotypes and new therapies. However, published case reports contain largely unstructured and heterogeneous clinical data, posing a challenge to mining relevant information. Current indexing approaches generally concern document-level features and have not been specifically designed for CCRs. To address this disparity, we developed a standardized metadata template and identified text corresponding to medical concepts within 3,100 curated CCRs spanning 15 disease groups and more than 750 reports of rare diseases. We also prepared a subset of metadata on reports on selected mitochondrial diseases and assigned ICD-10 diagnostic codes to each. The resulting resource, Metadata Acquired from Clinical Case Reports (MACCRs), contains text associated with high-level clinical concepts, including demographics, disease presentation, treatments, and outcomes for each report. Our template and MACCR set render CCRs more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) while serving as valuable resources for key user groups, including researchers, physician investigators, clinicians, data scientists, and those shaping government policies for clinical trials.
| S-EPMC6244181 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesConcept embeddings are low-dimensional vector representations of concepts such as MeSH:D009203 (Myocardial Infarction), whose similarity in the embedded vector space reflects their semantic similarity. Here, we test the hypothesis that non-biomedical concept synonym replacement can improve the quality of biomedical concepts embeddings.Materials and methodsWe developed an approach that leverages WordNet to replace sets of synonyms with the most common representative of the synonym set.ResultsWe tested our approach on 1055 concept sets and found that, on average, the mean intra-cluster distance was reduced by 8% in the vector-space. Assuming that homophily of related concepts in the vector space is desirable, our approach tends to improve the quality of embeddings.Discussion and conclusionThis pilot study shows that non-biomedical synonym replacement tends to improve the quality of embeddings of biomedical concepts using the Word2Vec algorithm. We have implemented our approach in a freely available Python package available at https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/wn2vec.
| S-EPMC11244985 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundExtracting relevant information about infectious diseases is an essential task. However, a significant obstacle in supporting public health research is the lack of methods for effectively mining large amounts of health data.ObjectiveThis study aims to use natural language processing (NLP) to extract the key information (clinical factors, social determinants of health) from published cases in the literature.MethodsThe proposed framework integrates a data layer for preparing a data cohort from clinical case reports; an NLP layer to find the clinical and demographic-named entities and relations in the texts; and an evaluation layer for benchmarking performance and analysis. The focus of this study is to extract valuable information from COVID-19 case reports.ResultsThe named entity recognition implementation in the NLP layer achieves a performance gain of about 1-3% compared to benchmark methods. Furthermore, even without extensive data labeling, the relation extraction method outperforms benchmark methods in terms of accuracy (by 1-8% better). A thorough examination reveals the disease's presence and symptoms prevalence in patients.ConclusionsA similar approach can be generalized to other infectious diseases. It is worthwhile to use prior knowledge acquired through transfer learning when researching other infectious diseases.
| S-EPMC9879259 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionComputable biomedical knowledge artifacts (CBKs) are digital objects conveying biomedical knowledge in machine-interpretable structures. As more CBKs are produced and their complexity increases, the value obtained from sharing CBKs grows. Mobilizing CBKs and sharing them widely can only be achieved if the CBKs are findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable, and trustable (FAIR+T). To help mobilize CBKs, we describe our efforts to outline metadata categories to make CBKs FAIR+T.MethodsWe examined the literature regarding metadata with the potential to make digital artifacts FAIR+T. We also examined metadata available online today for actual CBKs of 12 different types. With iterative refinement, we came to a consensus on key categories of metadata that, when taken together, can make CBKs FAIR+T. We use subject-predicate-object triples to more clearly differentiate metadata categories.ResultsWe defined 13 categories of CBK metadata most relevant to making CBKs FAIR+T. Eleven of these categories (type, domain, purpose, identification, location, CBK-to-CBK relationships, technical, authorization and rights management, provenance, evidential basis, and evidence from use metadata) are evident today where CBKs are stored online. Two additional categories (preservation and integrity metadata) were not evident in our examples. We provide a research agenda to guide further study and development of these and other metadata categories.ConclusionA wide variety of metadata elements in various categories is needed to make CBKs FAIR+T. More work is needed to develop a common framework for CBK metadata that can make CBKs FAIR+T for all stakeholders.
| S-EPMC8753304 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a rich community resource containing millions of gene expression experiments from human, mouse, rat, and other model organisms. However, information about each experiment (metadata) is in the format of an open-ended, non-standardized textual description provided by the depositor. Thus, classification of experiments for meta-analysis by factors such as gender, age of the sample donor, and tissue of origin is not feasible without assigning labels to the experiments. Automated approaches are preferable for this, primarily because of the size and volume of the data to be processed, but also because it ensures standardization and consistency. While some of these labels can be extracted directly from the textual metadata, many of the data available do not contain explicit text informing the researcher about the age and gender of the subjects with the study. To bridge this gap, machine-learning methods can be trained to use the gene expression patterns associated with the text-derived labels to refine label-prediction confidence.ResultsOur analysis shows only 26% of metadata text contains information about gender and 21% about age. In order to ameliorate the lack of available labels for these data sets, we first extract labels from the textual metadata for each GEO RNA dataset and evaluate the performance against a gold standard of manually curated labels. We then use machine-learning methods to predict labels, based upon gene expression of the samples and compare this to the text-based method.ConclusionHere we present an automated method to extract labels for age, gender, and tissue from textual metadata and GEO data using both a heuristic approach as well as machine learning. We show the two methods together improve accuracy of label assignment to GEO samples.
| S-EPMC5751806 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMetadata are created to describe the corresponding data in a detailed and unambiguous way and is used for various applications in different research areas, for example, data identification and classification. However, a clear definition of metadata is crucial for further use. Unfortunately, extensive experience with the processing and management of metadata has shown that the term "metadata" and its use is not always unambiguous.ObjectiveThis study aimed to understand the definition of metadata and the challenges resulting from metadata reuse.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in this study following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for reporting on systematic reviews. Five research questions were identified to streamline the review process, addressing metadata characteristics, metadata standards, use cases, and problems encountered. This review was preceded by a harmonization process to achieve a general understanding of the terms used.ResultsThe harmonization process resulted in a clear set of definitions for metadata processing focusing on data integration. The following literature review was conducted by 10 reviewers with different backgrounds and using the harmonized definitions. This study included 81 peer-reviewed papers from the last decade after applying various filtering steps to identify the most relevant papers. The 5 research questions could be answered, resulting in a broad overview of the standards, use cases, problems, and corresponding solutions for the application of metadata in different research areas.ConclusionsMetadata can be a powerful tool for identifying, describing, and processing information, but its meaningful creation is costly and challenging. This review process uncovered many standards, use cases, problems, and solutions for dealing with metadata. The presented harmonized definitions and the new schema have the potential to improve the classification and generation of metadata by creating a shared understanding of metadata and its context.
| S-EPMC8790684 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP), particularly contextual word embedding models, have improved knowledge extraction from biomedical and healthcare texts. However, limited comprehensive research compares these models. This study conducts a scoping review and compares the performance of the major contextual word embedding models for biomedical knowledge extraction. From 26 articles identified from Scopus, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar between 2017 and 2021, 18 notable contextual word embedding models were identified. These include ELMo, BERT, BioBERT, BlueBERT, CancerBERT, DDS-BERT, RuBERT, LABSE, EhrBERT, MedBERT, Clinical BERT, Clinical BioBERT, Discharge Summary BERT, Discharge Summary BioBERT, GPT, GPT-2, GPT-3, and GPT2-Bio-Pt. A case study compared the performance of six representative models-ELMo, BERT, BioBERT, BlueBERT, Clinical BioBERT, and GPT-3-across text classification, named entity recognition, and question answering. The evaluation utilized datasets comprising biomedical text from tweets, NCBI, PubMed, and clinical notes sourced from two electronic health record datasets. Performance metrics, including accuracy and F1 score, were used. The results of this case study reveal that BioBERT performs the best in analyzing biomedical text, while Clinical BioBERT excels in analyzing clinical notes. These findings offer crucial insights into word embedding models for researchers, practitioners, and stakeholders utilizing NLP in biomedical and clinical document analysis.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-023-00157-y.
| S-EPMC10805696 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNetwork concepts are increasingly used in biology and genetics. For example, the clustering coefficient has been used to understand network architecture; the connectivity (also known as degree) has been used to screen for cancer targets; and the topological overlap matrix has been used to define modules and to annotate genes. Dozens of potentially useful network concepts are known from graph theory.ResultsHere we study network concepts in special types of networks, which we refer to as approximately factorizable networks. In these networks, the pairwise connection strength (adjacency) between 2 network nodes can be factored into node specific contributions, named node 'conformity'. The node conformity turns out to be highly related to the connectivity. To provide a formalism for relating network concepts to each other, we define three types of network concepts: fundamental-, conformity-based-, and approximate conformity-based concepts. Fundamental concepts include the standard definitions of connectivity, density, centralization, heterogeneity, clustering coefficient, and topological overlap. The approximate conformity-based analogs of fundamental network concepts have several theoretical advantages. First, they allow one to derive simple relationships between seemingly disparate networks concepts. For example, we derive simple relationships between the clustering coefficient, the heterogeneity, the density, the centralization, and the topological overlap. The second advantage of approximate conformity-based network concepts is that they allow one to show that fundamental network concepts can be approximated by simple functions of the connectivity in module networks.ConclusionUsing protein-protein interaction, gene co-expression, and simulated data, we show that a) many networks comprised of module nodes are approximately factorizable and b) in these types of networks, simple relationships exist between seemingly disparate network concepts. Our results are implemented in freely available R software code, which can be downloaded from the following webpage: http://www.genetics.ucla.edu/labs/horvath/ModuleConformity/ModuleNetworks.
| S-EPMC3238286 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOntology term labels can be ambiguous and have multiple senses. While this is no problem for human annotators, it is a challenge to automated methods, which identify ontology terms in text. Classical approaches to word sense disambiguation use co-occurring words or terms. However, most treat ontologies as simple terminologies, without making use of the ontology structure or the semantic similarity between terms. Another useful source of information for disambiguation are metadata. Here, we systematically compare three approaches to word sense disambiguation, which use ontologies and metadata, respectively.ResultsThe 'Closest Sense' method assumes that the ontology defines multiple senses of the term. It computes the shortest path of co-occurring terms in the document to one of these senses. The 'Term Cooc' method defines a log-odds ratio for co-occurring terms including co-occurrences inferred from the ontology structure. The 'MetaData' approach trains a classifier on metadata. It does not require any ontology, but requires training data, which the other methods do not. To evaluate these approaches we defined a manually curated training corpus of 2600 documents for seven ambiguous terms from the Gene Ontology and MeSH. All approaches over all conditions achieve 80% success rate on average. The 'MetaData' approach performed best with 96%, when trained on high-quality data. Its performance deteriorates as quality of the training data decreases. The 'Term Cooc' approach performs better on Gene Ontology (92% success) than on MeSH (73% success) as MeSH is not a strict is-a/part-of, but rather a loose is-related-to hierarchy. The 'Closest Sense' approach achieves on average 80% success rate.ConclusionMetadata is valuable for disambiguation, but requires high quality training data. Closest Sense requires no training, but a large, consistently modelled ontology, which are two opposing conditions. Term Cooc achieves greater 90% success given a consistently modelled ontology. Overall, the results show that well structured ontologies can play a very important role to improve disambiguation.AvailabilityThe three benchmark datasets created for the purpose of disambiguation are available in Additional file 1.
| S-EPMC2663782 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pharmaceutical products are indispensable for improving health outcomes. An extensive body of work on access to and use of medicines has resulted in an assortment of tools measuring various elements of pharmaceutical systems. Until now however, there has been little attempt to conceptualize a pharmaceutical system as an entity and define its strengthening in a way that allows for measuring systems strengthening. The narrow focus of available tools limits their value in ascertaining which interventions result in stronger, more resilient systems. We sought to address this shortcoming by revisiting the current definitions, frameworks and assessment tools related to pharmaceutical systems. We conducted a comprehensive literature review and consulted with select pharmaceutical experts. On the basis of our review, we propose that a pharmaceutical system consists of all structures, people, resources, processes, and their interactions within the broader health system that aim to ensure equitable and timely access to safe, effective, quality pharmaceutical products and related services that promote their appropriate and cost-effective use to improve health outcomes. We further propose that pharmaceutical systems strengthening is the process of identifying and implementing strategies and actions that achieve coordinated and sustainable improvements in the critical components of a pharmaceutical system to make it more responsive and resilient and to enhance its performance for achieving better health outcomes. Finally, we established that, in addition to system performance and resilience, seven components of the pharmaceutical system are critical for measuring pharmaceutical systems strengthening: pharmaceutical products and related services; policy, laws and governance; regulatory systems; innovation, research and development, manufacturing, and trade; financing; human resources; and information. This work adds clarity to the concept of pharmaceutical systems and their strengthening by proposing holistic definitions on the basis of systems thinking. It provides a practical starting point for measuring the progress of pharmaceutical systems strengthening.
| S-EPMC5400040 | biostudies-literature