Dataset Information

Mixed TDP-43 proteinopathy and tauopathy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: nine case series.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:To determine the clinical, anatomical, genetic and pathological features of dual frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathology: FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP-43 in a large clinicopathological cohort. METHODS:We selected subjects with mixed FTLD-TDP and FTLD-tau from 247 FTLD cases from the University of California, San Francisco, Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank collected between 2000 and 2016 and compared their clinical, anatomical, genetic, imaging and pathological signatures with those of subjects with pure FTLD. RESULTS:We found nine cases (3.6%) with prominent FTLD-TDP and FTLD-tau. Six cases were sporadic, whereas one case had a C9ORF72 expansion, another had a TARDBP A90V variant, and the other had an MAPT p.A152T variant. The subtypes of FTLD-TDP and FTLD-tau varied. Mixed FTLD cases were older and tended to show a higher burden of Alzheimer disease pathology (3/9, 33%). The neuroimaging signature of mixed cases, in general, included more widespread atrophy than that of pure groups. Specifically, cases of mixed corticobasal degeneration (CBD) with FTLD-TDP showed more prominent asymmetric left-sided atrophy than did those of pure CBD. However, the clinical phenotype of mixed cases was similar to that seen in pure FTLD. CONCLUSIONS:Although patients with mixed FTLD-TDP and FTLD-tau are rare, in-depth clinical, pathological and genetic investigations may shed light on the genetic and biochemical pathways that cause the accumulation of multiple proteinaceous inclusions and inform therapeutic targets that may be beneficial to each one of these abnormal protein misfoldings.

SUBMITTER: Kim EJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6245666 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Mixed TDP-43 proteinopathy and tauopathy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: nine case series.

Kim Eun-Joo EJ Brown Jesse A JA Deng Jersey J Hwang Ji-Hye L JL Spina Salvatore S Miller Zachary A ZA DeMay Mary G MG Valcour Victor V Karydas Anna A Ramos Eliana Marisa EM Coppola Giovanni G Miller Bruce L BL Rosen Howard J HJ Seeley William W WW Grinberg Lea T LT

Journal of neurology 20181015 12

<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine the clinical, anatomical, genetic and pathological features of dual frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathology: FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP-43 in a large clinicopathological cohort.<h4>Methods</h4>We selected subjects with mixed FTLD-TDP and FTLD-tau from 247 FTLD cases from the University of California, San Francisco, Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank collected between 2000 and 2016 and compared their clinical, anatomical, genetic, imaging and pathological s ...[more]

PMID: 30324308

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceBiomarkers are lacking that can discriminate frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) associated with tau (FTLD-tau) or TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP).ObjectiveTo test whether plasma biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), or their ratio (GFAP/NfL) differ between FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included data from 2009 to 2020 from the University of Pennsylvania Integrated Neurodegenerative Disease Database, with a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 2 (0.3-4.2) years. The training sample was composed of patients with autopsy-confirmed and familial FTLD; nonimpaired controls were included as a reference group. The independent validation sample included patients with FTD with a clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome (PSPS) associated with tau (PSPS-tau) or amytrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) associated with TDP-43 (ALS-TDP). In patients with FTLD with autopsy-confirmed or variant-confirmed pathology, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves tested the GFAP/NfL ratio and established a pathology-confirmed cut point. The cut point was validated in an independent sample of patients with clinical frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Data were analyzed from February to July 2022.ExposuresClinical, postmortem histopathological assessments, and plasma collection.Main outcomes and measuresROC and area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 90% CIs evaluated discrimination of pure FTLD-tau from pure FTLD-TDP using plasma GFAP/NfL ratio; the Youden index established optimal cut points. Sensitivity and specificity of cut points were assessed in an independent validation sample.ResultsOf 349 participants with available plasma data, 234 met inclusion criteria (31 controls, 141 in the training sample, and 62 in the validation sample). In the training sample, patients with FTLD-tau were older than patients with FTLD-TDP (FTLD-tau: n = 46; mean [SD] age, 65.8 [8.29] years; FTLD-TDP: n = 95; mean [SD] age, 62.3 [7.82] years; t84.6 = 2.45; mean difference, 3.57; 95% CI, 0.67-6.48; P = .02) but with similar sex distribution (FTLD-tau: 27 of 46 [59%] were male; FTLD-TDP: 51 of 95 [54%] were male; χ21 = 0.14; P = .70). In the validation sample, patients with PSPS-tau were older than those with ALS-TDP (PSPS-tau: n = 31; mean [SD] age, 69.3 [7.35] years; ALS-TDP: n = 31; mean [SD] age, 54.6 [10.17] years; t54.6 = 6.53; mean difference, 14.71; 95% CI, 10.19-19.23; P < .001) and had fewer patients who were male (PSPS-tau: 9 of 31 [29%] were male; ALS-TDP: 22 of 31 [71%] were male; χ21 = 9.3; P = .002). ROC revealed excellent discrimination of FTLD-tau from FTLD-TDP by plasma GFAP/NfL ratio (AUC = 0.89; 90% CI, 0.82-0.95; sensitivity = 0.73; 90% CI, 0.65-0.89; specificity = 0.89; 90% CI, 0.78-0.98), which was higher than either GFAP level alone (AUC = 0.65; 90% CI, 0.54-0.76) or NfL levels alone (AUC = 0.75; 90% CI, 0.64-0.85). In the validation sample, there was sensitivity of 0.84 (90% CI, 0.66-0.94) and specificity of 0.81 (90% CI, 0.62-0.91) when applying the autopsy-derived plasma GFAP/NfL threshold.Conclusions and relevanceThe plasma ratio of GFAP/NfL may discriminate FTLD-tau from FTLD-TDP.

Project description:TAR-DNA binding protein-43 (TDP-43) proteinopathy is seen in multiple brain diseases. A standardized terminology was recommended recently for common age-related TDP-43 proteinopathy: limbic-predominant, age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) and the underlying neuropathological changes, LATE-NC. LATE-NC may be co-morbid with Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes (ADNC). However, there currently are ill-defined diagnostic classification issues among LATE-NC, ADNC, and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP). A practical challenge is that different autopsy cohorts are composed of disparate groups of research volunteers: hospital- and clinic-based cohorts are enriched for FTLD-TDP cases, whereas community-based cohorts have more LATE-NC cases. Neuropathological methods also differ across laboratories. Here, we combined both cases and neuropathologists' diagnoses from two research centres-University of Pennsylvania and University of Kentucky. The study was designed to compare neuropathological findings between FTLD-TDP and pathologically severe LATE-NC. First, cases were selected from the University of Pennsylvania with pathological diagnoses of either FTLD-TDP (n = 33) or severe LATE-NC (mostly stage 3) with co-morbid ADNC (n = 30). Sections from these University of Pennsylvania cases were cut from amygdala, anterior cingulate, superior/mid-temporal, and middle frontal gyrus. These sections were stained for phospho-TDP-43 immunohistochemically and evaluated independently by two University of Kentucky neuropathologists blinded to case data. A simple set of criteria hypothesized to differentiate FTLD-TDP from LATE-NC was generated based on density of TDP-43 immunoreactive neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in the neocortical regions. Criteria-based sensitivity and specificity of differentiating severe LATE-NC from FTLD-TDP cases with blind evaluation was ∼90%. Another proposed neuropathological feature related to TDP-43 proteinopathy in aged individuals is 'Alpha' versus 'Beta' in amygdala. Alpha and Beta status was diagnosed by neuropathologists from both universities (n = 5 raters). There was poor inter-rater reliability of Alpha/Beta classification (mean κ = 0.31). We next tested a separate cohort of cases from University of Kentucky with either FTLD-TDP (n = 8) or with relatively 'pure' severe LATE-NC (lacking intermediate or severe ADNC; n = 14). The simple criteria were applied by neuropathologists blinded to the prior diagnoses at University of Pennsylvania. Again, the criteria for differentiating LATE-NC from FTLD-TDP was effective, with sensitivity and specificity ∼90%. If more representative cases from each cohort (including less severe TDP-43 proteinopathy) had been included, the overall accuracy for identifying LATE-NC was estimated at >98% for both cohorts. Also across both cohorts, cases with FTLD-TDP died younger than those with LATE-NC (P < 0.0001). We conclude that in most cases, severe LATE-NC and FTLD-TDP can be differentiated by applying simple neuropathological criteria.

Dataset Information

Mixed TDP-43 proteinopathy and tauopathy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: nine case series.

Publications

Mixed TDP-43 proteinopathy and tauopathy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: nine case series.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets