Dataset Information

Racial and Ethnic Postoperative Outcomes After Surgery: The Hispanic Paradox.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The Hispanic population in the United States have previously been shown to have, in some cases, better health outcomes than non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) despite having lower socioeconomic status and higher frequency of comorbidities. This epidemiologic finding is coined as the Hispanic Paradox (HP). Few studies have evaluated if the HP exists in surgical patients. Our study aimed to examine postoperative complications between Hispanic and NHW patients undergoing low- to high-risk procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing adult patients who underwent high-, intermediate-, and low-risk procedures. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project California State Inpatient Database between 2006 and 2011 was used to identify the patient cohort. Candidate variables for the adjusted model were determined a priori and included patient demographics with the ethnic group as the exposure of interest. RESULTS:The median age for Hispanics was 52 (SD 19.3) y, and 38.8% were male (n = 87,837). A higher proportion of Hispanics had Medicaid insurance (23.9% versus 3.8%) or were self-pay (14.2% versus 4.5%) compared with NHWs. In adjusted analysis, Hispanics had a higher odds risk for postoperative complications across all risk categories combined (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09). They also had an increased in-hospital (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.30) and 30-d mortality in high-risk procedures (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.51). CONCLUSIONS:Hispanics undergoing low- to high-risk surgery have worse outcomes compared with NHWs. These results do not support the hypothesis of an HP in surgical outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Eguia E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6251496 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Racial and Ethnic Postoperative Outcomes After Surgery: The Hispanic Paradox.

Eguia Emanuel E Cobb Adrienne N AN Kirshenbaum Eric J EJ Afshar Majid M Kuo Paul C PC

The Journal of surgical research 20180703

<h4>Background</h4>The Hispanic population in the United States have previously been shown to have, in some cases, better health outcomes than non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) despite having lower socioeconomic status and higher frequency of comorbidities. This epidemiologic finding is coined as the Hispanic Paradox (HP). Few studies have evaluated if the HP exists in surgical patients. Our study aimed to examine postoperative complications between Hispanic and NHW patients undergoing low- to high-ris ...[more]

PMID: 30463790

Similar Datasets

Project description:The incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is disproportionately high in nonwhite patients compared with white patients. However, variation in mortality according to race/ethnicity has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to examine all-cause mortality according to race/ethnicity among SLE patients enrolled in Medicaid.We used Medicaid Analytic eXtract data, with billing claims from 47 US states and Washington, DC, to identify individuals ages 18-65 years who were enrolled in Medicaid for ?3 months in 2000-2006. Individuals were classified as having SLE if they had ?3 visits ?30 days apart with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code for SLE (710.0). Among the individuals with SLE, those with lupus nephritis (LN) were identified by the presence of ?2 ICD-9 claims for glomerulonephritis, proteinuria, or renal failure. We calculated mortality rates per 1,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), according to race/ethnicity. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate mortality risks, adjusting for age, sex, demographics, and comorbidities.Among 42,221 prevalent cases of SLE, 8,191 prevalent cases of LN were identified. Blacks represented 40.1%, whites 38.4%, and Hispanics 15.3%. Overall SLE mortality rates per 1,000 person-years were highest among Native American (27.52), white (20.17), and black (24.13) patients and were lower among Hispanic (7.12) or Asian (5.18) patients. After multivariable adjustment, Hispanic and Asian patients had lower mortality risks (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48 [95% CI 0.40-0.59] and 0.59 [95% CI 0.40-0.86], respectively) compared with whites. Conversely, the risk of death was significantly higher among Native American (HR 1.40 [95% CI 1.04-1.90]) and black (HR 1.21 [95% CI 1.10-1.33]) patients compared with white patients. Among patients with LN, mortality risks were lower in Hispanic and Asian patients compared with white patients.After accounting for demographic and clinical factors, mortality among Asian and Hispanic Medicaid patients with SLE was lower than that among black, white, or Native American patients.

Project description:Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether racial and ethnic disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes exist at term.Study design We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational study of 115,502 pregnant patients and their neonates (2008-2011). Singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies delivered from 37 to 41 weeks were included. Race and ethnicity were abstracted from the medical record and categorized as non-Hispanic White (White; referent), non-Hispanic Black (Black), non-Hispanic Asian (Asian), or Hispanic. The primary outcome was an adverse perinatal composite defined as perinatal death, Apgar score < 4 at 5 minutes, ventilator support, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, subgaleal hemorrhage, skeletal fracture, infant stay greater than maternal stay (by ≥ 3 days), brachial plexus palsy, or facial nerve palsy.Results Of the 72,117 patients included, 48% were White, 20% Black, 5% Asian, and 26% Hispanic. The unadjusted risk of the primary outcome was highest for neonates of Black patients (3.1%, unadjusted relative risk [uRR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.30), lowest for neonates of Hispanic patients (2.1%, uRR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89), and no different for neonates of Asian (2.6%), compared with those of White patients (2.7%). In the adjusted model including age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, obstetric history, and high-risk pregnancy, differences in risk for the primary outcome were no longer observed for neonates of Black (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94-1.19) and Hispanic (aRR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81-1.04) patients. Adding insurance to the model lowered the risk for both groups (aRR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.96 for Black; aRR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59-0.78 for Hispanic).Conclusion Although neonates of Black patients have the highest frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes at term, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, this higher risk is no longer observed, suggesting the importance of developing strategies that address social determinants of health to lessen extant health disparities.Key points· Term neonates of Black patients have the highest crude frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes.. · After adjustment for confounders, higher risk for neonates of Black patients is no longer observed.. · Disparities in outcomes are strongly related to insurance status..

Dataset Information

Racial and Ethnic Postoperative Outcomes After Surgery: The Hispanic Paradox.

Publications

Racial and Ethnic Postoperative Outcomes After Surgery: The Hispanic Paradox.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets