Dataset Information

De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017.

ABSTRACT: The 15th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2017 in Vienna, Austria reviewed substantial new evidence on loco-regional and systemic therapies for early breast cancer. Treatments were assessed in light of their intensity, duration and side-effects, seeking where appropriate to escalate or de-escalate therapies based on likely benefits as predicted by tumor stage and tumor biology. The Panel favored several interventions that may reduce surgical morbidity, including acceptance of 2?mm margins for DCIS, the resection of residual cancer (but not baseline extent of cancer) in women undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, acceptance of sentinel node biopsy following neoadjuvant treatment of many patients, and the preference for neoadjuvant therapy in HER2 positive and triple-negative, stage II and III breast cancer. The Panel favored escalating radiation therapy with regional nodal irradiation in high-risk patients, while encouraging omission of boost in low-risk patients. The Panel endorsed gene expression signatures that permit avoidance of chemotherapy in many patients with ER positive breast cancer. For women with higher risk tumors, the Panel escalated recommendations for adjuvant endocrine treatment to include ovarian suppression in premenopausal women, and extended therapy for postmenopausal women. However, low-risk patients can avoid these treatments. Finally, the Panel recommended bisphosphonate use in postmenopausal women to prevent breast cancer recurrence. The Panel recognized that recommendations are not intended for all patients, but rather to address the clinical needs of the majority of common presentations. Individualization of adjuvant therapy means adjusting to the tumor characteristics, patient comorbidities and preferences, and managing constraints of treatment cost and access that may affect care in both the developed and developing world.

SUBMITTER: Curigliano G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6246241 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017.

Curigliano G G Burstein H J HJ Winer E P EP Gnant M M Dubsky P P Loibl S S Colleoni M M Regan M M MM Piccart-Gebhart M M Senn H-J HJ Thürlimann B B André F F Baselga J J Bergh J J Bonnefoi H H Brucker S Y SY Cardoso F F Carey L L Ciruelos E E Cuzick J J Denkert C C Di Leo A A Ejlertsen B B Francis P P Galimberti V V Garber J J Gulluoglu B B Goodwin P P Harbeck N N Hayes D F DF Huang C-S CS Huober J J Hussein K K Jassem J J Jiang Z Z Karlsson P P Morrow M M Orecchia R R Osborne K C KC Pagani O O Partridge A H AH Pritchard K K Ro J J Rutgers E J T EJT Sedlmayer F F Semiglazov V V Shao Z Z Smith I I Toi M M Tutt A A Viale G G Watanabe T T Whelan T J TJ Xu B B

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 20170801 8

The 15th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2017 in Vienna, Austria reviewed substantial new evidence on loco-regional and systemic therapies for early breast cancer. Treatments were assessed in light of their intensity, duration and side-effects, seeking where appropriate to escalate or de-escalate therapies based on likely benefits as predicted by tumor stage and tumor biology. The Panel favored several interventions that may reduce surgical morbidity, including acceptance of 2 ...[more]

PMID: 28838210

Similar Datasets

Project description:The 14th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference (2015) reviewed substantial new evidence on locoregional and systemic therapies for early breast cancer. Further experience has supported the adequacy of tumor margins defined as 'no ink on invasive tumor or DCIS' and the safety of omitting axillary dissection in specific cohorts. Radiotherapy trials support irradiation of regional nodes in node-positive disease. Considering subdivisions within luminal disease, the Panel was more concerned with indications for the use of specific therapies, rather than surrogate identification of intrinsic subtypes as measured by multiparameter molecular tests. For the treatment of HER2-positive disease in patients with node-negative cancers up to 1 cm, the Panel endorsed a simplified regimen comprising paclitaxel and trastuzumab without anthracycline as adjuvant therapy. For premenopausal patients with endocrine responsive disease, the Panel endorsed the role of ovarian function suppression with either tamoxifen or exemestane for patients at higher risk. The Panel noted the value of an LHRH agonist given during chemotherapy for premenopausal women with ER-negative disease in protecting against premature ovarian failure and preserving fertility. The Panel noted increasing evidence for the prognostic value of commonly used multiparameter molecular markers, some of which also carried prognostic information for late relapse. The Panel noted that the results of such tests, where available, were frequently used to assist decisions about the inclusion of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with luminal disease, but noted that threshold values had not been established for this purpose for any of these tests. Multiparameter molecular assays are expensive and therefore unavailable in much of the world. The majority of new breast cancer cases and breast cancer deaths now occur in less developed regions of the world. In these areas, less expensive pathology tests may provide valuable information. The Panel recommendations on treatment are not intended to apply to all patients, but rather to establish norms appropriate for the majority. Again, economic considerations may require that less expensive and only marginally less effective therapies may be necessary in less resourced areas. Panel recommendations do not imply unanimous agreement among Panel members. Indeed, very few of the 200 questions received 100% agreement from the Panel. In the text below, wording is intended to convey the strength of Panel support for each recommendation, while details of Panel voting on each question are available in supplementary Appendix S2, available at Annals of Oncology online.

Project description:PurposeHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive luminal B type comprises estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and HER2-positive cancers, and HER2-negative luminal B type comprises ER-positive cancers showing a Ki-67 labeling index ?14% or progesterone receptor (PR) expression of <20% according to the St. Gallen consensus 2013. The current study aimed to classify intrinsic subtypes according to the St. Gallen consensus 2013 and determine the differences in clinicopathological parameters and survival outcomes among the molecular types, especially among the luminal types.MethodsAssessment of molecular types was performed for 267 invasive ductal carcinomas. The differences in clinicopathological parameters, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) among the molecular types were analyzed.ResultsThe luminal B type was the most prevalent, at 44.9%, followed by the luminal A, triple-negative (including basal-like type), and HER2 type, at 21.7%, 18.7%, and 14.6%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in size (p=0.003), nodal status (p=0.046), histologic grade (p<0.001), p53 (p<0.001) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) positivity (p=0.002), recurrence (p=0.001) and death rates (p=0.036), DFS (p=0.002), and OS (p=0.039) among the molecular types. Significant differences in size (p=0.009), nodal metastasis (p=0.019), histologic grade (p<0.001), p53 positivity (p=0.001), and PR expression (p<0.001) were noted between the luminal A and B types. Among the luminal B type cancers, the distributions of ER and PR scores showed significant differences (p=0.003, p=0.003). p53 positivity in the luminal B type cancers was related to shortened DFS (p=0.034). In luminal type cancers, COX-2 positivity was related to longer DFS (p=0.026).ConclusionDifferent management guidelines should be considered for the luminal A and luminal B breast cancer types. Positive p53 expression in luminal B type cancers and negative COX-2 expression in luminal type cancers seem to be related to poor clinical outcome.

Dataset Information

De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017.

Publications

De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets