Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a care manager (CM) programme compared with care as usual (CAU) for treatment of depression at primary care centres (PCCs) from a healthcare as well as societal perspective. DESIGN:Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING:23 PCCs in two Swedish regions. PARTICIPANTS:Patients with depression (n=342). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:A cost-effectiveness analysis was applied on a cluster randomised trial at PCC level where patients with depression had 3 months of contact with a CM (11 intervention PCCs, n=163) or CAU (12 control PCCs, n=179), with follow-up 3 and 6 months. Effectiveness measures were based on the number of depression-free days (DFDs) calculated from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: ?Cost/?QALY and ?Cost/?DFD. Sampling uncertainty was assessed based on non-parametric bootstrapping. RESULTS:Health benefits were higher in intervention group compared with CAU group: QALYs (0.357 vs 0.333, p<0.001) and DFD reduction of depressive symptom score (79.43 vs 60.14, p<0.001). The mean costs per patient for the 6-month period were €368 (healthcare perspective) and €6217 (societal perspective) for the intervention patients and €246 (healthcare perspective) and €7371 (societal perspective) for the control patients (n.s.). The cost per QALY gained was €6773 (healthcare perspective) and from a societal perspective the CM programme was dominant. DISCUSSION:The CM programme was associated with a gain in QALYs as well as in DFD, while also being cost saving compared with CAU from a societal perspective. This result is of high relevance for decision-makers on a national level, but it must be observed that a CM programme for depression implies increased costs at the primary care level. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT02378272; Results.

SUBMITTER: Holst A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6252772 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study.

Holst Anna A   Ginter Annika A   Björkelund Cecilia C   Hange Dominique D   Petersson Eva-Lisa EL   Svenningsson Irene I   Westman Jeanette J   André Malin M   Wikberg Carl C   Wallin Lars L   Möller Christina C   Svensson Mikael M  

BMJ open 20181112 11


<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a care manager (CM) programme compared with care as usual (CAU) for treatment of depression at primary care centres (PCCs) from a healthcare as well as societal perspective.<h4>Design</h4>Cost-effectiveness analysis.<h4>Setting</h4>23 PCCs in two Swedish regions.<h4>Participants</h4>Patients with depression (n=342).<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>A cost-effectiveness analysis was applied on a cluster randomised trial at PCC level where patien  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5578679 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5968353 | biostudies-literature