Dataset Information

Comparison of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula blood flow rates measured by Doppler ultrasound and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to compare blood flow rates measured by Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients having a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and to identify scenarios in which there was significant discordance between these two approaches. METHODS:Blood flow rates in the proximal artery (PA) and draining vein (DV) of newly created upper extremity AVFs were measured and compared using DUS and phase-contrast MRI at 1 day, 6 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS:Blood flow rates in the PA measured by DUS (1155 ± 907 mL/min, mean ± standard deviation) and by MRI (1170 ± 657 mL/min) were not statistically different (P = .812) based on 78 data pairs from 49 patients. DV DUS flow (1277 ± 995 mL/min) and MRI flow (1130 ± 655 mL/min) were also not statistically different (P = .071) based on 64 data pairs. In both PA and DV, the two methods substantially agreed with each other (Cohen ?: PA, 0.66; DV, 0.67) when flow rates were put into four clinically relevant categories (<300, 300-599, 600-1499, and ?1500 mL/min). The Bland-Altman analyses of DUS and MRI flow identified six and four outliers for PA and DV, respectively. Seven outliers had higher DUS than MRI flow, with all DUS scan sites having a large lumen or significant local curvature; the other three had lower DUS flow, partly due to an underestimation of lumen diameter by DUS. CONCLUSIONS:DUS and MRI flow rates are generally comparable in both PA and DV. When DUS is used for flow measurements, careful attention to accurate lumen diameter measurements is needed and scan sites with marked curvature should be avoided. Our result may improve the accuracy of DUS-measured AVF blood flow rate.

SUBMITTER: He Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6240398 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula blood flow rates measured by Doppler ultrasound and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

He Yong Y Shiu Yan-Ting YT Pike Daniel B DB Roy-Chaudhury Prabir P Cheung Alfred K AK Berceli Scott A SA

Journal of vascular surgery 20180518 6

<h4>Objective</h4>The objective of this study was to compare blood flow rates measured by Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients having a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and to identify scenarios in which there was significant discordance between these two approaches.<h4>Methods</h4>Blood flow rates in the proximal artery (PA) and draining vein (DV) of newly created upper extremity AVFs were measured and compared using DUS and phase-cont ...[more]

PMID: 29779960

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThis study analyzed the long-term arteriovenous fistula (AVF) patency rate and its determinants in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.MethodsGeneral data and laboratory examinations of hemodialysis patients were collected retrospectively. The primary patency time, primary functional patency time, cumulative patency time, cumulative functional patency time, and temporary central venous catheterization (CVC) time were counted. Cox regression was used to analyze the relationships between different factors and AVF survival time. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to analyze the primary patency, primary functional patency, cumulative patency, and cumulative functional patency rates between different groups.ResultsA total of 174 patients were included (mean age 58.38 ± 15.35 years), 57 women (32.76%) and 68 diabetics (39.08%). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression showed a correlation between UCR and AVF primary patency time, primary functional patency time, cumulative patency time, and cumulative functional patency time (HR 1.127, 1.116, 1.127, 1.115, 1.088, 1.075, 1.087, 1.013; 95%CI 1.055-1.204, 1.043-1.194, 1.055-1.204, 1.042-1.194, 1.022-1.158, 1.006-1.149, 1.021-1.157, 1.004-1.147; p < 0.001, 0.001, <0.001, 0.002, 0.008, 0.033, 0.009, 0.039, respectively). Duration of temporary CVC was also correlated (HR 1.013, 1.013, 1.013, 1.014, 1.008, 1.008, 1.008, 1.008; 95%CI 1.007-1.018, 1.008-1.019, 1.008-1.019, 1.009-1.020, 1.004-1.012, 1.004-1.012, 1.004-1.012, 1.004-1.012; p < 0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). Female sex was correlated with the primary patency time and the primary functional patency time (HR 1.755, 1.765, 1.767; 95%CI 1.028-2.997, 1.034-3.014, 1.021-3.057; p = 0.039, 0.037, 0.042, respectively), but not with the cumulative patency time and the cumulative functional patency time, the primary patency rate and primary functional patency rate of AVF were higher in male than in female patients (χ2 = 4.439, 4.531; p = 0.035, 0.033, respectively). The primary patency rate, primary functional patency rate, cumulative patency rate, and cumulative functional patency rate of AVF with UCR > 10.11 group are lower than those with UCR ≤ 10.11 (χ2 = 10.745, 10.712, 4.605, 4.472; p = 0.001, 0.001, 0.032, 0.034, respectively). The group of DTCP ≤ 42 days is better than DTCP > 42 days (χ2 = 6.014, 6.055, 8.572, 8.461; p = 0.014, 0.014, 0.003, 0.004, respectively).ConclusionWomen with high UCR values at the beginning of dialysis and a long duration of temporary CVC have a poor long-term survival rate of AVF. Therefore, UCR can be used as an indicator to predict the long-term survival rate of AVF. Simultaneously, clinicians should remove the temporary catheter as early as possible if conditions permit it.

Project description:ImportanceInitial hemodialysis access with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with arteriovenous graft (AVG) and should be the procedure of choice whenever possible. To address the national underuse of AVF in the United States, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid has established an AVF goal of 66% or greater in 2009.ObjectiveTo explore contemporary practice patterns and physician characteristics associated with high AVG use compared with AVF use.Design, setting, and participantsThis review of 100% Medicare Carrier claims between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, includes both inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims data. All patients undergoing initial permanent hemodialysis access placement with an AVF or AVG were included. All surgeons performing more than 10 hemodialysis access procedures during the study period were analyzed.ExposuresPlacement of an AVF or AVG for initial permanent hemodialysis access.Main outcomes and measuresA surgeon-level AVG (vs AVF) use rate was calculated for all included surgeons. Hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to identify patient-level and surgeon-level factors associated with AVG use.ResultsA total of 85 320 patients (median age, 70 [range, 18-103] years; 47 370 men [55.5%]) underwent first-time hemodialysis access placement, of whom 66 489 (77.9%) had an AVF and 18 831 (22.1%) had an AVG. Among the 2397 surgeons who performed more than 10 procedures per year, the median surgeon level AVG use rate was 18.2% (range, 0.0%-96.4%). However, 498 surgeons (20.8%) had an AVG use rate greater than 34%. After accounting for patient characteristics, surgeon factors that were independently associated with AVG use included more than 30 years of clinical practice (vs 21-30 years; odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96]), metropolitan setting (odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.02-1.54]), and vascular surgery specialty (vs general surgery; odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.86]). Surgeons in the Northeast region had the lowest rate of AVG use (vs the South; odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.96]). First-time hemodialysis access benchmarking reports for individual surgeons were created for potential distribution.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, one-fifth of surgeons had an AVG use rate above the recommended best practices guideline of 34%. Although some of these differences may be explained by patient referral practices, sharing benchmarked performance data with surgeons could be an actionable step in achieving more high-value care in hemodialysis access surgery.

Dataset Information

Comparison of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula blood flow rates measured by Doppler ultrasound and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Publications

Comparison of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula blood flow rates measured by Doppler ultrasound and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets